Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

appalachiablue

(41,310 posts)
20. Just saying, is correct. Horsebull.
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 08:55 PM
Jun 2016

"The MIDDLE CLASS is Shrinking Just about Everywhere in America", New Pew Research Data, Wash. Post, May 11, 2016.

The great shrinking of the middle class that has captured the attention of the nation is not only playing out in troubled regions like the Rust Belt, Appalachia and the Deep South, but in just about every metropolitan area in America, according to a major new analysis by the Pew Research Center. Pew reported in December that a clear majority of American adults no longer live in the middle class, a demographic reality shaped by decades of widening inequality, declining industry and the erosion of financial stability and family-wage jobs.
>But while much of the attention has focused on communities hardest hit by economic declines, the new Pew data, based on metro-level income data since 2000, show that middle-class stagnation is a far broader phenomenon.

The share of adults living in middle-income households has also dwindled in Washington, New York, San Francisco, Atlanta and Denver. It's fallen in smaller Midwestern metros where the middle class has long made up an overwhelming majority of the population. It's withering in coastal tech hubs, in military towns, in college communities, in Sun Belt cities.
The decline of the American middle class is "a pervasive local phenomenon," according to Pew, which analyzed census and American Community Survey data in 229 metros across the country, encompassing about three-quarters of the U.S. population. In 203 of those metros, the share of adults in middle-income households fell from 2000 to 2014.


Pew defines middle-income households here as those making between two-thirds and twice the national median household income. For a three-person household in 2014, that means an income between about $42,000 and $125,000. The fact that median incomes have declined over this same time frame also means that the bar to get into the middle class is actually lower now than it was in 2000. Pew's metro-level data are also adjusted for household size and local cost of living.
The shrinking middle class is in part a reflection of rising income inequality in America, and of the same underlying and uneven economic forces that have fueled the rise of Donald Trump. And as the middle class has been shrinking, median incomes have fallen, too. In 190 of these 229 metros, the median income dropped over this same time.
As the middle class has shrunk, Pew points out, the lower and upper classes in America have grown in size and significance. In some metros, the middle class is dwindling primarily because families are falling out of it and into the lower class. The share of households in this bottom tier has skyrocketed since 2000, for instance, in Goldbsoro, North Carolina, a railroad junction with an Air Force base.

..In only about a quarter of all of these metros does the middle class make up less than a majority of the adult population today. But the largest metros in the country fall into this group, including New York, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Boston and Washington. In each of these metros, the middle class is relatively small because the upper-class share of the population is larger than average. These same metros also tend to have wider income inequality, reflecting the broad spectrum of jobs in industries from the low-paying service sector to finance and biotech. As a result, not surprisingly, Pew's data shows that metros with greater income inequality tend to have smaller middle classes. When the income distribution is narrower, on the other hand, more people are likely to be clustered in that middle tier between $42,000 and $125,000. Continued.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/05/11/the-middle-class-is-shrinking-just-about-everywhere-in-america/ *Includes Video.

