Let's talk about how good our candidate is, no matter who it is!

Leave the trash talk alone.

We can do better.

But Ok I'll bite

There have been a slew of threads bemoaning that one ethnicity or another is not embracing so & so's policy & aren't you concerned.

Ummm-do not agree with the premise & I'd wager the concerned person has other motives. As in to setup a strawman divide. Pick a topic-MFA, POT LGBTQ etc...

They all can be used as division points.


I almost always give it the under the bridge test. Who does the argument or discussion benefit. Can the argument then be used against us as stated above. Or are they just concerned.

Those last ones are what I call concern trolls. They are always concerned and question your lack of concern.

Very easy to be divisive in a free society. And free speech is always welcome. But please be aware the results can be skewed or used against us-even when not falsely generated.

And the push is on to raise those divisions so just be aware it is a tactic.

Harris was accused of using some word or phrase and I called bs on it. No way Harris said whatever “they” said she said.

Warren had some crap thrown at her that I commented bs.

Not one of our Democratic candidates should be disparage unnecessarily. It’s ugly.

What happens when someone lies about the Democratic party by claiming that it's "corrupt" or "feeble" or "ideologically bankrupt" or "the party of the one percent" or "the party of the elite"?



So many lies! So many torn-off wings! Feathers flying everywhere! Carnage!

People should post reasons to vote for their candidate
and not tear other Democrats down.

As candidate X or Y rise in the polls,
supporters of lesser candidates
increase their attacks on them.

"OH MY GAWD !
Candidate X wore black socks with a dark navy blue suit.
He must be destroyed!"

How do you promote Your candidate without pointing out the flaws of your Democratic opponent?

It would be great to constantly run an anti-tRump campaign, but that isn't realistic.

How would you like to proceed?

commentary about any other candidates. I was for Kamala Harris, but reckon it was a major mistake for her to single out Joe Biden for criticism in a televised debate. She would still be a sagacious choice for Veep nomination, notwithstanding this mistake, for any of the current front runners. United, we stand!

AG prosecuting the dump dictatorship?

Hell Yeah!!!

There are but millimeters of difference between us, when compared to the light years between us and Rethuglicans.

here on DU because I said something about a certain IL democrat congressman for his anti-abortion stance. I was informed that I was being sanctioned because we weren't supposed to bad-mouth democrats.

I will vote for the Democratic party nominee.

Full stop!

We don't need to do the republicans' work for them.

Nor do I bash. I post critical comments when criticism is warranted. I will continue to do so.

If everyone supports their candidate with facts and state why we support them we wouldn't need to point out the faults of others; we can read for ourselves. I don't need anyone telling me what's bad about other Democratic candidates. I'm perfectly capable of setting my own opinions without the needless backscatter.

...conflict in the Primary.

Letting the Trump/GOP call out the problems with Dem candidates first is way too premature, and unwise.

We would be feeding Russia Times and Pravda. Think about that, folks.

Meanwhile when some of us post positive threads about our candidates, other candidates supporters come in and take huge steaming shits in them... so yeah, round and round we go.

Sick of the miserable tear-down obsessives. Doing the devil’s work, for real.

... who is a better candidate and who is a worse one, then what's the point of DU????