Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Bayard

(22,369 posts)

7. Terrifying, isn't it?

Reply to Coventina (Original post)

Tue Nov 7, 2023, 01:43 PM

Nov 2023

I want to put Biden and Harris in bullet-proof bubbles.

I could see it as another way to install trump again if Johnson was completely in charge.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

15 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Am I understanding this correctly? Mike Johnson is 3rd in line for POTUS [View all] Coventina Nov 2023 OP

Second in line. n/t John1956PA Nov 2023 #1

OK, I was counting the sitting POTUS as #1. Coventina Nov 2023 #2

National security is the new oxymoron. cbabe Nov 2023 #3

Yep, your point is well taken. n/t LuckyCharms Nov 2023 #4

I'm not sure what you are referring to...?? themaguffin Nov 2023 #5

He has some firm called "Covenant Eyes" looking at all his devices to see what he does Coventina Nov 2023 #6

Does this sound oddly like "sponsor" ? CincyDem Nov 2023 #9

It's different from having a sponsor. yardwork Nov 2023 #11

I don't think it applies to his Government devices... brooklynite Nov 2023 #13

So he has a firm, but not a bank account. That makes sense. Also this doesn't sound like grift at all... themaguffin Nov 2023 #14

Terrifying, isn't it? Bayard Nov 2023 #7

tiny was an even bigger threat...... getagrip_already Nov 2023 #8

He's weird as shit, but I don't know that he is saying he has that tracking app Cuthbert Allgood Nov 2023 #10

Counting the President, yes. Iggo Nov 2023 #12

Too bad it's not Mike Pence. GreenWave Nov 2023 #15

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Am I understanding this c...»Reply #7