Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)"My Facebook Note Re: Phil Robertson" [View all]
My Facebook Note Re: Phil Robertson
by Jaxpagan
Aside from actually catching occasional snippets, I've never watched Duck Dynasty, despite being from that state, and that part of the state, and that town (Monroe, La). Or maybe because of that - I grew up with people like them, and I saw this "flip-side" of the folksy humor a long time ago. Kinda done with it.
But after Phil Robertson spewed all over his GQ interview, my Facebook page (which carries an amazing diverse array of people, at least for the moment) came alive with posts on one side or the other, and I thought I had to respond to it all.
<...>
To Mr. Phil Robertson:
So much to go through here lets start with the race thing, since that seems to be the most recent dustup:
To say you never saw a Black person mistreated in the Deep South in the 50s and 60s, is genuinely astounding. Youre talking about people who couldnt vote, walk in the wrong part of town, drink from the wrong fountain, sit down in a diner, or show inadequate deference to any white trash idiot no matter how poor or stupid he was. Youre talking about people with few if any genuine rights who were consigned to those fields because they were actively excluded from anything else. You saw nothing but Black people being mistreated, and just because you never saw some white guy actually standing over them and beating them with a chain is no excuse to play dumb about it.
Ive never really watched your show, so I dont know much about your outlook beyond what youve unfortunately shared with the class in the GQ interview, but I come from the same place as you, Chief, so Im pretty sure I know your type and Im willing to bet I know which side of the Obama-Tea Party divide you fall on.
And given the Tea Party tendency to hysteria about tyranny, apocalyptic ranting about that armed revolt that well may be necessary to take our country back and just general bitch-whininess about every stitch of the Social Safety Net, or every minor act of the public sector to, you know, actually deal with our national problems . . . then for you to say that Blacks in the pre-Civil Rights South - people who were actually oppressed, actually persecuted, actually denied representation in the government that controlled their destiny and actually restricted in life by law, social convention and the ongoing threat of violence - if they occasionally sang or joked to lift their spirits, or didnt just break down sobbing in the goddam fields over their miserable lot in life, then they must have been happy as clams . . . makes you a fucking idiot.
And as for that mountainous spew of bile about gays . . .
The Bible uses the same word toevah (literally taboo) to describe eating shellfish and wearing mixed fibers. Im guessing youve never protested a Red Lobster, or complained that the cotton-poly blend in your hunting camo violated your faith. So Im going to guess your Bible defense for your homophobia is so much bullshit. Im going to guess you dont go around thinking I sure would love to embrace and welcome my gay brothers and sisters, but the Bible just wont let me.
- more -
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/12/20/1264135/-My-Facebook-Note-Re-Phil-Robertson
by Jaxpagan
Aside from actually catching occasional snippets, I've never watched Duck Dynasty, despite being from that state, and that part of the state, and that town (Monroe, La). Or maybe because of that - I grew up with people like them, and I saw this "flip-side" of the folksy humor a long time ago. Kinda done with it.
But after Phil Robertson spewed all over his GQ interview, my Facebook page (which carries an amazing diverse array of people, at least for the moment) came alive with posts on one side or the other, and I thought I had to respond to it all.
<...>
To Mr. Phil Robertson:
So much to go through here lets start with the race thing, since that seems to be the most recent dustup:
To say you never saw a Black person mistreated in the Deep South in the 50s and 60s, is genuinely astounding. Youre talking about people who couldnt vote, walk in the wrong part of town, drink from the wrong fountain, sit down in a diner, or show inadequate deference to any white trash idiot no matter how poor or stupid he was. Youre talking about people with few if any genuine rights who were consigned to those fields because they were actively excluded from anything else. You saw nothing but Black people being mistreated, and just because you never saw some white guy actually standing over them and beating them with a chain is no excuse to play dumb about it.
Ive never really watched your show, so I dont know much about your outlook beyond what youve unfortunately shared with the class in the GQ interview, but I come from the same place as you, Chief, so Im pretty sure I know your type and Im willing to bet I know which side of the Obama-Tea Party divide you fall on.
And given the Tea Party tendency to hysteria about tyranny, apocalyptic ranting about that armed revolt that well may be necessary to take our country back and just general bitch-whininess about every stitch of the Social Safety Net, or every minor act of the public sector to, you know, actually deal with our national problems . . . then for you to say that Blacks in the pre-Civil Rights South - people who were actually oppressed, actually persecuted, actually denied representation in the government that controlled their destiny and actually restricted in life by law, social convention and the ongoing threat of violence - if they occasionally sang or joked to lift their spirits, or didnt just break down sobbing in the goddam fields over their miserable lot in life, then they must have been happy as clams . . . makes you a fucking idiot.
And as for that mountainous spew of bile about gays . . .
The Bible uses the same word toevah (literally taboo) to describe eating shellfish and wearing mixed fibers. Im guessing youve never protested a Red Lobster, or complained that the cotton-poly blend in your hunting camo violated your faith. So Im going to guess your Bible defense for your homophobia is so much bullshit. Im going to guess you dont go around thinking I sure would love to embrace and welcome my gay brothers and sisters, but the Bible just wont let me.
- more -
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/12/20/1264135/-My-Facebook-Note-Re-Phil-Robertson
Beautiful smack down.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
25 replies, 3798 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (50)
ReplyReply to this post
25 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Robertson has been around during the mistreatment of blacks, they had their water fountains, could
Thinkingabout
Dec 2013
#3
Yes. The very fact that he lived where he saw "colored" and white faucets, toilets, and
DeschutesRiver
Dec 2013
#4
So praising "the good old days" isn't implying that blacks should be subservient to whites?
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#10
At best, what he said was astonishingly ignorant. Implying that African-Americans were happier
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#16