Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: (Raw Story/Newsweek) Bernie Sanders endorsement labeled colossal mistake [View all]Trial_By_Fire
(624 posts)38. Here is an idea... go look at the Democratic Platform...
What else do you need to read...
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
161 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
(Raw Story/Newsweek) Bernie Sanders endorsement labeled colossal mistake [View all]
still_one
May 2017
OP
Wise words that apply to the entire nation and national political races.
democratisphere
May 2017
#1
He also said, Trump may not have colluded with he Russians and Dems need lay off the Russia thing.
fun n serious
May 2017
#2
Oh really? Do you have a link to where he said to lay off the Russia thing?
beam me up scottie
May 2017
#3
It's ridiculous to suppose there was no collusion. He ASKED them for hacks, he GAVE them
bettyellen
May 2017
#44
Senators are absolutely speculating about collusion and I agree! Waters, Cummings, Schumer have all
bettyellen
May 2017
#51
So that's a no, senators are not claiming there was definitely collusion.
beam me up scottie
May 2017
#55
I wasn't aware that Breitbart was suggesting there was collision and demanding an investigation.
beam me up scottie
May 2017
#60
Wait, what? Demanding an investigation is speculating that it's nothing?
beam me up scottie
May 2017
#67
So he didn't suggest that it's a nothing burger? We agree - that's what I thought too!
beam me up scottie
May 2017
#70
He did speculate that the investigation would turn up nothing AND Dems would try and
bettyellen
May 2017
#71
Bernie simply said it could turn up nothing and he's right. He didn't suggest there was no collusio.
beam me up scottie
May 2017
#74
It is all about 2017-2018 to me- and supporting Dems for congress and governors...
bettyellen
May 2017
#128
It's 2017 and some are parroting the RW nonsense that maybe there's nothing to
bettyellen
May 2017
#130
You're right, Republicans believed every horrible rumour about Hillary for decades.
beam me up scottie
May 2017
#138
Sanders implied the Dems would politicize the Russian investigation - he floated the possibility
bettyellen
May 2017
#139
+1000, and on top of that, he outright said that people don't have faith in Democrats
R B Garr
May 2017
#141
Yeah, I think this passive aggressive distancing himself is embarrassing only to himself-
bettyellen
May 2017
#142
He also said, Trump may not have colluded with he Russians and Dems need lay off the Russia thing.
LenaBaby61
May 2017
#72
Do you have a link to where he said to lay off Russia? The other poster didn't provide one.
beam me up scottie
May 2017
#77
Do you have a link to where he said to lay off Russia? The other poster didn't provide one.
LenaBaby61
May 2017
#78
A larger point is brought up in an earlier article from the Omaha World Hearld
still_one
May 2017
#10
Republicans do everything possible to place their people in state and local offices...
Trial_By_Fire
May 2017
#12
I didn't present the notion, you did. It's not a game, just as it isn't a game....
George II
May 2017
#41
Would be interesting if they could quantify how many were/are actually bots-
bettyellen
May 2017
#144
Those attacking Sanders made abortion the #1 issue in a conservative leaning race
kristopher
May 2017
#124
Ignoring the fact that the Washington Examiner is a right wing paper, the Omaha World Hearld asked a
still_one
May 2017
#14
I had no idea. I suppose NARAL and other prochoice groups DIDN"T come out against him
m-lekktor
May 2017
#23
I don't think that is what the poster is saying, in fact just the opposite. That NARAL, Perez, and
still_one
May 2017
#31
What does abortion have to do with a mayoral race? It has nothing to do with it, nor can a mayor
still_one
May 2017
#29
So back to reality. Reality is that the 1% global oligarchs used him because....
R B Garr
May 2017
#82
I think you are right on Federal and State races without a doubt. A race for Mayor though is a
still_one
May 2017
#21
Yet people were bitching that Bernie wasn't helping Ossoff enough in moderate Georgia.
PatsFan87
May 2017
#17
I think dealing with Federal and State candidates is much different than dealing with a Mayoral race
still_one
May 2017
#22
I know you were, and the argument you presented that "why only blame Bernie", when Perez, NARAL and
still_one
May 2017
#34
No, it was that he declined to say if Osoff was "progressive enough" - passive aggressive bullshit
bettyellen
May 2017
#54
Elections results cannot be explained logically unless the voting process is transparent
diva77
May 2017
#24
Yes, but one reason they're critical is that there's less consensus than you suggest
Jim Lane
May 2017
#91