Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I'm no longer certain of OJ's guilt [View all]Hekate
(91,397 posts)15. One in billions chance of a match with someone else means there were NO scientific issues...
There were only defense-lawyer issues. Like handing OJ the glove shrunken in dried blood, and proclaiming If the glove dont fit, you must acquit.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
111 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I do not wish to--and will not insult you... You are free to develop and hold your own opinions...
hlthe2b
Apr 11
#1
One in billions chance of a match with someone else means there were NO scientific issues...
Hekate
Apr 11
#15
And the shoe prints that matched only 2 people in all of Los Angeles County.
Liberty Belle
Apr 11
#56
There is zero evidence that the LAPD planted any evidence in the OJ case,
MarineCombatEngineer
Apr 11
#7
There's zero benefit of the doubt given to the LAPD now and even less than by people of color
uponit7771
Apr 11
#25
So the jury in the civil trial was wrong that OJ was liable for the death of Goldman?
MarineCombatEngineer
Apr 11
#27
Trusting the LAPD when it comes to people of color is like trusting Trump when it comes to mone.
uponit7771
Apr 11
#29
You didn't answer my question, was the civil jury wrong in holding him liable for the death of Goldman?
MarineCombatEngineer
Apr 11
#32
I think I did answer the question... It was wrong if the LAPD was involved in any way
uponit7771
Apr 11
#34
Goldman was not her boyfriend. Your whole theory is a bit farfetched, I'm afraid.
shrike3
Apr 11
#21
A woman is more in danger from her intimate partner than anyone else. Like you said, unfortunately.
shrike3
Apr 12
#96
I always figured it would take 2 people to run 2000 yards in a 14 game season.
dem4decades
Apr 11
#39
Curious, ever own a pair of Bruno Maglis? They leave a distinctive blood print.
dem4decades
Apr 11
#43
I remember reading that his wife kept some photos in a safe that were taken after he had beaten her.
jalan48
Apr 11
#24
Shocking thing is people on DU believe the LAPD was on the up and up back then when it came to black people
uponit7771
Apr 11
#26
Manson is white, we both know that the LAPD treats white people better than PoC in LA...
uponit7771
Apr 11
#63
The shocking this are the people who want to make excuses for a serial domestic abuser.
Happy Hoosier
Apr 12
#94
Yes, this is accurate. OJ was the whitest black man in Cali. He was known as being a friend to cops
ms liberty
Apr 11
#45
Someone I met said she'd attended a party where both O.J. and Nicole were present.
shrike3
Apr 12
#97
That is a fact that some have not reckoned with. OJ the football hero was a favored man in LA
Hekate
Apr 11
#70
An acquaintance told me she'd attended a birthday party that Nicole and O.J. attended separately.
shrike3
Apr 11
#88
I thought he was innocent. But after the glove fit. Not immediately but later considered him guilty.
LiberalFighter
Apr 11
#71
You have no EVIDENCE that OJ is innocent, and no EVIDENCE that LAPD "planted" something.
brooklynite
Apr 11
#77