General Discussion

Response to geek tragedy (Reply #21)

Name removed Message auto-removed

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

50 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Ten boys arrested for child porn distribution connected to Snapchat [View all] Ohio Joe Nov 2013 OP

That goes double... Benton D Struckcheon Nov 2013 #1

Good that theywere arrested. Maybe others will think twice instead of doing this next time. nt tblue37 Nov 2013 #2

Didn't the girls "produce" the images? 1000words Nov 2013 #3

Reallly? You are going to blame the victim? Ohio Joe Nov 2013 #4

I'm parsing the law 1000words Nov 2013 #5

No. You are blaming the victim and it is a shitty thing to do Ohio Joe Nov 2013 #7

So ... I take it I won't be receiving a holiday card from you this year? 1000words Nov 2013 #9

Objective... Your defense of what these boys did is fucked up Ohio Joe Nov 2013 #11

Happy Holidays! 1000words Nov 2013 #13

What exactly is the law that you are "parsing"? etherealtruth Nov 2013 #29

A just law is enforced consistently 1000words Nov 2013 #47

You need to research the laws regarding child porn more carefully NickB79 Nov 2013 #27

ya, he is really going to go there. each and every one of his posts, go there. consistently. seabeyond Nov 2013 #35

Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #6

Read the article Ohio Joe Nov 2013 #8

Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #17

it was distributed to other boys WITHOUT THEIR CONSENT. geek tragedy Nov 2013 #19

Consent doesn't matter NickB79 Nov 2013 #32

girls have also been prosecuted for their own statutory rape geek tragedy Nov 2013 #37

I was wrong regarding the law NickB79 Nov 2013 #44

peace nt geek tragedy Nov 2013 #45

Are you really that cluesless? Ohio Joe Nov 2013 #22

Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #24

And the stupid boys chose to not delete them but pass them on without the consent uppityperson Nov 2013 #25

Are you ignoring the part where the boys sent those pictures to other boys geek tragedy Nov 2013 #28

So, if theoretically the girls did give permission, it's not child porn? NickB79 Nov 2013 #33

It's about possession and distribution leftstreet Nov 2013 #23

Unbelievable--a jury voted 1-5 to keep this apologia for child porn. geek tragedy Nov 2013 #12

I wish I could say I was surprised BainsBane Nov 2013 #20

internet creepers are ubiquitous, unfortunately nt geek tragedy Nov 2013 #21

Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #30

nothing surprises me any more etherealtruth Nov 2013 #31

no. mra talking points, child porn, schoolgirls underpants sold to grown men are huge thumbs up. but seabeyond Nov 2013 #39

What next, arguing that statutory rape victims should be prosecuted as geek tragedy Nov 2013 #10

Slut shaming is not very liberal. nt HijackedLabel Nov 2013 #14

This isn't that, it's just good old fashioned victim-blaming. geek tragedy Nov 2013 #15

Aren't tweenagers/teenagers desperate for approval or to be grown up? haele Nov 2013 #16

You are unbelievable! In_The_Wind Nov 2013 #18

The most basic elements of the law escape you. BainsBane Nov 2013 #26

Are Canadian laws the same as U.S. laws? cali Nov 2013 #34

They did not give permission to distribute, the boys distributed without their consent uppityperson Nov 2013 #36

So, if they did give permission, this wouldn't be child porn? NickB79 Nov 2013 #40

I suppose you'd be the type to blame rape victims because they dressed a certain way. Vashta Nerada Nov 2013 #41

Apparently Canada has some very sane laws NickB79 Nov 2013 #42

Thanks, Nick. 1000words Nov 2013 #49

I'm no attorney rrneck Nov 2013 #48

It must be terrifying to raise kids nowadays. CFLDem Nov 2013 #38

If I were raising kids in the US nowadays, Art_from_Ark Nov 2013 #50

A bunch of predators arrested for being predators. NuclearDem Nov 2013 #43

This won't be the last we hear of criminal activity on Snapchat. calendargirl Nov 2013 #46