Democratic Primaries
Related: About this forumMedia Leave Yang Out of Candidate Conversations
It really is amazing that Yang has managed to keep building momentum despite this obvious problem.
Its part of a pattern for Yang. In the November debate, he also came in dead last on speaking minutes, at 6:48, despite polling higher than fellow debaters Klobuchar, Steyer, Tulsi Gabbard and Cory Booker. He also had the fewest minutes in the September and June debates. Business Insider (11/23/19) found that Yang has consistently received less speaking time at the debates than one would expect, given his polling numbers.
By FAIRs count, hes been given 37 prompts across the six debates; Klobucharwho has consistently polled below Yang for months, though her numbers have risen slightly to match his in recent weekshas gotten 54. Booker and Beto ORourke, who didnt even appear in all six debates and have polled at or below Yangs levels since September, received 43 and 36, respectively.
...
Cillizzas arguments seem to depict journalists as quite an intellectually challenged crew. In reality, its not that they cant work to get a sense of a new candidate, or to cover radical political ideas; its that the news organizations they work for give them no incentive tono conspiracy necessary, just an unhealthy bias toward the political establishment. Witness: A search of all CNN transcripts after Cillizzas September 4 mea culpa found not a single instance of Cillizza mentioning Yangs name on the air.
Echoing Cillizzas third point, New York magazines Ed Kilgore (9/3/19) suggested journalists may be ignoring Yang because he has no plausible path to the Democratic nomination, given that his support mainly lies among millennials and Asian-Americans, and that if he had a breakout debate performance his media coverage will skyrocket. How Yang might be expected to have a breakout debate when the moderators keep him on the sidelines isnt clear.
But the idea of a candidate having no plausible path to victory is a self-fulfilling prophecy: Journalists decide a candidate cant win, so they dont give the candidate coverage, which means the candidate cant reach voters, influence the political discussion and rise in the polls. The whole point of the primaries is to let voters get to know the candidates and decide for themselves who is electablethe last thing people need is journalists narrowing the field for them.
...
https://fair.org/home/media-leave-yang-out-of-candidate-conversations/
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
mopinko
(70,135 posts)he's really shining a light on so much that is f'd up, and doing a good job of applying common sense to the solutions.
i am really glad he is in this. i feel like he is gonna be like dean- doesnt get the nod, but builds a platform that will last.
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
redqueen
(115,103 posts)primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
marybourg
(12,633 posts)on NPRs Brian Lehrer show.
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
redqueen
(115,103 posts)primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
BeckyDem
(8,361 posts)primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
TidalWave46
(2,061 posts)And doesnt bring anything to the table for their ratings.
The media is a known quantity.
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
redqueen
(115,103 posts)That used to be considered one of the most respectable authorities when it comes to fairness in media.
Times sure have changed on DU.
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
TidalWave46
(2,061 posts)Are people somewhere on DU going after fair.org?
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
redqueen
(115,103 posts)You seem to be in disagreement with them that the treatment has been clearly unfair.
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
TidalWave46
(2,061 posts)You view my comment about their connection to their ratings as flattering to the media. Very interesting take you have.
I don't see how you came to your thought that my comment is "in disagreement with them that the treatment has been clearly unfair." I have read my post multiple times and can't figure out how you got there. Unless it's simply where you wanted to go no matter what I said.
How the media works is simply understandable. Not sure how people at this point don't get it. Then again, people can hear someone saying that the medias motivations when covering politics is ratings driven and come away thinking it's a hit on Fair.org. How in the world does one come to such a conclusion?
Yang has nothing to help their ratings, is below four percent in the polls, and people act like they don't get the media aspect of the relationship. That's what I find to be strange.
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
brooklynite
(94,602 posts)I've been in the audience for two debates with him. What I could see (and the TV viewers couldn't) is which candidates off-camera were trying to get the moderators' attention. Yang was rarely one of them.
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
redqueen
(115,103 posts)The statistics are here in black and white. I, and the people at FAIR, and many others - both Yang supporters and otherwise - recognize bias.
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided