Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Celerity

(43,501 posts)
Tue Jun 23, 2020, 08:37 AM Jun 2020

AOC Attacked by Super PAC Funded by Primary Opponent's Husband [View all]

Mailers and digital media opposing Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez are being distributed by a super PAC that has received the majority of its funding from Stephen Dizard, the husband of her primary opponent, Michelle Caruso-Cabrera.

https://readsludge.com/2020/06/17/aoc-attacked-by-super-pac-funded-by-primary-opponents-husband/

Congressional candidates and the PACs that donate to them can only legally take a few thousand dollars from individual donors. But PACs that tell the Federal Election Commission that they won’t donate to or coordinate with candidates are allowed to take unlimited amounts of money from donors. Since the contribution limits for outside spending groups were eliminated by a 2010 D.C. Circuit court ruling that came in the wake of the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision, many PACs have tested the limits of how closely they can affiliate with candidates without being considered to be acting in coordination and, thus, no longer allowed to raise unlimited sums from donors. Now, the latest attempt to push the limits has emerged in the race between Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and her Democratic primary challenger, former CNBC correspondent Michelle Caruso-Cabrera.

An organization called Fight for Our Communities PAC reported its first expenditure to the FEC on Tuesday—$28,000 paid to a Pittsburgh video production company called Phenomenon Post for digital media and mailers opposing Ocasio-Cortez. The mailers and digital media were publicly distributed on Tuesday, according to the FEC filing. As of its most recent disclosure covering receipts made prior to April 30, Fight for Our Communities PAC is funded primarily by Caruso-Cabrera’s husband, Stephen Dizard, who donated $30,000 to it in April. Dizard’s donations make up more than 70% of the PAC’s total funding, according to FEC records, and it is more than ten times the amount he would be allowed to give to the Caruso-Cabrera campaign. Fight for Our Communities is required to file an updated donor disclosure on June 20.

snip

Dizard, a managing partner at financial firm Wood Capital, has donated primarily to Republicans. His largest donation prior to his donations to Fight for Our Communities PAC was to a joint fundraising committee in 2014 that benefited the campaigns of six congressional Republicans. Other Republicans he has donated to in recent years include Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.), Sen. Cory Gardner (R-Co.), and Sen. Marco Rubio’s (R-Fla.) 2016 presidential campaign.

The campaign of Caruso-Cabrera, who authored a 2010 book calling for Social Security and Medicare to be replaced with privatized voucher systems, has been heavily backed by Wall Street donors. Her more than $2 million received from contributors include maximum donations from executives at firms including Blackstone, Oaktree Capital Management, Goldman Sachs, and The Carlyle Group. Caruso-Cabrera is also supported by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the powerful business association that generally backs Republicans. Several of Caruso-Cabrera’s donors are also big donors to President Trump, the New York Post recently reported.

snip





back when she was pushing her book, which she was still pushing up until 2018


CNBC's Caruso-Cabrera: Eliminate Departments Of Labor, Commerce, Education And Privatize Social Security

https://crooksandliars.com/heather/cnbcs-caruso-cabrera-eliminate-departments

CNBC anchor Michelle Caruso-Cabrera visited the set of Morning Joe to push her new book You Know I'm Right and apparently we've got another Ayn Rand fan working for CNBC. After saying that the auto companies should have been allowed to fail, presumably to get rid of those pesky over paid union workers, Mike Barnicle asks her if she thinks we're going to have to raise taxes to pay our deficit. Cabrera of course doesn't think we should raise taxes and says that instead we should cut spending. Leslie Stahl asks her where. She replies:






snip

https://books.google.se/books?id=DZRbKtm2FfUC&printsec=frontcover&dq=You+Know+I%27m+Right:+More+Prosperity,+Less+Government+secrecy++banking+secrecy+and+tax+havens+exist&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwie2NCE-ZfqAhVhxIsKHXHBAjgQ6AEwAXoECAEQAg#v=onepage&q&f=false



'Freedom and democracy are best secured when banking secrecy and tax havens exist'




Wall Street takes aim at Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez in party primary

https://www.ft.com/content/580b5830-7f7e-4092-a6f7-7b451e075e10

snip

Ms Caruso-Cabrera, 53, has raised just over $2m, a substantial figure for a challenger, as dozens of chief executives, investors, bankers and lawyers have given the maximum allowable donation of $2,800 each to her primary campaign. Some have given another $2,800 for the general election.

