Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Joe BidenCongratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
 

reggieandlee

(778 posts)
Mon Feb 10, 2020, 08:12 PM Feb 2020

BTRTN New Hampshire Preview and Projection: Bernie Will Win a Home Game, Pete Makes it Close

Born To Run The Numbers with its projection for the New Hampshire primary and the implications:

http://www.borntorunthenumbers.com/2020/02/btrtn-new-hampshire-preview-and.html

"Bernie Sanders is expected to win (he has led outright in 28 out of 29 polls here since mid-January and was tied with Biden in the other). Anything less, particularly in New Hampshire, a neighboring state to his Vermont home, would be viewed as a shocking outcome. He needs to hold off Pete Buttigieg, who is charging fast off his Iowa “half win.”

"Our BTRTN prediction is that Bernie Sanders will win New Hampshire by a material margin (~+5 points) over Pete Buttigieg, with Biden, Warren, and Klobuchar bunch up well behind Buttigieg. It’s very hard to determine the order of 3-4-5, but the polls are showing Warren, Biden, and then Klobuchar so we will stick to that...

"This outcome would be very good for Bernie, perfectly acceptable for Pete, barely passable for Warren and a problem for Biden – two fourth place finishes. Biden and Klobuchar both would be showing weaker results than Iowa, by a few percentage points -- but Klobuchar might still hang in on the theory that Biden is more clearly in decline, given his long frontrunner status, whereas she is arguably on the rise from a month ago. With no absolutely clear leader after the first two contests, Bloomberg and Steyer remain in the hunt. The rest should be gone."

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
BTRTN New Hampshire Preview and Projection: Bernie Will Win a Home Game, Pete Makes it Close (Original Post) reggieandlee Feb 2020 OP
This is the same site that predicted Sanders with "a solid win" in Iowa, right? W_HAMILTON Feb 2020 #1
Yep Tiggeroshii Feb 2020 #4
Caucuses are hard! tgards79 Feb 2020 #6
You can do it! Tiggeroshii Feb 2020 #8
His prediction for Iowa was "Bernie with a solid win, Biden comfortably in second" Happyhippychick Feb 2020 #2
Some of the late polls did. TwilightZone Feb 2020 #3
It does not even account for the first ballot. tgards79 Feb 2020 #7
Good points. TwilightZone Feb 2020 #10
Yes it was wrong tgards79 Feb 2020 #5
Because they can't keep two thoughts in their heads. judeling Feb 2020 #9
There is no affinity between NH and VT politics. aikoaiko Feb 2020 #11
 

W_HAMILTON

(7,869 posts)
1. This is the same site that predicted Sanders with "a solid win" in Iowa, right?
Mon Feb 10, 2020, 08:15 PM
Feb 2020
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

Tiggeroshii

(11,088 posts)
4. Yep
Mon Feb 10, 2020, 08:39 PM
Feb 2020

They have some work to do to make up for that. Predicted Biden in a solid 2nd place.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

tgards79

(1,415 posts)
6. Caucuses are hard!
Mon Feb 10, 2020, 08:58 PM
Feb 2020


Yes, we have some work to do!
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

Tiggeroshii

(11,088 posts)
8. You can do it!
Mon Feb 10, 2020, 09:00 PM
Feb 2020

The 2016 election proves it.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

Happyhippychick

(8,379 posts)
2. His prediction for Iowa was "Bernie with a solid win, Biden comfortably in second"
Mon Feb 10, 2020, 08:18 PM
Feb 2020

So dead wrong.

Why did nobody see buttigieg coming? I'm baffled by the whole thing.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

TwilightZone

(25,472 posts)
3. Some of the late polls did.
Mon Feb 10, 2020, 08:24 PM
Feb 2020

David Binder, who's a bit of a non-traditional pollster, had Buttigieg ahead in his final poll on 1/31.

The problem with polling a caucus, of course, is that it only accounts for the first ballot. Most, if not all, of the pollsters don't even consider movement of supporters of non-viable candidates and the like. Some covered stuff like first-choice/second-choice, but I can't recall any of them predicting post-move totals.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

tgards79

(1,415 posts)
7. It does not even account for the first ballot.
Mon Feb 10, 2020, 08:59 PM
Feb 2020

You have to invest much more time in a caucus, and so it is harder to determine who is a "likely caucus voter."

And then the threshold and second round problem. We predicted final totals, assuming Pete, at the 15% level, could get shut out in up to 50% of the precincts. Wrong!

Very hard!

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

TwilightZone

(25,472 posts)
10. Good points.
Mon Feb 10, 2020, 09:25 PM
Feb 2020

Of course, turnout was also somewhat lower than expected, which further complicated predictions.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

tgards79

(1,415 posts)
5. Yes it was wrong
Mon Feb 10, 2020, 08:55 PM
Feb 2020

To be fair, the polls were clear: Sanders #1, Biden #2, and Biden had been a steady 20% in Iowa for a while. Pete was at 16%, which seemed to mean that he could be shut out in as many as 50% of the precincts, given the 15% threshold.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

judeling

(1,086 posts)
9. Because they can't keep two thoughts in their heads.
Mon Feb 10, 2020, 09:19 PM
Feb 2020

CW had the Impeachment Trial hurting the Senators and helping Buttigieg and Biden. That was half right because they didn't account for the battering that Biden would take in the process. It was all BS and people knew it, but it was to much like the Damn EMails. So the Biden collapse was masked by the natural rally effect of firm support of a candidate under attack that was actually eroding.

The other thing that the polls missed because there weren't enough of them. Was how much the undecided vote increased.

I wish the data was easier to get, but what I have looked at so far indicates that For Klobuchar and Warren in particular showed their strongest support in the places where their campaigns managed to get to in the days during the trial. I don't have a full dataset but that appears to be a solid trend. Some of that will be of course campaigns focusing on where they were strong, but that is part of the problem they had to rush in and play defense. But it looks like they just didn't get the chance to make the final pitch and rally their troops.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

aikoaiko

(34,173 posts)
11. There is no affinity between NH and VT politics.
Mon Feb 10, 2020, 09:35 PM
Feb 2020

Bordering state doesn't matter at all to NH residents. I lived there.

Just look at Elizabeth Warren's current status given her borderstate state. In fact, given all the MA transplants to southern NH, it is stunning that Elizabeth Warren is not doing better.

My point is that Bernie is earning it. And he has to protect it from other challengers like Mayor Pete.


If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»BTRTN New Hampshire Previ...