Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Goodheart

(5,325 posts)

2. Man, no joke

Reply to brooklynite (Reply #1)

Wed Mar 27, 2024, 10:47 AM

Mar 27

I don't see much similarity there. Even in the provided picture there's another span parallel to the Minneapolis bridge that could be used to mitigate the disaster... nothing similar exists in Baltimore.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Lessons for Baltimore: How Minneapolis recovered from its I-35W bridge collapse 17 years ago [View all] ProudMNDemocrat Mar 27 OP

Not entirely relevant... brooklynite Mar 27 #1

Man, no joke Goodheart Mar 27 #2

But there is a relationship between the two. MineralMan Mar 27 #3

If it was built over water it can be removed over water. No problem. n/t. Scruffy1 Mar 27 #8

But the bridge in Baltimore was first bumped by the ship, no? question everything Mar 27 #4

Bumped? PoindexterOglethorpe Mar 27 #7

The closest to something like this Deep State Witch Mar 27 #5

And it took 7 years to replace... nt mitch96 Mar 27 #11

Very different bridges, of course; but I think the point of the article Ocelot II Mar 27 #6

About the bridge, itself... It sure looks like it was built on the cheap Goodheart Mar 27 #9

The bridge was built 50 years ago for a different world. localroger Mar 27 #10

Maybe ships with cargo should not be allowed past that point? LiberalFighter Mar 27 #12