Democratic Primaries
Related: About this forumAfter epic 'nightmare' in Iowa, dem app built by secretive firm Shadow Inc. comes under scrutiny.
.
Published on RawStory by Common Dreams author Jake Jacobs.
State campaign finance records indicate the Iowa Democratic Party paid Shadow more than $60,000 for website development over two installments in November and December of last year, HuffPost reported late Monday. A Democratic source with knowledge of the process said those payments were for the app that caucus site leaders were supposed to use to upload the results at their locales.
Shadow has also been paid for services by the Nevada Democratic Party and the presidential campaigns of former Vice President Joe Biden and former South Bend, Indiana Mayor Pete Buttigieg, according to Federal Election Commission filings.
Kevin Gosztola
@kgosztola
I'm not the only one sharing this screen shot, but it seems important for this to get around to as many people as possible.
This is the "About" page for Shadow Inc, which was contracted to make the app for #IowaCaucuses. No staff named. This outfit is inexcusably secretive.Link to tweet
.
.
The New York Times, citing anonymous people who were briefed on the app by Iowa Democratic Party officials, reported that the app was hastily constructed in just two months and not properly tested at a statewide scale.
The party decided to use the app only after another proposal for reporting voteswhich entailed having caucus participants call in their votes over the phonewas abandoned, on the advice of Democratic National Committee officials, the Times reported.
The secrecy around the app this year came from the Iowa Democratic Party, which asked that even its name be withheld from the public, according to the Times. There were concerns that the app would malfunction in areas with poor connectivity, or because of high bandwidth use, such as when many people tried to use it at the same time.
.
.
Man, this article casts a really fucked-up portrayal of that app.
That app should also be torn down and inspected by cyber-security people to determine vulnerabilities.
.
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
jalan48
(13,881 posts)primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
Autumn
(45,120 posts)Thanks for posting this.
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
highplainsdem
(49,029 posts)primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
Hav
(5,969 posts)Because they don't publish the names of their employees on the about page? I hope and wish most companies handle it like that.
There is no point publishing the names of individual employees, maybe except for those who are contact persons that are supposed to filter incoming queries or CEOs. My company used to publish names and photos. I'm glad they don't do that nonsense anymore. People are interested in the service, not the individual and employees should have privacy rights as well.
As for security, I don't know whether it's true but there was a thread that said it was tested by external official sources (Homeland Security).
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
highplainsdem
(49,029 posts)being "inexcusably secretive."
As I said in another reply here, this article is conspiracy-mongering.
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden