I have to give one credit. The Onion article referring to "all nine of Gabbard's supporters" was posted on DU and answered with "it's 10, dammit!"

I thought that was pretty funny. Credit where it's due, even if I have to question their choice of candidate.

A couple isn't 1%, of course. In general, I think you're right.

Tip
Your
Waitstaff

TlalocW

Perhaps they have, can never be too sure with THEM.

So far you're it on this thread. Admire the dedication though.

TlalocW

I suspect a revisitation limited to active members would get her a 0.

1 is greater than 0.

I’m fairly active on DU. Especially when on the clock and procrastinating with work tasks!

Wishing Sen. Warren a strong Super Tuesday!

I need to leave for work in 10 minutes, and procrastinating is my biggest hobby.

Best to you,

Due to my overriding preference for veterans.

She's fortunate to have your support.

be in the race?

https://www.democraticunderground.com/1287615843

Donations? Greater name recognition for when she changes parties?

and reason number three: to bolster her resume for that FOX reader job. They need at least one brunette to go along with all the blondes.

she could be all the rage.

So to speak.

If you can't get your blood pressure up at least 25% when thinking about HILLARY'S EMAILS you can't cut it on FOX.

She's in it for exposure and a paid media gig. She doesn't need much support to show up on Fox - I'm sure they pay her whatever it takes to get her on.

I'm not supposed to say anything bad about any Democrats.
I'm not supposed to say anything bad about any Democrats.
I'm not supposed to say anything bad about any Democrats.
I'm not supposed to say anything bad about any Democrats.

I could Bart Simpson that on a chalkboard all day long and still need to find a sock and some duct tape to keep from saying anything. Moving right along so I don't get zapped either.

I think it's pretty safe in this instance.

and what she STILL is all about, watch her silly song on YouTube and read an article where she basically says she is still against gay people. The song is for her mentor who was a raging homophobe. The song was sung just a couple years ago, not "ages" ago like her supporters would insist.

PLUS, there is an article where she was asked point blank if she still felt the same way about conversion therapy and all of the other anti-gay stuff she stood for in the past and she skirted around the issue by saying she votes for gay rights because she doesn't think she should force her beliefs on others. So, in essence, she was saying that, yes, in fact, she is still a raging homophobe.

I would need an industrial strength clothes pin to vote for her, if, Heaven forbid, middle America or the party decided to nominate her, but I can't stand Trump. He's gotta go.

I'd write in Tom Harkin first.

and that it is mostly from people who chose her a long time ago and have not bothered to update.

or (more likely) at least attempting to appear as such.




Simply a guess of mine. Not an allegation, implication or label.

Happy Super Tuesday to you all. GET OUT AND VOTE!!!

It's a weird, weird subset of 60-something white guys. I don't get it either.

PPRd or FFRd. I think they are still in the calculation, but I don't know.

I understand that most of the primaries for the people likely to vote for someone like Tulsi Gabbard have been cancelled this year.

...but was still able to provide a candidate of choice. And of course it was Tulsi.

not a troll.

Seriously, what the hell happened to her?

St. Petersburg.