Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Has the Supreme Court Gone Overboard in How It Favors Religion? [View all]
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/08/opinion/supreme-court-religion.htmlNo paywall
https://archive.li/C126M
This term, the Supreme Court decided two cases involving religion: Groff v. DeJoy was a relatively low-profile case about religious accommodations at work; 303 Creative v. Elenis was a blockbuster case about the clash between religious exercise and principles of equal treatment. (The legal question was technically about speech, but religion was at the core of the dispute.)
In both cases, plaintiffs asserted religiously grounded objections to complying with longstanding and well-settled laws or rules that would otherwise apply to them. And in both, the court handed the plaintiff a resounding victory.
These cases are the latest examples of a striking long-term trend: Especially since Amy Coney Barrett became a justice in 2020, the court has taken a sledgehammer to a set of practices and compromises that have been carefully forged over decades to balance religious freedom with other important and sometimes countervailing principles.
The First Amendments establishment clause was once understood to place limits on the governments involvement with or facilitation of religion, but those limits appear to have been smashed. This legal demolition has been accompanied by the demotion of other important principles like equality, public health and simple fairness in law, resulting in a disorienting imbalance of values in American society.
*snip*
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
34 replies, 2257 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (39)
ReplyReply to this post
34 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Considering there is no empirical, objective evidence for anything religion avers as truth,
Sibelius Fan
Jul 2023
#2
Court decissions are creaating a favored class and those whose world-view gets no priviledge
sanatanadharma
Jul 2023
#4
Right. Because a Pastafarian or a Wiccan won't get the same treatment from this court.
erronis
Jul 2023
#14
Do away with separation of church and state. So government can establish a state religion?
onenote
Jul 2023
#18
Brush up on what separation of church and state has done to protect religious minorities.
onenote
Jul 2023
#25
Yes, and for all the reasons above, they should literally be thrown overboard thru SCOTUS expansion.
ancianita
Jul 2023
#23
Absolutely. And only one particular view of one particular side of Christianity.
paleotn
Jul 2023
#29