General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Democrats step up calls that Russian hack was act of war [View all]BainsBane
(53,141 posts)Of our democratic rights is that a Secretary of State had the audacity to comment on corrupt elections.
You have argued that speech itself is illicit. Does it make you feel good to see the rise in hate crimes, to see families broken apart by immigration raids while you sit back and insist it's just deserts? What have they done to deserve the denial of rights, the terror, and oppression you insist is deserved because the Secretary of State dared to speak truthfully about fraudulent elections staged by a right wing dictator?
If what goes around comes around, when will it be your turn? Or are you content knowing that your privilege protects you from the impact of the Kremlin interference on the lives of the most vulnerable?
Your position is not based on history. You cite no historical evidence. The only function of equating speech with hacking, collusion and espionage is to justify the fascist takeover of America.