Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

PRETZEL

(3,245 posts)

25. Again thanks,

Reply to onenote (Reply #23)

Tue Nov 26, 2019, 10:11 AM

Nov 2019

then would that also assume that the House filing would have to be within the same time frame?

Also, and this is somewhat confusing, is it Trump's attorneys filing the briefs or is Mazurs? Or are they one and the same?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

42 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Fuck SCOTUS for the 10 day stay they put on release of Trump's tax returns. [View all] triron Nov 2019 OP

By taking it up, I have a feeling they may stop the disclosure. roamer65 Nov 2019 #1

As I. triron Nov 2019 #2

Smells like a 5 to 4 ruling against disclosure coming, I will add. roamer65 Nov 2019 #5

So what is your theory as to why the Court moved up the deadline forTrump to file a cert petition onenote Nov 2019 #13

Good question. roamer65 Nov 2019 #15

Would you be willing to bet on that jberryhill Nov 2019 #9

They haven't agreed to take the case yet. jberryhill Nov 2019 #8

Yep. I'm guessing most of those commenting don't know that the deadline for filing a cert petition onenote Nov 2019 #14

There was no reason for them to intervene Miguelito Loveless Nov 2019 #3

Actually, there was every reason for them to do just what they did StarfishSaver Nov 2019 #11

There were no reported dissents to the decision. onenote Nov 2019 #4

What's depressing about the "fuck the rule of law" contingent here jberryhill Nov 2019 #7

+1 onenote Nov 2019 #10

Sigh ... StarfishSaver Nov 2019 #12

If I may, PRETZEL Nov 2019 #17

Thank you, Pretzel - I'm sure all of the DU lawyers appreciate that! StarfishSaver Nov 2019 #27

You're very welcome, PRETZEL Nov 2019 #31

No - the Circuit Justice who oversees a district doesn't have any more say-so over certiorari StarfishSaver Nov 2019 #32

ok, thanks nt PRETZEL Nov 2019 #33

I have lost all faith in the SC. leftyladyfrommo Nov 2019 #6

This is the real flaw in the system. Biased judges appointed by criminals. BSdetect Nov 2019 #16

SCOTUS justice selection procedure seems OK.. at140 Nov 2019 #29

The procedure sucks. NCLefty Nov 2019 #41

Just beat Trump in 2020 election at140 Nov 2019 #42

If I can remember from the threads when the decision was handed down PRETZEL Nov 2019 #18

Trump originally had until mid-February to file a petition for certiorari onenote Nov 2019 #19

Thanks, wasn't aware of that PRETZEL Nov 2019 #20

The Court doesn't really "hear the briefs" at this point StarfishSaver Nov 2019 #21

Thanks, that makes alot of sense, nt PRETZEL Nov 2019 #22

One minor clarification onenote Nov 2019 #23

Yes. Thanks for that StarfishSaver Nov 2019 #24

Again thanks, PRETZEL Nov 2019 #25

Trump's attorneys. In fact, Mazars is a defendant alongside House Oversight onenote Nov 2019 #36

Thanks, nt PRETZEL Nov 2019 #39

I have said over and over - we can't trust Roberts - he is on their side, not ours. lark Nov 2019 #26

They actually shortened the normal time jberryhill Nov 2019 #28

While that's edifying, you're not very nice donkeypoofed Nov 2019 #34

I don't think "Fuck SCOTUS" is very nice jberryhill Nov 2019 #35

OP was expressing anger; you were expressing disgust donkeypoofed Nov 2019 #37

Anger at a Democratic win? jberryhill Nov 2019 #38

They can't stop it, this is just a few days' delay FakeNoose Nov 2019 #30

Unless SCOTUS grants cert...then they will hear the case in June AncientGeezer Nov 2019 #40