Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
Related: About this forum
Congratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
America Doesn't Need a Grand Strategy
Searching for the next holy grail of foreign policy is stopping the United States from solving the worlds most pressing problems.****************
My posting of this very important article was prompted by an, IMO, excellent OP posted in the Democratic primaries about a hypothetical "Warren Doctrine." This is why I am posting this article in the Democratic Primaries Forum because foreign policy has assumed significant importance wrt recent events. For reference, here is the OP to which I refer: https://www.democraticunderground.com/1287415523
I hope that the Admins will take this context into consideration and NOT lock this thread in this forum because the article is important and contains good points that too many do NOT consider when they tout their particular candidate's "foreign policy expertise." I believe that too many here do not have the slightest idea what "foreign policy expertise" really means. Above all, it should NOT mean returning to the same-old-same-old failed stratagems and paradigms.
Here is the link to the article, which should be read in the context of what one's candidate has to offer in the foreign policy area..: https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/07/28/america-doesnt-need-a-grand-strategy-big-think-trump/ FP has one freebie article per month. This one is well worth it.
****************
Snippets:
...
Today, the United States doesnt need a grand strategy. Instead, U.S. leaders need to identify their priorities and craft strategies for each of them. The foreign-policy issues that matter to the lives of Americansfrom climate change to pandemic diseases to cyberattacksincreasingly require global responses. And leaders need to convince the American people that these challenges affect them directly and that tackling them requires robust U.S. engagement in the world.
The notion of U.S. grand strategy today revolves around Americas Cold War foreign policy of containmentthe brainchild of the diplomat George Kennanwhich sought to prevent the expansion of Moscows influence, bolstering the strength of the noncommunist world and squeezing the Soviet Union until it changed. The objective of containment drove U.S. policy until the Soviet Union collapsed. This victoryassumed to be the result of the containment policycreated a Cold War legacy that subsequent policymakers have looked on as a heyday for Washingtons global strategy.
....
In 1993, Anthony Lake, President Bill Clintons national security advisor, reportedly established what he called the Kennan sweepstakes to encourage his staff to develop a new grand strategy. Over the years, Washington has jumped from Clintons democratic enlargement to George W. Bushs global war on terrorism to Donald Trumps America First approach. Some strategies had more success than others, but none has captured the totality of the United States interests. Indeed, some grand strategies are little more than messaging exercises, providing a unifying justification for a broad range of disparate policies; others elevate one or two goals above all else.
...
Syria was the most devastating of the policy dilemmas. While Obama made clear his interest in getting the United States out of conflicts in the Middle East, the Syrian catastrophe could not be ignored. The United States publicly supported the aspirations of the Syrian people, financed humanitarian assistance, and attempted to end the war through diplomacy. As part of these goals, Obama included a red linethe public threat that a chemical weapons attack would change his calculus about interveningbut his decision not to respond militarily to a chemical attack in 2013 fed a perception that the United States lacked credibility.
...
The South China Sea is another example of the conundrum that policymakers face in applying principles to thorny real-world situations. When it comes to the maritime disputes between China and its neighbors, the United States prioritizes norms like the freedom of navigation and maintaining peace. But in upholding freedom of navigation in the South China Sea, the United States must consider its risk tolerance for a broader conflict with China: Should the United States be willing to use force to deter China from threatening its neighbors?Should the United States be willing to use force to deter China from threatening its neighbors? If the United States is not willing to use force while China is, can the United States effectively uphold norms in the region?
...
During two periods since World War II, the United States has adopted grand strategies that garnered widespread domestic support and that served as lodestars for U.S. policycontainment and the global war on terrorism. But both of those grand strategies were often counterproductive. ...
Today, the United States doesnt need a grand strategy. Instead, U.S. leaders need to identify their priorities and craft strategies for each of them. The foreign-policy issues that matter to the lives of Americansfrom climate change to pandemic diseases to cyberattacksincreasingly require global responses. And leaders need to convince the American people that these challenges affect them directly and that tackling them requires robust U.S. engagement in the world.
The notion of U.S. grand strategy today revolves around Americas Cold War foreign policy of containmentthe brainchild of the diplomat George Kennanwhich sought to prevent the expansion of Moscows influence, bolstering the strength of the noncommunist world and squeezing the Soviet Union until it changed. The objective of containment drove U.S. policy until the Soviet Union collapsed. This victoryassumed to be the result of the containment policycreated a Cold War legacy that subsequent policymakers have looked on as a heyday for Washingtons global strategy.
....
In 1993, Anthony Lake, President Bill Clintons national security advisor, reportedly established what he called the Kennan sweepstakes to encourage his staff to develop a new grand strategy. Over the years, Washington has jumped from Clintons democratic enlargement to George W. Bushs global war on terrorism to Donald Trumps America First approach. Some strategies had more success than others, but none has captured the totality of the United States interests. Indeed, some grand strategies are little more than messaging exercises, providing a unifying justification for a broad range of disparate policies; others elevate one or two goals above all else.
...
Syria was the most devastating of the policy dilemmas. While Obama made clear his interest in getting the United States out of conflicts in the Middle East, the Syrian catastrophe could not be ignored. The United States publicly supported the aspirations of the Syrian people, financed humanitarian assistance, and attempted to end the war through diplomacy. As part of these goals, Obama included a red linethe public threat that a chemical weapons attack would change his calculus about interveningbut his decision not to respond militarily to a chemical attack in 2013 fed a perception that the United States lacked credibility.
...
The South China Sea is another example of the conundrum that policymakers face in applying principles to thorny real-world situations. When it comes to the maritime disputes between China and its neighbors, the United States prioritizes norms like the freedom of navigation and maintaining peace. But in upholding freedom of navigation in the South China Sea, the United States must consider its risk tolerance for a broader conflict with China: Should the United States be willing to use force to deter China from threatening its neighbors?Should the United States be willing to use force to deter China from threatening its neighbors? If the United States is not willing to use force while China is, can the United States effectively uphold norms in the region?
...
During two periods since World War II, the United States has adopted grand strategies that garnered widespread domestic support and that served as lodestars for U.S. policycontainment and the global war on terrorism. But both of those grand strategies were often counterproductive. ...
***********
There is SO much MORE to read and ponder in the article. Foreign policy, going forward, is something that MUST be rethought. The article was written by an Obama Admin official, Michael Fuchs, who served in the Department of State under both Secretary Clinton and Secretary Kerry. https://www.americanprogress.org/about/staff/fuchs-michael/bio/
***********
Of course, the FIRST thing for ANY President to do in foreign policy is to reassure our allies in western democracies that that they are indeed our allies and that the US considers the circle of autocrats that 45 currently kowtows to as an aberration. The SECOND is to thoroughly cleanse the DOS and the NSC of ANY unsavory holdouts from 45's Admin (perhaps even some from 43's) and to rebuild the noble and committed foreign service that was once a source of national pride.
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
0 replies, 391 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post