Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

The Northerner

(5,040 posts)
Tue Jan 31, 2012, 03:20 AM Jan 2012

Civilian Deaths Due to Drones are Not Many, Obama Says [View all]

WASHINGTON — President Obama on Monday defended the use of drones to strike suspected terrorists in Pakistan and elsewhere, saying the clandestine program was “kept on a very tight leash” and enabled the United States to use “pinpoint” targeting to avoid more intrusive military action.

Mr. Obama, in an unusually candid public discussion of the Central Intelligence Agency’s covert program, said the drone strikes had not inflicted huge civilian casualties. “We are very careful in terms of how it’s been applied,” he said. “It is important for everybody to understand that this thing is kept on a very tight leash.”

The president made the remarks in answer to questions posed by people during a live Web interview sponsored by Google Plus, the social media site of Google. He also spoke about the economy, laughed at a comedian’s impersonation of him, and declined a woman’s request to sing or do a dance.

The subject of drones came up when a viewer asked Mr. Obama about a report in The New York Times on Monday about the State Department’s use of drones for surveillance purposes to protect its diplomatic installations in Iraq. Mr. Obama confirmed their use for surveillance, but said he thought the article was “a little overwritten.” He added that drones were a key part of the country’s offensive against Al Qaeda.

Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/31/world/middleeast/civilian-deaths-due-to-drones-are-few-obama-says.html

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
.............. Angry Dragon Jan 2012 #1
the dead civilians will be glad to hear they are "not many" - executed without charges or trial msongs Jan 2012 #2
Agreed & I also wonder if someone here is willing to defend this policy... The Northerner Jan 2012 #4
Cold man. Can fascist be added? K&R (nt) T S Justly Jan 2012 #3
The American people love war, gotta appeal to the 60% who want war with Iran... joshcryer Jan 2012 #5
What American people want war with Iran? A link will do nicely. Thanks. (nt) T S Justly Jan 2012 #6
Here's two: joshcryer Jan 2012 #7
Looks like a couple of colonels in Alexandria, Va and another one in Tel Aviv ... T S Justly Jan 2012 #9
Eh, best I can do. joshcryer Jan 2012 #10
Goodnight ... T S Justly Jan 2012 #11
One is too many. Norrin Radd Jan 2012 #8
I agree and it should not be addressed so lightly. morningfog Jan 2012 #19
Is that how it was easy for you to make jokes about them, sir? Their use is no big deal? BlueIris Jan 2012 #12
I could fill your screen with photos of dead children from those drones. Bonobo Jan 2012 #13
Politicians speak in relative terms and miss the heart of the matter lunatica Jan 2012 #14
"I think people who are outraged at this but can accept outright war are just as bad." Bonobo Jan 2012 #16
How about the politicians and pundits and even the military lunatica Jan 2012 #18
This is patently untrue EFerrari Jan 2012 #15
Over 168 children died in Pakistan by the drone war. Galle Jan 2012 #17
In exactly the same way Mittens' $374,000 in speaking fees hifiguy Jan 2012 #20
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Civilian Deaths Due to Dr...