Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

eridani

(51,907 posts)
Wed Jun 3, 2015, 04:29 AM Jun 2015

You Can Be Prosecuted for Clearing Your Browser History [View all]

http://www.thenation.com/article/208593/you-can-be-prosecuted-clearing-your-browser-history

In 2010 David Kernell, a University of Tennessee student, was convicted under Sarbanes-Oxley after he deleted digital records that showed he had obtained access to Sarah Palin’s Yahoo e-mail account. Using publicly available information, Kernell answered security questions that allowed him to reset Palin’s Yahoo password to “popcorn.” He downloaded information from Palin’s account, including photographs, and posted the new password online. He then deleted digital information that may have made it easier for federal investigators to find him. Like Matanov, he cleared the cache on his Internet browser. He also uninstalled Firefox, ran a disk defragmentation program to reorganize and clean up his hard drive, and deleted a series of images that he had downloaded from the account. For entering Palin’s e-mail, he was eventually convicted of misdemeanor unlawfully obtaining information from a protected computer and felony destruction of records under Sarbanes-Oxley. In January 2012, the US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit found that Kernell’s awareness of a potential investigation into his conduct was enough to uphold the felony charge.

At the time Kernell took steps to clean his computer, he does not appear to have known that there was any investigation into his conduct. Regardless, the government felt that they were entitled to that data, and the court agreed that Kernell was legally required to have preserved it.

Hanni Fakhoury, a senior staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, says the feds’ broad interpretation of Sarbanes-Oxley in the digital age is part of a wider trend: federal agents’ feeling “entitled” to digital data.

Fakhoury compares the broad application of Sarbanes-Oxley in the digital realm to the federal government’s resistance to cellphone companies that want to sell encrypted phones that would prevent law enforcement from being able to access users’ data. When the new encrypted iPhone came out, FBI Director James Comey told reporters that he didn’t understand why companies would “market something expressly to allow people to place themselves beyond the law.”

59 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This is nuts. xfundy Jun 2015 #1
unbelievable marym625 Jun 2015 #2
hacking is a crime? covering up by destroying evidence is a crime. gee who could figure that? nt msongs Jun 2015 #3
"destruction of records" joshcryer Jun 2015 #5
What kind of asinine crap is that? Years before you are ever accused of anything-- eridani Jun 2015 #7
If you have actual awareness that you intentionally committed a crime with your computer, then yes. prayin4rain Jun 2015 #8
And how many people have such knowledge years in advance? eridani Jun 2015 #11
Agreed. I think those people are safe. n/t prayin4rain Jun 2015 #47
Are you saying you think he didn't know that hacking someone's computer is illegal? WillowTree Jun 2015 #53
If the specific purpose was to cover up a crime hack89 Jun 2015 #9
Good luck distinguishing that from garden variety cyberhouskeeping n/t eridani Jun 2015 #12
He wasn't prosecuted for cyber-housekeeping; he was prosecuted for hacking and the deletion Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2015 #15
Sarbanes-Oxley had zero to do with individual file deletion. joshcryer Jun 2015 #24
Need I reply that "people are corporations too" or do I have that backwards LiberalArkie Jun 2015 #37
You nailed it. joshcryer Jun 2015 #39
Your post is an absolutely legitimate argument but the previously poster claiming it was Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2015 #45
It would be easy to determine if it was done on a routine basis hack89 Jun 2015 #40
Sarbanes-Oxley concerned corps. joshcryer Jun 2015 #23
I agree with you about Sarbanes-Oxley hack89 Jun 2015 #41
Then prosecute the destruction of the torture videos. Downwinder Jun 2015 #4
Stop being so sanctimonious. We must look forward, not KingCharlemagne Jun 2015 #31
Looking Forward: Downwinder Jun 2015 #48
DUZY...nt Jesus Malverde Jun 2015 #51
OFFS it was just some folks. L0oniX Jun 2015 #58
Sarbanes-Oxley was supposed to be for Enron style corruption. joshcryer Jun 2015 #6
But people who warned it would be overused weren't just making it up Recursion Jun 2015 #14
It's a joke. joshcryer Jun 2015 #16
Meh. Bribes are not routine for basic business in the US Recursion Jun 2015 #19
Can't disagree. joshcryer Jun 2015 #21
talk about making a stretch... ProdigalJunkMail Jun 2015 #10
"they could use any law to convict you of any thing" = Kafkaesque - nt KingCharlemagne Jun 2015 #33
Not sure how defragmentation meant anything IDemo Jun 2015 #13
When you delete files, they are just marked as deleted, they are still right there. djean111 Jun 2015 #17
Likely not securely without also employing a disk wipe utility, though IDemo Jun 2015 #18
Oh, you are right, but it would sure be on my list of things to do if I was trying to wipe a disk. djean111 Jun 2015 #20
Which is why the Linux dd command is nicknamed 'disk destroyer' IDemo Jun 2015 #22
Linux dd command malokvale77 Jun 2015 #59
You can defrag with null or random data. joshcryer Jun 2015 #25
That's cool. djean111 Jun 2015 #26
Under this broad interpretation? joshcryer Jun 2015 #27
Oh, I know it is. djean111 Jun 2015 #29
Truth. joshcryer Jun 2015 #35
I clean out my browser history as a matter of routine once a week. hobbit709 Jun 2015 #28
This under ann--- Jun 2015 #30
What about deleting e-mails? bigwillq Jun 2015 #32
Clearing browser history should be done daily and automatically, like with Firefox. bemildred Jun 2015 #34
The privileged lie Gman Jun 2015 #36
he gets a federal felony for resetting a password on a yahoo account. Hacker news usa gets NOTHING Sunlei Jun 2015 #38
I've got no sympathy for him. cwydro Jun 2015 #42
just like in any crime when you destroy evidence Romeo.lima333 Jun 2015 #43
LOL, hiding the murder weapon and bloody clothes before you knew the FSogol Jun 2015 #44
Actually the crime is murder Jesus Malverde Jun 2015 #50
I have private browsing as default PowerToThePeople Jun 2015 #46
my browser's set to delete when closed! n/t wildbilln864 Jun 2015 #49
So upgrading my operating system would be a similar violation. liberal N proud Jun 2015 #52
Required to preserve data that may incriminate you? Sounds like the 5th should apply here. Plus Monk06 Jun 2015 #54
The Police in this country are out of control, on so many fronts.nt Joe the Revelator Jun 2015 #55
Coincidentally I was personally involved with Yahoo's efforts to catch this guy... cascadiance Jun 2015 #56
Gee ...my browsers are set to delete history on quit. L0oniX Jun 2015 #57
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»You Can Be Prosecuted for...