Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
There should be a means test that would keep people like my dad from drawing it. As I told him many times ... marble falls Mar 23 #1
Actually it was designed to even give money to the wealthy. The strength of its support was it was not need based karynnj Mar 23 #15
You said what I was going to say TxGuitar Mar 23 #28
this is exactly y i oppose scrapping the cap. mopinko Mar 23 #16
There is no reason to keep the payments Voltaire2 Mar 23 #41
changing that changes the whole thing. mopinko Mar 23 #48
No it doesn't. It changes one aspect. Voltaire2 Mar 23 #53
No it doesn't. That's ridiculous. Voltaire2 Mar 23 #61
that was teddy kennedy's take. mopinko Mar 23 #76
Well Biden's 'take' is eliminate the cap for Voltaire2 Mar 23 #79
u got a link for that? mopinko Mar 23 #80
Sure. Voltaire2 Mar 23 #81
that's medicare, not fica. it never had a cap. mopinko Mar 23 #82
and this isnt 'scrap the cap' mopinko Mar 23 #83
It actually is. It is the long standing Democratic platform Voltaire2 Mar 23 #99
no it isnt. mopinko Mar 23 #104
No it is also Medicare. Voltaire2 Mar 23 #97
. mopinko Mar 23 #106
Some comments. jaxexpat Mar 23 #66
Lol. You must be present on your cellphone this morning!? KPN Mar 23 #68
Thanks The Bopper Mar 23 #86
if teddy kennedy's position is a rw talking point now, mopinko Mar 23 #92
There's no reason there cant be a cap on payouts too. oldsoftie Mar 23 #121
Social security income is Progressive dog Mar 23 #128
Payments are tied to contributions OrangeJoe Mar 23 #132
Also Rebl2 Mar 23 #19
I paid into my SS for 40 years.... TxGuitar Mar 23 #27
When you drive your insured car with no claims, should the insurance company give you back your payments ... marble falls Mar 23 #59
Are you including employer's share in your totals? jaxexpat Mar 23 #72
Um no. And by no I mean no fucking way. Voltaire2 Mar 23 #36
Employer's share OrangeJoe Mar 23 #134
A means test makes it a form of welfare drmeow Mar 23 #37
employers put in the same amount as u. mopinko Mar 23 #50
Disagree TimeToGo Mar 23 #47
My husband died at 70 BonnieJW Mar 23 #62
I'm sorry for your loss. area51 Mar 23 #137
I don't see it that way Skittles Mar 24 #141
As soon as that is done, SS becomes an entitlement and not an earned benefit. LiberalArkie Mar 23 #65
It is an entitlement means you ARE entitled to receive the benefit that you JohnSJ Mar 23 #110
It's an entitlement because Congress passed a law saying you're entitled to it. Igel Mar 23 #114
You are entitled to it because you have been paying into it. As for your JohnSJ Mar 23 #116
I've never understood the negative connotation with "entitled" oldsoftie Mar 23 #120
No means test. It will destroy SS...raise taxes so the rich pay their fair share. Demsrule86 Mar 23 #71
The asses who want to raise the age to 70 or 85 are the same ones who would never hire anyone over 50. CousinIT Mar 23 #88
Bill Gates & Donad trump dont need SS. oldsoftie Mar 23 #123
Nope. Freethinker65 Mar 23 #130
Right on, raising retirement age is not the only fix available. Take the income cap off SS taxes. And... dutch777 Mar 23 #2
imho the best fix is to include capital gains. mopinko Mar 23 #17
Totally agree drmeow Mar 23 #40
Holy crap! It's only March. Your partner must make bank. jimfields33 Mar 23 #51
This was for last year, not this year! drmeow Mar 23 #69
Thanks. I wish you both well! jimfields33 Mar 23 #101
my ex hit the cap early every yr for decades. mopinko Mar 23 #78
A MAGA Republican retiree will say they won't cut our SS, it's the future doc03 Mar 23 #3
Yes, exactly. Mariana Mar 23 #57
The actual age at which a person can collect SS PoindexterOglethorpe Mar 23 #4
That's wrong. Your SS benefits are taxable Voltaire2 Mar 23 #42
true but not true Tickle Mar 23 #45
Your income is always taxable. Voltaire2 Mar 23 #49
I mean no disrespect Tickle Mar 23 #58
Yours won't be if your other income Voltaire2 Mar 23 #60
If you go over a certain amount of income Lifeafter70 Mar 23 #67
Could it be they were refering to state taxes? Lifeafter70 Mar 23 #84
Taxable and actually losing $1.00 for each $2.00 earned over a set amount PoindexterOglethorpe Mar 23 #113
oh it's always been upon us since the day it started Tickle Mar 23 #5
The 401K, I think, was designed by big corporations as a way to avoid giving actual pensions. viva la Mar 23 #11
When 401k first came out my employer said this Emile Mar 23 #22
My employer sneakily went from a 5-year vesting in the pension to 10 years.... viva la Mar 23 #35
Cut the crap- raise the cap. FalloutShelter Mar 23 #6
Heard Raise The Cap For Decades modrepub Mar 23 #7
it gets raised every year, but somehow it's not part of the convo. mopinko Mar 23 #18
It gets COLA every year. Voltaire2 Mar 23 #43
How are Republicans going to be able to afford those huge tax cuts for the wealthy??? RAB910 Mar 23 #8
Remove the caps. Let rich people pay their fair share. Meadowoak Mar 23 #9
that is far in excess of what's needed. mopinko Mar 23 #20
