Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Sophia4

(3,515 posts)
41. Single payer does not cost as much as we pay in our current system if we are under
Thu Jan 25, 2018, 01:35 AM
Jan 2018

65.

See the bottom of this post for a Wikipedia page that compares health care costs in various countries.

Here are the costs in Sweden which is probably about as expensive as healthcare gets in single payer countries:

1000 kr = US$125 so 100 kr is $12.50

One-day hospital stay 100 kr
Primary care visit 100- 300 kr
Specialist visit 400 kr
12 months of prescriptions (maximum) 2,200 kr

https://transferwise.com/gb/blog/healthcare-system-in-sweden

In addition, in Sweden, apparently healthcare is paid for through municipal taxes according to that article. (I find that hard to believe.)

Costs for health and medical care amounted to approximately 9 percent of Sweden’s gross domestic product in 2005, a figure that remained fairly stable since the early 1980s. By 2015 the cost had risen to 11.9% of GDP -the highest in Europe.[4] Seventy-one percent of health care is funded through local taxation, and county councils have the right to collect income tax. The state finances the bulk of health care costs, with the patient paying a small nominal fee for examination. The state pays for approximately 97% of medical costs.[5]

When a physician declares a patient to be ill for whatever reason (by signing a certificate of illness/unfitness), the patient is paid a percentage of their normal daily wage from the second day. For the first 14 days, the employer is required to pay this wage, and after that the state pays the wage until the patient is declared fit.

(See also the very low infant mortality rate in Sweden on this Wikipedia page.)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Healthcare_in_Sweden

The French health care system is one of universal health care largely financed by government national health insurance. In its 2000 assessment of world health care systems, the World Health Organization found that France provided the "close to best overall health care" in the world.[1] In 2011, France spent 11.6% of GDP on health care, or US$4,086 per capita,[2] a figure much higher than the average spent by countries in Europe but less than in the US. Approximately 77% of health expenditures are covered by government funded agencies.

Most general physicians are in private practice but draw their income from the public insurance funds. These funds, unlike their German counterparts, have never gained self-management responsibility. Instead, the government has taken responsibility for the financial and operational management of health insurance (by setting premium levels related to income and determining the prices of goods and services refunded).[1] The French government generally refunds patients 70% of most health care costs, and 100% in case of costly or long-term ailments. Supplemental coverage may be bought from private insurers, most of them nonprofit, mutual insurers. Until 2000, coverage was restricted to those who contributed to social security (generally, workers or retirees), excluding some poor segments of the population; the government of Lionel Jospin put into place universal health coverage and extended the coverage to all those legally resident in France. Only about 3.7% of hospital treatment costs are reimbursed through private insurance, but a much higher share of the cost of spectacles and prostheses (21.9%), drugs (18.6%) and dental care (35.9%) (figures from the year 2000). There are public hospitals, non-profit independent hospitals (which are linked to the public system), as well as private for-profit hospitals.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care_in_France

Dental care was always included in my single-payer plans. (My dentist in one country was horrified to see that I had mercury in my fillings. Mercury had not been used in that country in fillings for a long time. He took them all out because he said they were dangerous. I don't think dentists use mercury here any more either.) It hasn't been in the plans I have had here unless I paid extra.

Also, there were lots of extras in the European plans that you would pay a lot for here. For instance, when I was in France, the health insurance provided exercise classes for women following birth so that their core muscles could get back into healthy shape. I could not participate because I had a cesarean -- and had to heal the wound but I think that is a great idea. It makes women stronger, and encourages them to exercise throughout their lives.

Here is a comparison of the cost of insurance in the US per capita with other countries:

US: $9,892

France: $4,600

Germany: $5,551 (not the most expensive)

Spain: $3,248

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_total_health_expenditure_per_capita

The cost depends on the cost of living in general in the country, so the pay can be assumed to be higher in the countries in which health insurance is more expensive. (Not so true for the US compared to Germany.)

Remember. Their health insurance includes a lot that ours does not -- not just dental care and exercise classes for French women but detox for alcoholics, etc. that we pay for through other means. Our healthcare is expensive, very expensive which is why single payer here seems too expensive to legislators. It's a vicious circle.

Check out our life expectancy. It is low compared to countries in general that have single payer. I've posted on that before. And our infant mortality rate -- where you really notice that a certain segment of our population does not have adequate, not even adequate healthcare is an embarrassment.

