Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
Related: About this forum
Congratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
Pundits say Democrats who want to ban fracking can't win Pa. Here's why they're wrong.
Philadelphia Inquirer
February 17, 2020 - 7:00 AM (about one week old)
Though it might not feel like it, the Democratic presidential race has only just begun. Nonetheless, many pundits and prognosticators are already focused on Pennsylvania, confidently predicting that Democrats who support a ban on fracking will lose the state, and hence the election, to Donald Trump. Its a common refrain, but there is zero evidence to support it -- and plenty of evidence that Pennsylvania voters have backed anti-fracking candidates.
This talking point says that by supporting a ban on fracking, Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren play right into Trumps hands. The same pitch is even coming from Democrats like Lt. Governor John Fetterman. But this falls apart when you look at what actual voters say.
A recent Franklin & Marshall poll found that more Pennsylvania voters actually support a fracking ban than oppose the idea (48 to 39 percent). And in previous years, that same poll has shown that voters have dramatically shifted, with a solid majority saying the environmental costs of drilling outweigh the supposed economic benefits.
Of course, fossil fuel companies tout jobs when they talk about frackings importance to Pennsylvania. What they dont tell you is that a relatively small number of Pennsylvanians work in the shale industry-- and that number is shrinking, thanks to the industrys inability to turn a profit from gas drilling. Hundreds of drilling jobs were lost last year in the Pittsburgh area, and 2020 is not looking to be any more favorable, with very few new wells being drilled.
Polls are just one part of the story. The real question is whether this has been tested at the ballot box. It turns out that Pennsylvania voters are responding to anti-fracking candidates by electing them. Progressive Democrats like Summer Lee and Sara Innamorato won seats in 2018 by speaking out against frackings toll on the health and safety of the communities they represent. The grassroots campaign against the Mariner East pipelines in Delaware and Chester Counties mobilized support for candidates like Danielle Friel Otten, who stood up to the industry. And last year, intense opposition to local fracking projects in the Pittsburgh suburbs flipped town councils, putting anti-fracking majorities in charge. In one case, anti-fracking candidates in Franklin Park won by turning precincts where Trump won handily and turning them blue.
A little more at link: https://www.inquirer.com/opinion/commentary/fracking-pennsylvania-ban-democratic-candidates-20200217.html
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 344 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Pundits say Democrats who want to ban fracking can't win Pa. Here's why they're wrong. (Original Post)
Mike 03
Feb 2020
OP
Progressive2020
(713 posts)1. Pundits
Most Pundits on Cable News have biases and base their views on ideology and anecdotal evidence versus science and legitimate polls. I do not trust what most Pundits say, and take it all with a big grain of salt. In this particular case, there seems to be evidence that anti-fracking is favored, not opposed, by a majority in places like Pennsylvania. So, these Pundits may well be wrong.
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided