Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Joe BidenCongratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
 

RandySF

(59,122 posts)
Sat Apr 6, 2019, 04:01 PM Apr 2019

'Virtual Caucuses' Could Skew Iowa's 2020 Electorate Even Older

Once it’s in place, Democratic voters will be able to cast ballots the week before the in-person meetings, with participants allowed to submit a list of as many as five candidates ranked by preference. In the past, they had to show up at school gymnasiums, fire stations, community centers and other gathering places to show their support for a presidential candidate. In 2020, there will be roughly 1,700 such precinct locations.

The Iowa chapter of AARP, the largest advocacy group in the U.S. for people 50 and older, is already preparing to train its members to participate in the virtual caucuses if they’re unable to attend in person. Four of the six scheduled voting sessions are during the day, with the remaining two at 7 p.m.

“I believe the real winners are seniors,” Anderson said. “Those are times that work really well for people who are older and retired.”

Anderson said he expects there will be 60,000 to 75,000 AARP members participating in the 2020 caucuses. The organization has about 370,000 members in Iowa and is one of the largest statewide organizations.

Those 50 and older already typically account for the majority of participants in Iowa, the first state to winnow the field. That age group accounted for 58 percent of Democratic caucus-goers in 2016, according to entrance polls, while 28 percent were 65 and older.

Sanders only received 26 percent of the 65 and older Iowa vote in 2016, while Hillary Clinton was backed by 69 percent of those in that age group. Sanders did much better among younger voters, securing 84 percent from those 17 to 29 (people who are 17 can participate if they turn 18 by Election Day the following November). But they only represented 18 percent of the electorate.

Overall, Sanders nearly tied Clinton in the 2016 caucuses, and he is looking to improve on that performance to break away from other 2020 Democrats. Sanders, like other candidates next year, will have to adjust his strategy to target voters participating in person as well as those taking advantage of the virtual caucus system.

Dave Nagle, a former congressman who also served as chairman of the Iowa Democratic Party, said he expects both older and younger voters to most heavily take advantage of the new option. “You might see it on the ends of the spectrum,” he said.



https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-04-03/-virtual-caucuses-could-skew-iowa-s-2020-electorate-even-older

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
'Virtual Caucuses' Could Skew Iowa's 2020 Electorate Even Older (Original Post) RandySF Apr 2019 OP
Good Exotiki Apr 2019 #1
That's good for the reasons stated, and also because caucus goers tend to be bullied and badgered... George II Apr 2019 #2
Yeah, bullies don't Cha Apr 2019 #4
Wow, bullying? How so? RandySF Apr 2019 #7
I don't know, nor do I care, who this helps or hurts dsc Apr 2019 #3
I agree dsc. Uncle Joe Apr 2019 #5
Agree Agschmid Apr 2019 #10
The whole country should vote at the same time, period Wabbajack_ Apr 2019 #6
How does this work? Are the votes actually counted? Demsrule86 Apr 2019 #8
This will prevent bullying by supporters of one candidate BlueFlorida Apr 2019 #9
 

Exotiki

(37 posts)
1. Good
Sat Apr 6, 2019, 09:44 PM
Apr 2019

Because it used to be more difficult for them in the past.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

George II

(67,782 posts)
2. That's good for the reasons stated, and also because caucus goers tend to be bullied and badgered...
Sat Apr 6, 2019, 09:54 PM
Apr 2019

That's why several states are going back to primaries next year rather than conducting caucuses.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

Cha

(297,503 posts)
4. Yeah, bullies don't
Sat Apr 6, 2019, 10:46 PM
Apr 2019

get to take over.

That's no way to be subjected to when you want to cast your vote.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

RandySF

(59,122 posts)
7. Wow, bullying? How so?
Sun Apr 7, 2019, 01:14 AM
Apr 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

dsc

(52,166 posts)
3. I don't know, nor do I care, who this helps or hurts
Sat Apr 6, 2019, 09:55 PM
Apr 2019

it is the right thing to do, plain and simple.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

Wabbajack_

(1,300 posts)
6. The whole country should vote at the same time, period
Sun Apr 7, 2019, 01:13 AM
Apr 2019

It's not fair that a few small states have such a outsized influence.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

Demsrule86

(68,632 posts)
8. How does this work? Are the votes actually counted?
Sun Apr 7, 2019, 08:56 AM
Apr 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

BlueFlorida

(1,532 posts)
9. This will prevent bullying by supporters of one candidate
Sun Apr 7, 2019, 09:12 AM
Apr 2019

which was commonplace during the last cycle.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»'Virtual Caucuses' Could ...