US ---- 5.80 deaths per 1,000 live births.

France ---- 3.20 deaths per 1,000 live births.

Germany ---- 3.40 deaths per 1,000 live births

Greece ---- 4.60 although it is a relatively poor country

https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2091rank.html

I hope you will have a chance to look at these pages. I think I will save this post myself.

We have great healthcare outcomes for those who can afford healthcare insurance and healthcare itself. But . . . . we have so many very, very poor people who are not covered.











DURec leftstreet Jan 2018 #1
This is what we need more of. Talking to experts in other countries about their healthcare systems. PatsFan87 Jan 2018 #2
Yes. Yes. Yes. Sophia4 Jan 2018 #7
Or experts on health care in the US as well as other countries ehrnst Jan 2018 #65
the energy is misdirected on proving the plan is unfeasible. If it were on fixing that plan, JCanete Jan 2018 #180
Yeah, and leveraging online media Bradical79 Jan 2018 #190
oh how I wish burnbaby Jan 2018 #3
Me too. MontanaMama Jan 2018 #103
I know burnbaby Jan 2018 #112
Kick area51 Jan 2018 #4
Thanks for the link. NCTraveler Jan 2018 #93
But... progressoid Jan 2018 #5
Yes, but he's very Democratic! DemocracyMouse Jan 2018 #54
Yes, but MORE popular than any other Democrat... AMONG Democrats! InAbLuEsTaTe Jan 2018 #179
+1 progressoid Jan 2018 #209
Lived in Ontario for 2 years... B Stieg Jan 2018 #6
We waste more money in the military budget than we could even fathom. vsrazdem Jan 2018 #11
The VA is somewhat like single payer -- but a lot more expensive and much, much Sophia4 Jan 2018 #140
Same way we now pay for our healthcare. We work and some of our money goes Sophia4 Jan 2018 #12
Most pharmacies give flu shots for free. sheshe2 Jan 2018 #32
Medicare covers people at the most expensive time in their lives when it comes Sophia4 Jan 2018 #39
I hardly use it yet myself. sheshe2 Jan 2018 #40
Single payer does not cost as much as we pay in our current system if we are under Sophia4 Jan 2018 #41
Medicare was not complicated when it first started. Caliman73 Jan 2018 #130
As I have said so many times, I lived in four different European countries. Sophia4 Jan 2018 #8
Canadian health care saved my life. BobTheSubgenius Jan 2018 #14
I'm with you on that. Sophia4 Jan 2018 #15
- Bigredhunk Jan 2018 #118
And if Canada's system is not as good as Norways.... LiberalLovinLug Jan 2018 #16
Our system is horrible. Sophia4 Jan 2018 #17
And don't let anyone tell you that every other western democracy does not have single payer LiberalLovinLug Jan 2018 #20
Right. Sophia4 Jan 2018 #42
Did any of those countries have 325 million people? France has only 66 million.... George II Jan 2018 #71
Then it should be administered in groups of states, regionally. Sophia4 Jan 2018 #86
You have that backwards. PETRUS Jan 2018 #97
+1000 LiberalLovinLug Jan 2018 #99
Let's try it and find out. Sophia4 Jan 2018 #142
So what's the most people this will work for, Mr Math? SaintLouisBlues Jan 2018 #107
So France has only 1/5 of the tax payers to fund their program which is 1/5 the size of ours? Caliman73 Jan 2018 #131
I've flown on airplanes. Does that make me an expert on air traffic control? ehrnst Jan 2018 #199
Kick dalton99a Jan 2018 #9
K&R mvd Jan 2018 #10
Disclosure saidsimplesimon Jan 2018 #13
Couldn't get it here, no cable. raven mad Jan 2018 #18
Still the frontrunner by some for the 2020 democratic nominee. Sharpshooter007 Jan 2018 #19
Yup LiberalLovinLug Jan 2018 #21
Back to reality. Hillary would have won if she wasn't attacked so much. R B Garr Jan 2018 #23
You agree with me. LiberalLovinLug Jan 2018 #25
It's a totally false narrative. Bernie was never attacked. Hillary was R B Garr Jan 2018 #26
wooooooosh LiberalLovinLug Jan 2018 #27
It certainly isn't a "woooosh". Trying to rewrite history is R B Garr Jan 2018 #28
Ok LiberalLovinLug Jan 2018 #30
Yes, let's not promote false narratives that cannot be addressed properly R B Garr Jan 2018 #33
