Brexit in name only, fulfil the letter of the brexit referendum but not the spirit. After the referendum, they should have shifted to softening the blow as much as possible and not defying the vote.

On non brexit, focus on fixing healthcare (sound familiar?)

...since 1776. I don't expect it to become so anytime soon.

Today, we would never seriously consider a socialist for our highest office. We aren’t the “Brits.” It would be suicide to do so.

(I get it.. you're forced to argue against something no one has said because media/poor polling/name recognition. Tough old world, eh?)

was a smug, arrogant prick. He never stood a chance. The Brits just made thier bed- let em sleep in it.

did Labour run him when they knew how unpopular Corbyn was?

And the membership grew exponentially under Corbyn because he attracted new, young people into politics. Corbyn faced a leadership challenge in 2016 after his own MPs submitted a no confidence vote in him but he trounced his moderate challenger to keep his job.

The new young people tend to be in London or university towns which are already pro-Labour and most likely pro-EU. Corbyn and Labour lost seats in historically Labour towns when lifelong Labour voters switched to get brexit done.

synopsis, OL.

Good luck with Johnson, UK.

is not liked by the average person on the street. Just a plain Jerk.

you need a series of similar cases to make a point.

If the Brits hated Progressive Policies , he would have been crushed in 2017 ... He needed to take a stand on Brexit .. He decided not to decide ..He punted ..He lost

remainers split between Labour and Lib Dems. Corbyn was never clear about his position regarding Brexit, and many feel that he harbors Brexit sympathies. Moreover, he has faced accusations of anti-semitism — whether justified or not. To try to map the outcome of UK’s parliamentary election onto what’s going on in this country, or to compare Corbyn to Warren or Sanders, is apples and oranges in my opinion.

cost him the votes of Indians in UK who always voted labour and he lost nearly 35 seats over it.

He should have kept silent on India's stance in Kashmir.

🤪

Populism bring nothing but chaos and human misery.

Is probably more liberal than some Democrats in the U.S..

Corbyn's problem isn't his ideology. Its the fact that he a shitty person.

Neither was President Obama. Obviously.

Of the letter Comey sent 11 days before the election. Some Democrats stayed at home and some voted third party. The Russians kept Trump close enough with their propaganda and Comey's letter pushed Trump over the finish line.

"Some people say that if maybe that system was not rigged against me, I would have won the nomination and defeated Donald Trump."

As he loses yet another primary fight.

Link to tweet

And given the results of 2016, the Democrats could lose no matter what they do. Nothing is certain....but if the leftward shift doesn't show signs of moderating, the Democrats could be out in the cold for another 4 years.

saying all along.

The electoral majority of mainstream Americans who elected Obama twice averages out moderate liberal, and most of our best primary candidates are, no surprise, running as moderate liberals. Even conservative blue dog Seth Moulton tailored his recent voting record to show moderate liberal ahead of his run for president.

The widespread, toxic portrayal of a Democratic Party swinging far left is a lie intended to defeat us by suppressing mainstream left turnout.

Link to tweet