Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

toddwv

(2,830 posts)

25. I suspect that 90% or higher would be about right for white adult males

Reply to Hestia (Reply #19)

Wed Jul 25, 2012, 12:04 PM

Jul 2012

living in urban areas.

However, the problem is that it completely discounts slaves; it was forbidden by law to teach a slave to read. In some areas, the slave population reached 40% of the total population making it virtually impossible that the 90% or higher was realistic except in very specific urban areas that had institutionalized learning available for the masses.

However, I will agree that education was a gem in the US's crown as there definitely was a push to provide more universal education.

That gem has apparently either faded or fallen out completely as anti-intellectualism rears its ugly head and education, just like everything else that has built this country up in the past 100-200 years, is being systematically attacked and dismantled.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

30 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

For the first time in 100 years, women’s IQ scores are better than those for men [View all] kpete Jul 2012 OP

Go back and read some letters written by Civil War soldiers.. Fumesucker Jul 2012 #1

Our literacy rate today is lower than when we were British colonies. n/t Egalitarian Thug Jul 2012 #6

No it's not... toddwv Jul 2012 #9

One thing that we have defiantly lost is Drale Jul 2012 #14

Uh.. whathehell Jul 2012 #26

You would think so wouldn't you? I did. We were wrong. Egalitarian Thug Jul 2012 #15

Back in the mid-1800's, something like 90% of the country was literate, though I think it is higher. Hestia Jul 2012 #19

I suspect that 90% or higher would be about right for white adult males toddwv Jul 2012 #25

Hahahahahaha, right. (nt) Posteritatis Jul 2012 #24

no shit...those people could write! madrchsod Jul 2012 #7

However, a lot of those Civil War soldiers could neither read nor write Art_from_Ark Jul 2012 #8

I bet functional illiteracy isn't far off that percentage today.. Fumesucker Jul 2012 #12

So even with the compulsory educational system Art_from_Ark Jul 2012 #13

It's possible that those who were educated 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #10

They didn't have as much to learn then though. wickerwoman Jul 2012 #20

I think the amount that an educated person could learn was the same 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #22

It's about relative difficulty and percentage though. wickerwoman Jul 2012 #23

Maybe we just spend less time telling girls "Math is hard." DirkGently Jul 2012 #2

That's because Women cbrer Jul 2012 #3

. Liberal_in_LA Jul 2012 #4

Took 100 years to realize that women are more intelligent? n/t RebelOne Jul 2012 #5

Age 15-18 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #11

For the 500th time DFW Jul 2012 #16

It helps when ones brain function broadens beyond the best way to wash & iron. Luminous Animal Jul 2012 #17

LOL! whathehell Jul 2012 #27

Just goes to show the IQ tests were biased malthaussen Jul 2012 #18

Multi-tasking.... How I hate that nonsensical word du jour. MattBaggins Jul 2012 #21

Glad to hear we've started having a good influence on them jberryhill Jul 2012 #28

Oh yea, and I bet you believe in GLOBAL WARMING too! rustydog Jul 2012 #29

I think IQ scores are very subjective. Callmecrazy Jul 2012 #30