I see what you did there. sheshe2 Jan 2018 #35
.... R B Garr Jan 2018 #36
;) sheshe2 Jan 2018 #55
.... ehrnst Jan 2018 #113
Hillary would have won -- she did win the popular vote. Sophia4 Jan 2018 #43
I found the hatred for and lies spread about HRC way out of bounds and disgusting ehrnst Jan 2018 #114
I disagree. They could have put something together quickly, and I believe it also would have StevieM Jan 2018 #24
Hillary beat Trump by 3 million votes. Sophia4 Jan 2018 #44
There were a whole lot of things working against a landslide ehrnst Jan 2018 #124
I can't let this go LiberalLovinLug Jan 2018 #196
First off, ehrnst Jan 2018 #201
Reality: Hillary received 4 million more votes than he did. He never ceme close to winning, and got lunamagica Jan 2018 #74
The hypotheses was IF he had won the primary. LiberalLovinLug Jan 2018 #98
Hillary crushed trump on the debates, and I don't see how anyone could have done better lunamagica Jan 2018 #100
Like I said, no one really knows. LiberalLovinLug Jan 2018 #102
But I only ever "no one really knows" only after they have been shown ehrnst Jan 2018 #125
This message was self-deleted by its author R B Garr Jan 2018 #110
IMHO, one needs to get the majority of votes of Democrats in order to beat DT like Hillary did. ehrnst Jan 2018 #126
Not according to Bloombergs survey. sheshe2 Jan 2018 #62
Lots of people are "frontrunners by some." (nt) ehrnst Jan 2018 #64
He's got my vote AGAIN. Weed Man Jan 2018 #75
Not to mention his funny cousin still has his wits about him at 70 LiberalLovinLug Jan 2018 #101
Indeed. It was a geninue surprise to find out they are related. Weed Man Jan 2018 #106
I want to respond but my aggressive support of Hillary might get me in trouble around here Eliot Rosewater Jan 2018 #134
If the cancer doesn't reccur and he becomes transparent concerning his finances ehrnst Jan 2018 #135
Passive agressive bashing of Democrats is still bashing. (nt) ehrnst Jan 2018 #136
And yet were I to be overly supportive of Hillary here I can GUARANTEE attention Eliot Rosewater Jan 2018 #143
Does anyone ask him why Vermont doesn't have single payer? R B Garr Jan 2018 #22
Does anyoneone know how the viewership tally was calculated? lapucelle Jan 2018 #29
I see lots of info about the costs causing huge tax increases, which R B Garr Jan 2018 #31
There would be tax increases. See my post that compares the cost of healthcare Sophia4 Jan 2018 #45
Wiki? R B Garr Jan 2018 #48
If we get single payer, our insurance costs will go down. Sophia4 Jan 2018 #50
Democrats are not the enemy. Republicans are, and R B Garr Jan 2018 #53
Teach! sheshe2 Jan 2018 #59
Yep. We need to be the ones following the recommendations of actual experts ehrnst Jan 2018 #127
Exactly, and all that dogma is what got us Trump, and Trump R B Garr Jan 2018 #148
A lot of Democrats are not persuaded that single payer is a good idea. Sophia4 Jan 2018 #137
ffs, Hillary wasn't negative as she was more realistic. Nothing wrong with R B Garr Jan 2018 #144
Vermont has a tiny population and problems with providing healthcare in any Sophia4 Jan 2018 #149
You keep attacking Hillary, but now it's okay that Vermont doesn't have R B Garr Jan 2018 #155
The population of Vermont is under 700,000. Sophia4 Jan 2018 #165
What we should not do again is blame our candidates R B Garr Jan 2018 #171
I had a wonderful experience with single payer. That doesn't make it feasible here in the US. ehrnst Jan 2018 #161
She had a more realistic and cost effective plan to move towards universal health care ehrnst Jan 2018 #153
Brilliant. Turns out that the main message about single payer was mostly R B Garr Jan 2018 #184
Dogma is dogma. ehrnst Jan 2018 #189
One can Feel deeply about a topic. Knowing about it is another thing entirely. ehrnst Jan 2018 #119
Put it in my post 51 to Sophia. Here ya go sheshe2 Jan 2018 #56
Excellent, she! These words right here: R B Garr Jan 2018 #69
If we can discuss Green Mountain Care as a case study, ehrnst Jan 2018 #128
