Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)

4. The reason it won't be an issue in 2016 is extremely obvious.

Reply to CK_John (Original post)

Mon Apr 13, 2015, 12:52 PM

Apr 2015

Other than that, I have missed the rash of posts on the topic that have sunk to the bottom of the du canal. Seems like it could be an environmental disaster. Go Nicaragua and China.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I'm puzzled, Why doesn't anyone on DU think the "Grand Canal of Nicaragua" [View all] CK_John Apr 2015 OP

It is not that it is not important, I think, but that it is going to happen no djean111 Apr 2015 #1

Why on earth would it be? Proud Public Servant Apr 2015 #2

It should be, but China won this issue elfin Apr 2015 #3

The reason it won't be an issue in 2016 is extremely obvious. NCTraveler Apr 2015 #4

Not obvious to me, This is more serious the Cuban missile crisis. CK_John Apr 2015 #5

Then I am missing something. NCTraveler Apr 2015 #6

The deal included an China controlled airport, electric grid, NSA type data center, CK_John Apr 2015 #7

Still missing the big deal. NCTraveler Apr 2015 #8

China is known to engage in human sacrifice, with dogs and cats living together. Orrex Apr 2015 #12

Chinese aircraft carriers off the coast of Louisianan may be the most creative speculation... LanternWaste Apr 2015 #10

Why the canal is designed to carry the supertankers and aircraft carriers too big. CK_John Apr 2015 #11

On account of shipping companies want moving those big tankers easier? lumberjack_jeff Apr 2015 #15

Thus far it doesn't seem like a realistic plan. hunter Apr 2015 #9

China constuction has made great strides since the "sixties" checkout the link o CK_John Apr 2015 #16

oh no! is there a canal gap? nt Javaman Apr 2015 #13

It's just another global catastrophe. Octafish Apr 2015 #14