This does not mean the entire indictment is dismissed. See State v. Cerajewski, 347 Ga. App. 454, 457 (2018). The State may also seek a reindictment supplementing these six counts. C.f. O.C.G.A. § 17-7-53.1 (barring future prosecution after second quashal). Even if the statute of limitations has expired, the State receives a six-month extension from the date of this Order to resubmit the case to a grand jury. See O.C.G.A. § 17-3-3. Nor is it inevitable, presuming the State presents the appropriate motion, that the identity of future grand jurors will be publicly accessible. See, e.g., Order to Seal Page 22 of Indictment, 2023-EX-001124 (Sep. 1, 2023) (granting ex parte motion to redact grand juror names). This is an area of law where federal courts have achieved greater efficiency, and one might wish that future grand jurors could be spared this inconvenience for something so easily remedied. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 7(f) (allowing government filing of a bill of particulars to inform a defendant of the charges in sufficient detail to minimize surprise at trial). But Georgia law currently provides no such option. See Ward v. State, 188 Ga. App. 372, 373 (1988) (“A ‘bill of particulars’ is not a recognized pleading[.]”). Alternatively, the State may request a certificate of immediate review pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 5-7-2 which the Court would likely grant due to the lack of precedential authority. See State v. Outen, 289 Ga. 579, 581 (2011) (finding dismissal of less than all counts of indictment not a final order for purposes of State’s automatic right to appeal).