Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Joe BidenCongratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
 

left-of-center2012

(34,195 posts)
Sun Feb 9, 2020, 04:46 PM Feb 2020

Warren dismisses need to win New Hampshire: 'It's going to be a long campaign'

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) dismissed the need to place in the top two in Tuesday’s New Hampshire primaries after trailing in third coming out of last week’s Iowa caucuses.

“The way I see this is it's going to be a long campaign,” Warren said Sunday on ABC’s “This Week.”

Host George Stephanopoulos noted that no candidate has ever won the nomination without placing in the top two in Iowa or New Hampshire. Warren pointed to her decision to campaign not only in the early states but across the country as she builds a “campaign to go the distance.”

“When I made the decision not to spend 70 percent of my time raising money from billionaires and corporate executive and lobbyists, it meant I had a lot more time to go around the country,” she said. “I've been to 31 states to do town halls, red states and blue states. We have about 1,000 people on the ground. We built a campaign to go the distance and that's what I think is going to happen.”

Warren is in third place, at 13 percent, in New Hampshire, according to a new WBZ-Boston Globe-Suffolk University poll released Sunday. She trails Sanders and Buttigieg who are in a statistical tie for first at 24 percent and 22 percent, respectively, based on the poll.

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/482220-warren-dismisses-need-to-win-new-hampshire-its-going-to-be-a-long-campaign

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Warren dismisses need to win New Hampshire: 'It's going to be a long campaign' (Original Post) left-of-center2012 Feb 2020 OP
She's right.. Just Iowa and NH are Cha Feb 2020 #1
It'll come down to funding and volunteer enthusiasm for her Kentonio Feb 2020 #2
Good Retrograde Feb 2020 #3
If you check the GOP side, none of the GOP presidents elected since primaries began won Iowa and NH. Scurrilous Feb 2020 #4
Except that isn't the narrative. That's a straw man narrative you seem to have invented. Garrett78 Feb 2020 #5
 

Cha

(297,767 posts)
1. She's right.. Just Iowa and NH are
Sun Feb 9, 2020, 04:57 PM
Feb 2020

not all that this country represents.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

Kentonio

(4,377 posts)
2. It'll come down to funding and volunteer enthusiasm for her
Sun Feb 9, 2020, 05:21 PM
Feb 2020

Like it always does as these things progress.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

Retrograde

(10,163 posts)
3. Good
Sun Feb 9, 2020, 05:31 PM
Feb 2020

It's time to break the MSM narrative that the candidates people in Iowa and New Hampshire like are the same ones that people in the rest of the country want. I'm sure they're nice people in these states, and they're entitled to their opinions, but the other 90+% of the population might not necessarily agree.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

Scurrilous

(38,687 posts)
4. If you check the GOP side, none of the GOP presidents elected since primaries began won Iowa and NH.
Mon Feb 10, 2020, 12:43 AM
Feb 2020

It's a bullshit narrative.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

Garrett78

(10,721 posts)
5. Except that isn't the narrative. That's a straw man narrative you seem to have invented.
Mon Feb 10, 2020, 01:52 AM
Feb 2020

It's not about winning *both* IA and NH.

The fact is that no candidate from either party, in the last 40 years, has won the nomination without winning *either* IA or NH, except for Clinton in '92. Every other nominee over the last 40 years - from either party - has won *either* IA or NH. And, as I keep explaining, '92 isn't really much of an exception. Because IA was essentially nullified that year, and because Clinton's strong showing in NH (2nd behind Tsongas of MA) and the resulting "comeback kid" narrative is precisely what propelled Clinton forward. Clinton was finishing top 3 in nearly every contest leading up to Super Tuesday.

Pointing to '92 as evidence that Biden isn't in trouble is backfiring on you and others. You're inadvertently making the exact opposite case that you want to be making.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»Warren dismisses need to ...