Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: California has just called for an Articale V Convention [View all]WillyT
(72,631 posts)42. More Info:
Last edited Tue Jun 24, 2014, 08:43 AM - Edit history (1)
Link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convention_to_propose_amendments_to_the_United_States_Constitution
And... did you know that the 17th Amendment (Direct Election of U.S. Senators) was 1 state away from an Article 5 Convention... until Congress jumped in ad did it themselves ???
Kind of lights a fire under the ass...
Reformers introduced constitutional amendments in 1828, 1829, and 1855, with the issues finally reaching a head during the 1890s and 1900s. Progressives, such as William Jennings Bryan, called for reform to the way senators were chosen. Elihu Root and George Frisbie Hoar were prominent figures in the campaign to maintain the state legislative selection of senators. By 1910, 31 state legislatures had passed motions calling for reform. By 1912, 239 political parties at both the state and national level had pledged some form of direct election, and 33 states had introduced the use of direct primaries. With a campaign for a state-led constitutional amendment gaining strength, and a fear that this could result in a "runaway convention", the proposal to mandate direct elections for the Senate was finally introduced in the Congress. It was passed by the Congress and, on May 13, 1912, was submitted to the states for ratification. By April 8, 1913, three-fourths of the states had ratified the proposed amendment, making it the Seventeenth Amendment. Secretary of State William Jennings Bryan formally declared the amendment's adoption on May 31, 1913.
Link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seventeenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
86 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
No, I don't like risking the constitutiion to the whims of reps chosen by state legislatures.
MohRokTah
Jun 2014
#9
Yes you are, and you have tightened the noose until it looks like he choked.
Fred Sanders
Jun 2014
#78
You do realize the convention only PROPOSES amendments, right? It doesn't ratify anything.
NYC Liberal
Jun 2014
#18
The OP says "Article V Convention" What part of "Convention" do you not understand"
yellowcanine
Jun 2014
#67
I've been wondering about that a bit: California's resolution makes reference
petronius
Jun 2014
#29
I agree with everything in your first paragraph and never said anything different.
radiclib
Jun 2014
#44
Every Republican in my state is totally corrupt, as are half the Democrats. This is a bad idea.
Scuba
Jun 2014
#72
True. Theoretically they could throw out the entire constitution and replace
totodeinhere
Jun 2014
#69
We are currently being bled dry both of our liberties and wealth. The status quo will only
rhett o rick
Jun 2014
#85
True. A lot of right wingers have been calling for an Article V convention but for
totodeinhere
Jun 2014
#70
A little history on how we went from the Articles of Confederation ...
Benton D Struckcheon
Jun 2014
#33
You are referring to the Constitutional Convention, which is different from Article V
radiclib
Jun 2014
#35
There has not been an Article V convention in the entire history of this nation.
MohRokTah
Jun 2014
#49
It very well might. At least some scholars believe that in an Article V Convention
totodeinhere
Jun 2014
#75
Paul Ryan pushed this in 2012 to repeal the 14th Amendment with its clauses of
freshwest
Jun 2014
#59