Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Should the US have gotten involved in Europe in WWII? [View all]
No, in many ways Syria doesn't compare to the European war in the 1930s and 1940s. But I'm curious as to how DUers feel about this.
11 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited | |
Yes, we should have gotten involved | |
9 (82%) |
|
We should have stayed out | |
2 (18%) |
|
0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
31 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
With a qualifier, the US entered the war on the European front after Germany declared war
nadinbrzezinski
Sep 2013
#2
According to Gallup, 62% thought "defeating Germany is more important than staying out"
Renew Deal
Sep 2013
#10
to all those who think we were just minding our own business and the war came to us:
unblock
Sep 2013
#15
We were not 'actively' aiding the Soviets (nor 'passively' aiding them either, except
HardTimes99
Sep 2013
#18
Yes. Pearl Harbor was attacked and Hitler was known to have killed Jewish with chemical weapons
David Krout
Sep 2013
#25