However, Ms Ocasio-Cortez has taken in even more: $10.5m, reflecting the ability of figures on the party’s leftwing — such as Bernie Sanders, her preferred presidential candidate — to attract hundreds of thousands of small donations from contributors nationwide. The median size of her donations is $10, according to an Financial Times analysis of Federal Election Commission filings and the online fundraising platform ActBlue.




While many of Ms Caruso-Cabrera’s supporters raise money for Democrats, several are prominent business backers of President Donald Trump including Ken Langone, the billionaire founder of retailer Home Depot, activist investor Nelson Peltz and John Catsimatidis, who founded the Gristedes grocery chain. 

Larry Lindsey, a Republican economist who served in the George W Bush administration, said: “Michelle knows more about the world and how things work than probably a solid majority of Congress.” He said he had known the challenger for 15 years and wrote her campaign a cheque as soon as he learnt she was running. “She and I would consider ourselves pragmatic libertarians.” 


snip
86 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Your posts are very informative JonLP24 Jun 2020 #1
yw! Celerity Jun 2020 #83
And yet, we're to believe that there is no coordination between Bettie Jun 2020 #2
Wall Streeters back AOCs opponent WHO IS A REPUBLICAN american_ideals Jun 2020 #3
Money Honey Two RhodeIslandOne Jun 2020 #72
It is really sad that some people here support this false flag republican Voltaire2 Jun 2020 #4
Be nice to the people on the way up, because you might meet them again on the way down. OnDoutside Jun 2020 #6
I have no problem with primary contests between Democrats. Voltaire2 Jun 2020 #8
Agree. It's become a trend to slap a D behind your name & run on that ticket. Budi Jun 2020 #11
I wonder if you see the difference... PTWB Jun 2020 #17
And many people here have a huge problem with attacks on Democrats who have toiled long and OnDoutside Jun 2020 #12
- so you support a rightwing extremist pretending to be a Democrat? Voltaire2 Jun 2020 #13
Guess we'll find out after tonight how the people in District 14 feel about it. Budi Jun 2020 #24
This is like a flashback to the Bernie Bros here, in Jan & Feb. Anyone who didn't fall at the feet OnDoutside Jun 2020 #27
She has a right to endorse anyone she wants just as anyone else has a right to endorse whoever they JonLP24 Jun 2020 #29
No, you can be a progressive and not be a Bernie Bro. 99% of Democrats, by the very fact of not OnDoutside Jun 2020 #35
As I said, I am fine with Democrats, real Democrats supporting Democratic Party positions, Voltaire2 Jun 2020 #32
I presume you were vocal here against Bernie then ? OnDoutside Jun 2020 #34
Really? PTWB Jun 2020 #10
"DARES to speak truth to power" Lol. That's one way of putting it. Firing balls of shit, at fellow OnDoutside Jun 2020 #18
I want us, as Democrats, to be better. PTWB Jun 2020 #22
Then hope she stops attacking Democrats !!! That's the point. OnDoutside Jun 2020 #30
If you don't know enough about her opponent... PTWB Jun 2020 #36
It's irrelevant. The issue is that the AOC supporters here are pissed at other posters who are not OnDoutside Jun 2020 #42
It has nothing to do with not showing unwavering support. PTWB Jun 2020 #57
I think it's fair to say that many people here would be happier with Badrun Khan rather than OnDoutside Jun 2020 #69
You'd be mistaken. PTWB Jun 2020 #71
No, it isn't simply because they don't like that progressive Democrat. You seem to think that OnDoutside Jun 2020 #73
I prefer she stay the same JonLP24 Jun 2020 #23
She said "Pelosi was targeting "newly elected women of colour"" OnDoutside Jun 2020 #33
the ironic thing is that the real hardcore lefties (the ones who are far to the left of even most Celerity Jun 2020 #37
Interesting that some ignore the fact that both MCC and Badrun Khan are WOC. George II Jun 2020 #74
Indeed. OnDoutside Jun 2020 #75
So some are blaming people who aren't 110% behind her because, in part.... George II Jun 2020 #78
Lol ! OnDoutside Jun 2020 #80
