haven't run across that.

those who craft subject lines with the purpose of spreading their hatred of Warren.

Pitiful.

words only, blm.

Giving you lotsa space to do your primary loyalty thing, because I think you know in your heart that there is truth in my observations.

Ciao.

so you try to "kill the messenger".

Just calling out the subject line as written and its purpose.

Would you appreciate anyone posting every cherrypicked negative word against your candidate to post in their subject line? Would you see it for what it is....a tactic. Pretty sure you would attack back at that post.

spinning any Democrat who possesses that toughness as divisive.

It’s a weak, cop out nod to the inevitable whiners.

posts have when you snipe at anyone who dares disagree with Warren.

https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1287&pid=407602

https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1287&pid=341711

https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1287&pid=341606


This is primary season, blm, and NOT a holy war.

When you accuse supporters of other candidates of "evil" and "hatred" simply for disagreeing with Warren you're really taking this too far.

And in this case I'm being accused of "Warren hate" for quoting part of the Des Moines Register's endorsement.

Please try to get some perspective here.

is certainly not helping the candidate of those who continue to perpetrate it either.

I noticed this bias a few months back. Not from YOU, Cha, to be clear.

But it has become MUCH more obvious since, I am VERY sorry to say.

And that is all that I'm saying here in this thread to anyone. Period.

Whatever one wants to call it, the single mindedness of the targeting is usually driven by something.

single-minded determination to smear people simply because you disagree with what they say in this forum.

I'm tired of it.

There are many, many threads here critical of all the candidates, including the one I support.

They aren't "evil."

They don't indicate "hatred."

And the only thing they're "driven by" is an interest in politics.

Again, try to get some perspective.

No mystery.

You think you’re being tactical when you craft your subject lines to be antiWarren.

Good thing I would never whine that “you’re not helping your candidate with these divisive posts of yours.”

you know better than that.

If the OP is surprised by the pushback maybe scan the board and see if any other non-Warren supporters felt the need to start a thread like this.

Comes from someplace dark, IMO.

hadn't answered my question about where the DMR's editors had said what you claimed they said.

And I posted this OP because no one would ever have known from the other OPs about the endorsement that it wasn't an unqualified endorsement, and the DMR endorsement started with these paragraphs:

EW and then they had more to say.. you could debate that or ignore it.

I'd happily vote for either of them. And when you get right down to it they are more alike than they are different. There's no need for all of these accusations of "hate." Nobody is hating, or if they are, they are stupid and destructive. Don't hate Democrats.