Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

StarfishSaver

(18,486 posts)
21. The Court doesn't really "hear the briefs" at this point
Tue Nov 26, 2019, 09:50 AM
Nov 2019

Trump's lawyers will file a petition for a writ of certiorari, asking the Court to take the appeal. The petition will contain arguments and case law supporting it's request, but there are no briefs and no hearing (oral argument). The Court will decide based on that whether to hear the appeal or to let the lower court ruling stand.

Even if the Court decides to take the case, that's no indication of how they'll eventually rule or cause to be concerned that they'll overturn the appellate court ruling that Trump turn over his taxes. In fact, it's possible the Court could take the case in order to shut Trump's immunity arguments down across the board once and for all.

As I wrote a few weeks ago, the appellate court opinion was so carefully and narrowly drafted, the judge left very little for Trump to appeal. And the only issue they can appeal is so clear-cut, it would be difficult for the Supreme Court to find any fault with it. That doesn't mean it won't reverse it or go beyond the narrow ruling - the Court can pretty much do what it wants - but it's unlikely.

By taking it up, I have a feeling they may stop the disclosure. roamer65 Nov 2019 #1
As I. triron Nov 2019 #2
Smells like a 5 to 4 ruling against disclosure coming, I will add. roamer65 Nov 2019 #5
So what is your theory as to why the Court moved up the deadline forTrump to file a cert petition onenote Nov 2019 #13
Good question. roamer65 Nov 2019 #15
Would you be willing to bet on that jberryhill Nov 2019 #9
They haven't agreed to take the case yet. jberryhill Nov 2019 #8
Yep. I'm guessing most of those commenting don't know that the deadline for filing a cert petition onenote Nov 2019 #14
There was no reason for them to intervene Miguelito Loveless Nov 2019 #3
Actually, there was every reason for them to do just what they did StarfishSaver Nov 2019 #11
There were no reported dissents to the decision. onenote Nov 2019 #4
What's depressing about the "fuck the rule of law" contingent here jberryhill Nov 2019 #7
+1 onenote Nov 2019 #10
Sigh ... StarfishSaver Nov 2019 #12
If I may, PRETZEL Nov 2019 #17
Thank you, Pretzel - I'm sure all of the DU lawyers appreciate that! StarfishSaver Nov 2019 #27
You're very welcome, PRETZEL Nov 2019 #31
No - the Circuit Justice who oversees a district doesn't have any more say-so over certiorari StarfishSaver Nov 2019 #32
ok, thanks nt PRETZEL Nov 2019 #33
I have lost all faith in the SC. leftyladyfrommo Nov 2019 #6
This is the real flaw in the system. Biased judges appointed by criminals. BSdetect Nov 2019 #16
SCOTUS justice selection procedure seems OK.. at140 Nov 2019 #29
The procedure sucks. NCLefty Nov 2019 #41
Just beat Trump in 2020 election at140 Nov 2019 #42
If I can remember from the threads when the decision was handed down PRETZEL Nov 2019 #18
Trump originally had until mid-February to file a petition for certiorari onenote Nov 2019 #19
Thanks, wasn't aware of that PRETZEL Nov 2019 #20
The Court doesn't really "hear the briefs" at this point StarfishSaver Nov 2019 #21
Thanks, that makes alot of sense, nt PRETZEL Nov 2019 #22
One minor clarification onenote Nov 2019 #23
Yes. Thanks for that StarfishSaver Nov 2019 #24
Again thanks, PRETZEL Nov 2019 #25
Trump's attorneys. In fact, Mazars is a defendant alongside House Oversight onenote Nov 2019 #36
Thanks, nt PRETZEL Nov 2019 #39
I have said over and over - we can't trust Roberts - he is on their side, not ours. lark Nov 2019 #26
They actually shortened the normal time jberryhill Nov 2019 #28
While that's edifying, you're not very nice donkeypoofed Nov 2019 #34
I don't think "Fuck SCOTUS" is very nice jberryhill Nov 2019 #35
OP was expressing anger; you were expressing disgust donkeypoofed Nov 2019 #37
Anger at a Democratic win? jberryhill Nov 2019 #38
They can't stop it, this is just a few days' delay FakeNoose Nov 2019 #30
Unless SCOTUS grants cert...then they will hear the case in June AncientGeezer Nov 2019 #40
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Fuck SCOTUS for the 10 d...»Reply #21