Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cascadiance

(19,537 posts)
56. Coincidentally I was personally involved with Yahoo's efforts to catch this guy...
Wed Jun 3, 2015, 09:23 PM
Jun 2015

I know they caught him by looking at raw server mail log files and spotting his IP address.

I think a good question to ask was the timing of when he deleted his browser history. He knew that he had broken in to her account, and that this was unlawful. And Yahoo was aware of what was going on the day he did it, and probably located his IP address that day or not long after that. So, I think he probably knew that investigation was coming his way shortly after the hack.

If Yahoo and the FBI had already gone through prosecuting him and doing everything and he did this months later, then perhaps he could argue that he didn't think his actions then would get in the way of an investigation then, if he had perceived it had already been concluded then. I have to believe though that they probably went through his computer after he purged these records shortly after the hack, which is why they went after him.

I'm guessing they probably wanted to make sure that he hadn't hacked others' accounts too.

This is nuts. xfundy Jun 2015 #1
unbelievable marym625 Jun 2015 #2
hacking is a crime? covering up by destroying evidence is a crime. gee who could figure that? nt msongs Jun 2015 #3
"destruction of records" joshcryer Jun 2015 #5
What kind of asinine crap is that? Years before you are ever accused of anything-- eridani Jun 2015 #7
If you have actual awareness that you intentionally committed a crime with your computer, then yes. prayin4rain Jun 2015 #8
And how many people have such knowledge years in advance? eridani Jun 2015 #11
Agreed. I think those people are safe. n/t prayin4rain Jun 2015 #47
Are you saying you think he didn't know that hacking someone's computer is illegal? WillowTree Jun 2015 #53
If the specific purpose was to cover up a crime hack89 Jun 2015 #9
Good luck distinguishing that from garden variety cyberhouskeeping n/t eridani Jun 2015 #12
He wasn't prosecuted for cyber-housekeeping; he was prosecuted for hacking and the deletion Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2015 #15
Sarbanes-Oxley had zero to do with individual file deletion. joshcryer Jun 2015 #24
Need I reply that "people are corporations too" or do I have that backwards LiberalArkie Jun 2015 #37
You nailed it. joshcryer Jun 2015 #39
Your post is an absolutely legitimate argument but the previously poster claiming it was Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2015 #45
It would be easy to determine if it was done on a routine basis hack89 Jun 2015 #40
Sarbanes-Oxley concerned corps. joshcryer Jun 2015 #23
I agree with you about Sarbanes-Oxley hack89 Jun 2015 #41
Then prosecute the destruction of the torture videos. Downwinder Jun 2015 #4
Stop being so sanctimonious. We must look forward, not KingCharlemagne Jun 2015 #31
Looking Forward: Downwinder Jun 2015 #48
DUZY...nt Jesus Malverde Jun 2015 #51
OFFS it was just some folks. L0oniX Jun 2015 #58
Sarbanes-Oxley was supposed to be for Enron style corruption. joshcryer Jun 2015 #6
But people who warned it would be overused weren't just making it up Recursion Jun 2015 #14
It's a joke. joshcryer Jun 2015 #16
Meh. Bribes are not routine for basic business in the US Recursion Jun 2015 #19
Can't disagree. joshcryer Jun 2015 #21
talk about making a stretch... ProdigalJunkMail Jun 2015 #10
"they could use any law to convict you of any thing" = Kafkaesque - nt KingCharlemagne Jun 2015 #33
Not sure how defragmentation meant anything IDemo Jun 2015 #13
When you delete files, they are just marked as deleted, they are still right there. djean111 Jun 2015 #17
Likely not securely without also employing a disk wipe utility, though IDemo Jun 2015 #18
Oh, you are right, but it would sure be on my list of things to do if I was trying to wipe a disk. djean111 Jun 2015 #20
Which is why the Linux dd command is nicknamed 'disk destroyer' IDemo Jun 2015 #22
Linux dd command malokvale77 Jun 2015 #59
You can defrag with null or random data. joshcryer Jun 2015 #25
That's cool. djean111 Jun 2015 #26
Under this broad interpretation? joshcryer Jun 2015 #27
Oh, I know it is. djean111 Jun 2015 #29
Truth. joshcryer Jun 2015 #35
I clean out my browser history as a matter of routine once a week. hobbit709 Jun 2015 #28
This under ann--- Jun 2015 #30
What about deleting e-mails? bigwillq Jun 2015 #32
Clearing browser history should be done daily and automatically, like with Firefox. bemildred Jun 2015 #34
The privileged lie Gman Jun 2015 #36
he gets a federal felony for resetting a password on a yahoo account. Hacker news usa gets NOTHING Sunlei Jun 2015 #38
I've got no sympathy for him. cwydro Jun 2015 #42
just like in any crime when you destroy evidence Romeo.lima333 Jun 2015 #43
LOL, hiding the murder weapon and bloody clothes before you knew the FSogol Jun 2015 #44
Actually the crime is murder Jesus Malverde Jun 2015 #50
I have private browsing as default PowerToThePeople Jun 2015 #46
my browser's set to delete when closed! n/t wildbilln864 Jun 2015 #49
So upgrading my operating system would be a similar violation. liberal N proud Jun 2015 #52
Required to preserve data that may incriminate you? Sounds like the 5th should apply here. Plus Monk06 Jun 2015 #54
The Police in this country are out of control, on so many fronts.nt Joe the Revelator Jun 2015 #55
Coincidentally I was personally involved with Yahoo's efforts to catch this guy... cascadiance Jun 2015 #56
Gee ...my browsers are set to delete history on quit. L0oniX Jun 2015 #57
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»You Can Be Prosecuted for...»Reply #56