MCC is a woman of color too, as is Badrun Khan. Why hold that up for one and not the other two? George II Jun 2020 #46
I'll answer that (very easy) question if you ever answer mine. PTWB Jun 2020 #53
And you will still be waiting, based on the reasons I've already given you a couple of times. George II Jun 2020 #54
Yes, the reason being you don't want to paint yourself in a corner. PTWB Jun 2020 #55
No, I simply do not answer hypotheticals about something that will never happen. George II Jun 2020 #56
Because you don't want to expose a hypocritical position you've taken. PTWB Jun 2020 #59
Make up your own reasons for why I do or don't do something, that's your prerogative.... George II Jun 2020 #61
I'm just making the best guess I can ... PTWB Jun 2020 #62
I'll tell you what, when donald trump switches parties and becomes a Democrat ask me again. Fair? George II Jun 2020 #65
No, it is (or should be) just as easy for you to answer right now. PTWB Jun 2020 #67
I don't see the point in answering any question you might whimsically come up with.... George II Jun 2020 #68
So you keep saying. PTWB Jun 2020 #70
Since we're talking about stupid hypotheticals... SidDithers Jun 2020 #76
No, I wouldn't. PTWB Jun 2020 #77
The attacking goes both ways JonLP24 Jun 2020 #19
That's about policy, and I agree, that's perfectly fine to criticise. No problem with that. OnDoutside Jun 2020 #28
Jon UBI Makes Sense DanieRains Jun 2020 #82
This clash of big PAC titans is why I support Badrun Khan Budi Jun 2020 #5
Badrun Khan is her name Celerity Jun 2020 #14
Typo..thanks. I could care less that her chances are slim. Budi Jun 2020 #21
AOC has national appeal, look at the chart that shows her average contribution, it is only 10 USD, Celerity Jun 2020 #25
Which is precisely why the argument about MCC's outside money is a moot point Budi Jun 2020 #31
it is not a moot point if you look at the overall agenda behind many of her largest donors & backers Celerity Jun 2020 #38
Why I'm supporting Khan. I'm going for the little gal. Budi Jun 2020 #43
There are many AOC haters right here on DU who are supporting her opponent PTWB Jun 2020 #7
"afraid of AOC, a woman of color in a position of power who DARES to speak truth to power." jcgoldie Jun 2020 #15
Michelle Caruso Cabrera is also a woman of color DenverJared Jun 2020 #48
..who stands for almost everything democrats do not. jcgoldie Jun 2020 #52
She's a radical right wing ultra conservative Republican PTWB Jun 2020 #60
MCC was pushing that book she wrote in 2010 as of 2018. She also rented from Trump until 2019 Autumn Jun 2020 #16
There was a DUer defending that just last night... PTWB Jun 2020 #20
Some have hated AOC since the day she was elected. Autumn Jun 2020 #26
must be hard to harass her when each of her tweets gets a bazillion replies Celerity Jun 2020 #39
I'll correct that. He thinks he harasses her on twitter Autumn Jun 2020 #40
lol Celerity Jun 2020 #41
Wow, I can actually see all the replies! demmiblue Jun 2020 #9
not me ...65 out of 80 questionseverything Jun 2020 #81
Yeah, I spoke too soon. demmiblue Jun 2020 #84
Much ado about nothing DenverJared Jun 2020 #44
Yes Warren was a Republican Trumpocalypse Jun 2020 #45
It took 14 years for Sen Warren DenverJared Jun 2020 #47
Then we should wait to see that evolution before voting for a prediction based on nothing. CountMyVote4Reality Jun 2020 #49
No need to wait DenverJared Jun 2020 #50
No she needs to prove herself first. Trumpocalypse Jun 2020 #79
Yes it did Trumpocalypse Jun 2020 #51
If you think Liz Warren is the darling of progressives you don't know many progressives. aidbo Jun 2020 #58
you are vastly overstating Warren's 'Republicaness' and vastly underplaying Caruso-Cabrera's Celerity Jun 2020 #63
Some here are thrilled to support that DINO Marrah_Goodman Jun 2020 #64
What's fair is fair... if AOC and crew can go after Engel, this isn't any different. Blasphemer Jun 2020 #66
and they did! RandiFan1290 Jun 2020 #85
They did and it was different. Voltaire2 Jun 2020 #86
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»AOC Attacked by Super PAC...