Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Post removed [View all]Logical
(22,457 posts)17. I agree, not sure why they decided to do that. nt
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
62 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
There should be full transparency. Notification to the poster and the thread itself. Expose abuse.
TheBlackAdder
Jun 2016
#58
Juries evaluate possible violations of Community Standards. TOS violations are handled by the
rhett o rick
Jun 2016
#14
I wasn't picking at your terminology. I find that a number of people here believe
rhett o rick
Jun 2016
#19
I like knowing the results of the jury, because it provides a good barometer as to whether my
Brickbat
Jun 2016
#18
The whole idea of half a dozen choices is a bit disconcerting. You either want it hidden or
madinmaryland
Jun 2016
#27
...and what is good, and what is not good, need we define these, Phaedrus?
Buns_of_Fire
Jun 2016
#50
I have a trick I use that allows me to check the results of my jury service anyway.
tblue37
Jun 2016
#51
I prefer to know the results too... but actually, your OP here should be alerted on.
thesquanderer
Jun 2016
#55