No reason to not cap benefits. Voltaire2 Mar 23 #44
except that it changes the fundamentals of the program. mopinko Mar 23 #52
It may be in excess of what we need, but why should we Meadowoak Mar 23 #105
cuz it's a basic program for basic protection. mopinko Mar 23 #107
How much of a business owners revenue comes from Meadowoak Mar 23 #112
And life expectancy for people who don't work in comfort... viva la Mar 23 #10
You didn't mention the other part that raised my hackles; killing the widow(ers) and children's benefit. flying_wahini Mar 23 #12
You're quite right. I didn't try to expose all their intentions, though. I don't type well. jaxexpat Mar 23 #21
we only get half, anyway. mopinko Mar 23 #23
I wonder how much Social Security saved because of Covid? CanonRay Mar 23 #13
it night b offset by increased disability. mopinko Mar 23 #24
Decline in life expectancy due to COVID-19 (CDC) Bo Zarts Mar 23 #31
All the people who weren't working because their place of employment shut down didn't pay anything into SS MichMan Mar 23 #32
Life expectancy is longer because infant mortality Emile Mar 23 #14
Also, women's life expectancy is improved by modern prenatal care. It's an easier world to grow up in. jaxexpat Mar 23 #30
Exactly, another great point. Emile Mar 23 #33
Your math doesn't work. Igel Mar 23 #118
Don't understand a single sentence. Can you rephrase? jaxexpat Mar 23 #136
Wow DENVERPOPS Mar 23 #63
It raised one year out of the last twenty. Emile Mar 23 #85
Thx DENVERPOPS Mar 23 #98
Depends greatly on part of the country JT45242 Mar 23 #87
Thx DENVERPOPS Mar 23 #93
It should have been a lock box from day one - nobody raiding it for anything else. TBF Mar 23 #25
The only presidential candidate I know of to ever use the "SS lock-box" as a campaign plank was Al Gore. jaxexpat Mar 23 #34
It hasn't been raided. Voltaire2 Mar 23 #46
Is there somewhere DENVERPOPS Mar 23 #74
Google. Igel Mar 23 #119
If you think it has not been raided where in the hell have you been? Stargazer99 Mar 23 #127
It is interesting DENVERPOPS Mar 23 #138
Most successful social program of all time Johnny2X2X Mar 23 #26
And how are you supposed to survive after age 65 no_hypocrisy Mar 23 #29
repubs have told DownriverDem Mar 23 #38
Republicans need to practice what they preach and refuse SS benefits as a matter of personal ethics. Chainfire Mar 23 #55
It is an entitlement. You are entitled to a payment because you have been paying JohnSJ Mar 23 #108
The SSA disagrees. Igel Mar 23 #122
The benefit base for 2024 is $168,600 Shermann Mar 23 #39
Good point except it seems to play into the falsehood that Social Security is a tax based program. jaxexpat Mar 23 #75
False dichotomy, it can be a contribution to a benefit program and be a tax. Shermann Mar 23 #100
A lifetime record of taxes paid will not determine your monthly SS retirement check. jaxexpat Mar 23 #109
Form W-2 Box 4: Social security tax withheld Shermann Mar 23 #117
You retirement money could be better spent by the wealthy on necessities like yachts and vacation homes. Chainfire Mar 23 #54
Republicans want old, hungry, desperate and are willing to work cheap labor pool Emile Mar 23 #56
Okay, let's start with the foundations... GiqueCee Mar 23 #64
Absolutely love the passion-n-logic of your rant, GC. I think I'll go out onto the balmy patio's 75 and think on it. jaxexpat Mar 23 #77
Central Vermont... GiqueCee Mar 23 #90
It's a burden. jaxexpat Mar 23 #95
That's why we need to put trump back. Turbineguy Mar 23 #70
Every percent Traildogbob Mar 23 #73
I'm one of those who had to wait until 67 and I am LIVID. CousinIT Mar 23 #89
I got mine so screw you is a republican trait. Emile Mar 23 #91
Absolutely. I hear it from them every day. That, and.. CousinIT Mar 23 #94
General information about Social Security for the curious Silver Swan Mar 23 #96
That can't be right. Igel Mar 23 #124
Everyone who pays into social security deserves to get social security regardless of income. What JohnSJ Mar 23 #102
Exactly right FakeNoose Mar 23 #139
I am not in favor... Mike Nelson Mar 23 #103
We ascend a slippery slope when we oblige a political institution to define "need". jaxexpat Mar 23 #111
These seem to be contradictory MichMan Mar 23 #131
Bet money we'll still be sitting here in 10 years with little or nothing done to bolster SS. Raising the cap appreciably Silent Type Mar 23 #115
I started collecting at 62 for 3 reasons. oldsoftie Mar 23 #125
Should go by life expectancy for 21 year olds Kaleva Mar 23 #126
It shouldn't go by life expectancy. Elessar Zappa Mar 24 #142
Why is 65 or 67 the magic number? Kaleva Mar 24 #143
George Carlin once said orangecrush Mar 23 #129
Smart bettors do not argue with Carlin's ghost. jaxexpat Mar 23 #135
What killed men off when SS was devised was alcohol Warpy Mar 23 #133
Lower the retirement age and expand the benefit. Tactical Peek Mar 24 #140
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Social Security and the l...»Reply #65