At least the bison are making a small comeback Warpy Jun 2016 #1
Yeah that and the Taste of Wild Buffalo/Venison dog food. jwirr Jun 2016 #50
The numbers of middle class have steadily increased bhikkhu Jun 2016 #2
50% is greater than 60%? Who knew. truebluegreen Jun 2016 #3
Some people really don't understand statistics, do they? passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #6
It's not just the labels. The 50% who are "middle class" are more squeezed than before Bucky Jun 2016 #35
Bingo, bang on right. n/t geardaddy Jun 2016 #41
I don't see how they think food is costing less arikara Jun 2016 #43
According to the living wage calculator passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #58
Thanks for the link.... llmart Jun 2016 #72
the second chart is annual passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #75
Yes, I see that now..... llmart Jun 2016 #97
welp, according to that we're on the bottom end of the middle class. Phlem Jun 2016 #74
I can't believe that some people are STILL sellling that "recovery" bullshit. bvar22 Jun 2016 #59
thank you passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #60
+10 appalachiablue Jun 2016 #63
LOL.. disillusioned73 Jun 2016 #37
It may be more people, but a smaller percentage MiniMe Jun 2016 #4
Actually, no bhikkhu Jun 2016 #10
"the largest losses in the middle class since 1970 are due to people becoming wealthy" Phlem Jun 2016 #48
It does sound unlikely, but that's what the numbers indicate. bhikkhu Jun 2016 #65
Still trying to sell that garbage huh. Phlem Jun 2016 #67
If you have any other numbers to go on, I'll look at them bhikkhu Jun 2016 #71
And we have no link to look at to dispute your numbers passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #79
Here are the links bhikkhu Jun 2016 #85
So, I saw your links earlier in the thread passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #87
Exactly right bhikkhu Jun 2016 #90
What the hell are you even trying to do here except troll people? passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #91
I started with the simple statement that the number of people in the middle class has been growing bhikkhu Jun 2016 #93
But what you are not getting here is arikara Jun 2016 #95
Yeah, no. Maedhros Jun 2016 #62
So the 46 million on food stamps in America today came from where, exactly? NickB79 Jun 2016 #64
There are 92 million people in the US in the lower income class bhikkhu Jun 2016 #66
Poverty levels are rising in this country, not shrinking. passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #81
There is no doubt that the number of people in lower income households has been rising bhikkhu Jun 2016 #92
LINK PLEASE passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #78
Here are links bhikkhu Jun 2016 #88
Too little too late. Look at my last post. And your links just prove my point. passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #89
It's the percentage, st***d! angstlessk Jun 2016 #8
Numbers increased bhikkhu Jun 2016 #9
So according to you, if 95% of 2,000 purple eyed people die at age 2 years old angstlessk Jun 2016 #13
I would say its good that we have added 30 million or so to the middle class since 1970 bhikkhu Jun 2016 #16
Yes, the wealthy class is growing... passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #80
I have my doubts that many of those that went on OASDI Downwinder Jun 2016 #24
7% up and 4% down actually... whatthehey Jun 2016 #98
That's really kind of sad ornotna Jun 2016 #11
Just a commentary on accuracy. bhikkhu Jun 2016 #12
It's a cartoon ornotna Jun 2016 #14
demographic changes...vietnam is now a labor competitor? THAT demographic change? angstlessk Jun 2016 #15
This message was self-deleted by its author Phlem Jun 2016 #49
And links to actual data are even more whorthwhile. passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #82
And it is a lot worse than you present it. zeemike Jun 2016 #19
Just saying, is correct. Horsebull. appalachiablue Jun 2016 #20
Shrinking as a percentage, growing in numbers as population increases bhikkhu Jun 2016 #22
Show us your accuracy, post the data. appalachiablue Jun 2016 #23
Data is easy bhikkhu Jun 2016 #25
Hillary should put this graph in every economic ad Angel Martin Jun 2016 #28
Yet almost everyone misses that 75% more people moved into the upper class than fell into the lower whatthehey Jun 2016 #47
bhikkhu logic Angel Martin Jun 2016 #26
It's astonishing, pure magic! .... appalachiablue Jun 2016 #27
Again, of course all segments of society will grow as the population grows. passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #84
This should be it's own op.. disillusioned73 Jun 2016 #38
For sure. Already posted in Good Reads but for whatever reason not much traffic. appalachiablue Jun 2016 #39
+1 geardaddy Jun 2016 #42
Middle Class Due to Dual Incomes? TexasMommaWithAHat Jun 2016 #21
Once Middle Class, Millions Are Joining the Ranks of 'Disposable' Americans jtuck004 Jun 2016 #29
Rec- good post thanks. appalachiablue Jun 2016 #40
I don't know where you are getting your data but it's bogus. rhett o rick Jun 2016 #32
Its raw numbers versus percentages bhikkhu Jun 2016 #33
Ah it makes perfect sense now. So if 50% of Americans, about 160 million, are middle class A Simple Game Jun 2016 #36
This is an idiotic post Android3.14 Jun 2016 #34
We are being trolled passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #86
Yup. Android3.14 Jun 2016 #96
Don't know where your numbers are from . . FairWinds Jun 2016 #46
The easiest graphic to find is from the Pew Research Center bhikkhu Jun 2016 #70
this says the middle class is shrinking but you've been stating the middle class is growing passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #83
Glad to see you understand the middle class shrunk due to the wealthy stealing from the working Rex Jun 2016 #56
Jesus h Christ. Are you OK? Doctor_J Jun 2016 #61
Honestly, perhaps I should have kept my mouth shut bhikkhu Jun 2016 #73
Again, without a link your point is mute. passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #77
Well played bhikkhu Jun 2016 #94
You know what? passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #76
While you're talking statistics, let me throw out my own criticism Yupster Jun 2016 #99
That is true bhikkhu Jun 2016 #100
K&R passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #5
Thanks for posting Omaha Steve Jun 2016 #7
Both killed off by greed elmac Jun 2016 #17
Truly a vanishing breed. lpbk2713 Jun 2016 #18
Another label: people who read and think. LuckyLib Jun 2016 #30
And they will be even more reduced RoccoR5955 Jun 2016 #31
Point taken but overgeneralized DissidentVoice Jun 2016 #44
Also "Dittoheads". Spitfire of ATJ Jun 2016 #45
And no pol even mentions the poor anymore. merrily Jun 2016 #51
Alas, I ponder ways to pass on our house to our son. HuckleB Jun 2016 #52
It's working the other way too, people at the end of their lives are having to move in with kids.. Fumesucker Jun 2016 #54
Indeed. I have more than a few friends in that situation. HuckleB Jun 2016 #55
Great cartoon Gothmog Jun 2016 #53
Damn! I almost got it! Norman Conch Quest Jun 2016 #57
perhaps, in five months, this will be more appropo: Gabi Hayes Jun 2016 #68
while we're on the subject Gabi Hayes Jun 2016 #69
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»They once inhabited a vas...»Reply #20