How much would Vermont's citizens pay for healthcare for all if they all really bought Sophia4 Jan 2018 #146
Bigger than many provinces in Canada, and they did it independently of each other. ehrnst Jan 2018 #169
The Daily Howler (Bob Somerby) is my go-to source lapucelle Jan 2018 #70
Very interesting. Maybe why I have the impression that Kaiser does a better job Sophia4 Jan 2018 #150
Oh! Good catch. I was thinking about the healthcare costs. R B Garr Jan 2018 #37
To expensive. sheshe2 Jan 2018 #34
Absolutely, and it makes you wonder why only Democrats R B Garr Jan 2018 #38
Cheaper than our private insurance system. Sophia4 Jan 2018 #47
I would have prefered some links and facts. sheshe2 Jan 2018 #51
I posted the links and facts above. Sophia4 Jan 2018 #152
Google is our friend. Sophia4 Jan 2018 #181
Hmmm sheshe2 Jan 2018 #60
Why are you arguing against single payer? hueymahl Jan 2018 #81
I think you may be confusing "single payer" with "universal health care" ehrnst Jan 2018 #129
Fair point, but I am not confused hueymahl Jan 2018 #168
Incremental expansion of the ACA. ehrnst Jan 2018 #170
Good post hueymahl Jan 2018 #187
Thx. But I'm not who came up with it. ehrnst Jan 2018 #188
"I just listened." NurseJackie Jan 2018 #200
Our medical costs will go down. Sophia4 Jan 2018 #89
Other countries didn't start from where we are now. ehrnst Jan 2018 #115
of COURSE costs will go down! LiberalLovinLug Jan 2018 #105
Again, the US is not starting at the same place other countries did, or at the time they did. ehrnst Jan 2018 #116
Down. Look at the experiences in other countries which I have posted twice on this Sophia4 Jan 2018 #154
And you fail to understand that the U.S. is very different from other countries ehrnst Jan 2018 #195
Great post Gothmog Jan 2018 #192
Thanks. sheshe2 Jan 2018 #193
Good questions. ehrnst Jan 2018 #194
Thank you, ehrnst sheshe2 Jan 2018 #198
Based on comparing our system to a multitude of foreign systems, it's pretty obvious Sophia4 Jan 2018 #208
But they started in another era, with a different health care system ehrnst Jan 2018 #175
My response..."To Expensive" sheshe2 Jan 2018 #203
May I remind everyone that Medicare insures people at the most expensive time Sophia4 Jan 2018 #207
But look at the real numbers that I posted above. Sophia4 Jan 2018 #151
They started at a very different time in history, with very different health care systems ehrnst Jan 2018 #172
Thank you for all your posts here, ehrnst. sheshe2 Jan 2018 #182
Facts matter. ehrnst Jan 2018 #191
Probably because we all know why already. harun Jan 2018 #67
No Democrats are Kings anywhere. R B Garr Jan 2018 #68
A federal system would not protect women's reproductive rights ehrnst Jan 2018 #121
Hospital Industry, Insurance Industry and Drug Industry harun Jan 2018 #145
Can you point to some examples? ehrnst Jan 2018 #147
Looks as though little has changed since that question was answered in real time. Orsino Jan 2018 #117
Thanks, but we have wiped out a lot of industries over the history of our country. Sophia4 Jan 2018 #156
We don't do these things by passing one law... Orsino Jan 2018 #162
The fact that he refuses to talk about lessons learned from Green Mountain Care ehrnst Jan 2018 #120
states do not have the power to limit medical costs like countries do questionseverything Jan 2018 #202
Does single payer in other countries offer any incentives for healthy behaviors? MadDAsHell Jan 2018 #46
I did not see much morbid obesity when I lived there. People walk a lot and ride Sophia4 Jan 2018 #49
So What? hueymahl Jan 2018 #82
Who said it was my opinion? MadDAsHell Jan 2018 #109
Kaiser makes sure that people on Medicare take some aspirin if they have high Sophia4 Jan 2018 #157
Canada has some programs: ehrnst Jan 2018 #122
I believe England offers incentives, but to medical clinics for promoting positive habits. Caliman73 Jan 2018 #132
As long as we have to have the biggest military and very low taxes, universal Medicare Hoyt Jan 2018 #52
I don't see these things as being mutually exclusive hueymahl Jan 2018 #83
