Ffs.

Still think the "who's best" Democratic choice is inoperative and they should have simply endorsed ANY DEMOCRAT who wins the primaries. Leave it to the voter to figure it out. They all have redeeming and positive attributes when compared to the criminal-moron stumbling around in the WH this minute.

Endorsing three would have been completely meaningless.

This is the dumbest thing I've ever seen.

is not a good thing.

Yeah, whatever ...

again. This 'aberration' is what the pukes have been cultivating and working towards for years.

Link to tweet

Brutal.

Sorry, they endorsed her, and she had the most votes. At least Joe trounced Bernie:

Link to tweet

Don't be mislead by the nice things they say about Warren and Klobuchar, who together represent some of the best our party has to offer the nation.

But the editorial board has endorsed a two-headed candidate who doesn't exist, while raising questions about both and thus suggesting they're both inadequate on their own.

And their evaluation of our frontrunner and his goals has so carefully avoided the qualities and realities of what he offers as to be a profoundly dishonest, continuation of the sabotage the NYT is now famous for. Biden's powerful campaign theme is the need to unite to stop the rise of RW fascism and its threatened takeover, a theme that's united most of the nation behind him, but that's not mentioned even to dismiss.

Of course.

The NYT has been proven to have worked systematically to defeat Democrats in 2016. Not only systematically by negative coverage every day, and by hiding or avoiding covering negatives about our opponents, but even by publishing blatant lies, including directly before the election when they reported the FBI investigation into Trump-Russia had found nothing.

The NYT's executive editor who's been working to build RW power ever since he was hired in 2014, Dean Bouquet, is still in charge. That a man known to have betrayed every principle of journalism and severely damaged the NYT's reputation for integrity has not been fired says everything in itself. He works for them.

Speaking of these people they're trying to take out, as I've been reminding in other posts, however the situation may have advanced, we know that in 2015 VP Biden wanted very dynamic, iconoclastic, "I have an idea for that" Elizabeth Warren for his VP workmate, reportedly ONLY Warren.

And that says something extremely important about Biden that the Board's evaluation blatantly denies exists. You don't partner with a Warren (or a turbocharged VP Klobuchar) to "restore the status quo." That summation alone is an obvious, flaming hit in this election that would be hard to top.