General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Neil DeGrasse Tyson Tells Bill Maher That Anti-Science Liberals Are Full of Shit Too [View all]HuckleB
(35,773 posts)If you don't know that some of the best science information on the planet is by actual scientists at their blogs, then you have no business pretending to know what's happening in the world of science.
BTW, we both know that's lame, because your whole first post was nothing but anti-GMO propaganda, straight from ugly anti-GMO web pages. Don't try to play such games. That's not ok.
And you chose to ignore all the science with findings that were different from Benbrook.
In other words, you are not basing anything in science. You are running from it.
You do know that the journal Benbrook's stuff was published in has a very low impact factor, right? And you know it's the same journal that republished Seralini? Yeah, there is no credibility there. You understand that, right?
But if you still think Benbrook is the be all, end all, come on over to Food and Farm Discussion Lab on Facebook, where you can discuss it with scientists, farmers, and science lovers. I think you would be interested to see what they have to say.