Problem is, we will have to pay for it and as states like Vermont, Colorado, California found out, Hoyt Jan 2018 #85
Medicare already covers the most expensive population when it comes to healthcare Sophia4 Jan 2018 #160
Agree. But, how long do you think it will take to change the whole healthcare system where Hoyt Jan 2018 #174
Good points! Sophia4 Jan 2018 #176
Bringing down prices is way, way more difficult than keeping them low from the start ehrnst Jan 2018 #166
Interesting Points hueymahl Jan 2018 #167
The military isn't what is standing in the way of "Medicare for All" ehrnst Jan 2018 #133
I'd start by having a Public Option. If Medicare is as good as we think, people Hoyt Jan 2018 #138
That was on Hillary's agenda - the public option. ehrnst Jan 2018 #139
The European single payer I had did cover dental ccare. Sophia4 Jan 2018 #159
Mine didn't. But that's not really relevant to a discussion about ehrnst Jan 2018 #173
Ahh, all accounted for I see! MuseRider Jan 2018 #57
Let's see, he helped us out of the TPP ucrdem Jan 2018 #58
Ummhmm. sheshe2 Jan 2018 #61
If DU does the heart thing this year . . . ucrdem Jan 2018 #63
Lol sheshe2 Jan 2018 #204
Was a great session. Well done! harun Jan 2018 #66
I didn't watch it, did he discuss how to pay for the program? Certainly can't compare.... George II Jan 2018 #72
I'd suggest you watch the stream from end to end. Weed Man Jan 2018 #77
When he first introduced this months ago, he neglected to say how it would be paid for... George II Jan 2018 #78
The European systems took money directly out of our paycheck like a payroll tax. Sophia4 Jan 2018 #163
Let's see those tax returns, Bernie. NT Adrahil Jan 2018 #73
1.1 viewers? How did they calculate this number? lunamagica Jan 2018 #76
It never happened. The viewer numbers are a total fabrication. NurseJackie Jan 2018 #79
I think you are right. Had it gotten those numbers, it would be trending on Twitter. It isn't lunamagica Jan 2018 #80
Here are the receipts: TYT - 28K viewers, NowThis News - 6.8K, ATTN - 436 NurseJackie Jan 2018 #91
Thanks. Just as I suspected lunamagica Jan 2018 #92
I found where the unsubstantiated 1-million rumor started... NurseJackie Jan 2018 #94
"I think"? wow...I guess that's enough "proof" for some. Good find, Nurse Jackie lunamagica Jan 2018 #96
The View Count Of 28,000 Me. Jan 2018 #158
Thank you for posting this Gothmog Jan 2018 #178
Why thank you Nurse Jackie. sheshe2 Jan 2018 #205
WOW! So theyre off by 980,000! R B Garr Jan 2018 #206
Care to provide any proof? hueymahl Jan 2018 #84
Actually, it's the extraordinary number claimed that needs proof. There's no evidence... NurseJackie Jan 2018 #87
Got it. hueymahl Jan 2018 #88
And it looks like that the 1.1 million is a guess too. Or a fantasy. Or just a made-up number lunamagica Jan 2018 #90
I just find it interesting hueymahl Jan 2018 #95
Like people who don't believe the actual figures that don't add up to 1.1 million? ehrnst Jan 2018 #141
UHC is possible, even mandatory. Eliot Rosewater Jan 2018 #104
Let's get people behind single payer health insurance and build a majority of Sophia4 Jan 2018 #164
for people who are already there...for people who still aren't sure or haven't heard enough, it is JCanete Jan 2018 #177
... LexVegas Jan 2018 #108
Over a million viewers sounds outrageously unlikely. Hortensis Jan 2018 #111
I'd read somewher these numbers are over inflated.....Bernie's crew should not be pulling a Trump BoneyardDem Jan 2018 #123
Great moral argument, Bernie. What's the long term political strategy that can achieve it? Yavin4 Jan 2018 #183
I don't see how preaching to the choir advances the policy in any way... brooklynite Jan 2018 #185
Someday Bernie needs to run for Senate so he can make this a reality... Blue_Tires Jan 2018 #186
He could take a lesson or two from Hillary Rodham Clinton who actually got affordable health care ehrnst Jan 2018 #197
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bernie Sanders talks univ...»Reply #41