Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Joe BidenCongratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
 

TheBlackAdder

(28,211 posts)
Tue Feb 4, 2020, 01:34 PM Feb 2020

After epic 'nightmare' in Iowa, dem app built by secretive firm Shadow Inc. comes under scrutiny.

.

Published on RawStory by Common Dreams author Jake Jacobs.


The app, according to several news reports, was developed by the secretive for-profit tech firm Shadow Inc., which has ties to and receives funding from ACRONYM, a Democratic digital non-profit organization. Shadow’s CEO is Gerard Niemira, who worked on Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign.

“State campaign finance records indicate the Iowa Democratic Party paid Shadow… more than $60,000 for ‘website development’ over two installments in November and December of last year,” HuffPost reported late Monday. “A Democratic source with knowledge of the process said those payments were for the app that caucus site leaders were supposed to use to upload the results at their locales.”

Shadow has also been paid for services by the Nevada Democratic Party and the presidential campaigns of former Vice President Joe Biden and former South Bend, Indiana Mayor Pete Buttigieg, according to Federal Election Commission filings.

Kevin Gosztola
@kgosztola
I'm not the only one sharing this screen shot, but it seems important for this to get around to as many people as possible.

This is the "About" page for Shadow Inc, which was contracted to make the app for #IowaCaucuses. No staff named. This outfit is inexcusably secretive.



.
.
The New York Times, citing anonymous people who were briefed on the app by Iowa Democratic Party officials, reported that the app was hastily constructed in just two months and “not properly tested at a statewide scale.”

“The party decided to use the app only after another proposal for reporting votes—which entailed having caucus participants call in their votes over the phone—was abandoned, on the advice of Democratic National Committee officials,” the Times reported.

“The secrecy around the app this year came from the Iowa Democratic Party, which asked that even its name be withheld from the public,” according to the Times. “There were concerns that the app would malfunction in areas with poor connectivity, or because of high bandwidth use, such as when many people tried to use it at the same time.”
.
.



Man, this article casts a really fucked-up portrayal of that app.

That app should also be torn down and inspected by cyber-security people to determine vulnerabilities.

.
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
After epic 'nightmare' in Iowa, dem app built by secretive firm Shadow Inc. comes under scrutiny. (Original Post) TheBlackAdder Feb 2020 OP
And here I thought it was the Russian's fault again, unless Shadow is secretly being run by them. jalan48 Feb 2020 #1
Wow. That app NEEDS to be torn down and inspected. For everything. Autumn Feb 2020 #2
Conspiracy-mongering. And that's Jake Johnson, not Jake Jacobs. Common Dreams link: highplainsdem Feb 2020 #3
Inexcusably secretive? Hav Feb 2020 #4
I noticed that, too. Their not publishing staff names is a ridiculous reason to accuse them of highplainsdem Feb 2020 #5
 

jalan48

(13,881 posts)
1. And here I thought it was the Russian's fault again, unless Shadow is secretly being run by them.
Tue Feb 4, 2020, 01:38 PM
Feb 2020
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

Autumn

(45,120 posts)
2. Wow. That app NEEDS to be torn down and inspected. For everything.
Tue Feb 4, 2020, 01:39 PM
Feb 2020

Thanks for posting this.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

Hav

(5,969 posts)
4. Inexcusably secretive?
Tue Feb 4, 2020, 01:49 PM
Feb 2020

Because they don't publish the names of their employees on the about page? I hope and wish most companies handle it like that.
There is no point publishing the names of individual employees, maybe except for those who are contact persons that are supposed to filter incoming queries or CEOs. My company used to publish names and photos. I'm glad they don't do that nonsense anymore. People are interested in the service, not the individual and employees should have privacy rights as well.

As for security, I don't know whether it's true but there was a thread that said it was tested by external official sources (Homeland Security).

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

highplainsdem

(49,029 posts)
5. I noticed that, too. Their not publishing staff names is a ridiculous reason to accuse them of
Tue Feb 4, 2020, 01:52 PM
Feb 2020

being "inexcusably secretive."

As I said in another reply here, this article is conspiracy-mongering.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»After epic 'nightmare' in...