Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: 'It was just chaos': Broken machines, incomplete voter rolls leave some wondering whether their ball [View all]pnwmom
(109,032 posts)and it makes no sense. It lowers their credibility on real election fraud.
For example, Hillary had no motivation to suppress voting in Arizona -- the poll closures were in the most Latino county, which supported Hillary heavily. And it turned out that the Republican elections person was behind that.
Same thing in Brooklyn. A Republican had ordered the vote purge six months ago and it affected Hillary just as much as Bernie -- maybe more, since all 5 NYC boroughs had heavy Hillary support. (Upstate was where Bernie drew most of his voters.)
And now, same thing in L.A. LA is a strong county for Hillary, based on polling and demographics. She wouldn't be behind any voter suppression there.
And yet Bernie supporters seem determined to blame her for any problem that occurs anywhere. The all-powerful Hillary.
P.S. People here were posting about those electronic machines during the NY primary, alleging rampant fraud there. They didn't know that NY switched to all paper ballots years ago, with optical scanners. They didn't even bother to check the facts before accusing Hillary of somehow altering the results with those machines.
After seeing so many overwrought and under-thought out claims about Hillary related to election fraud, I'm starting to get skeptical about the whole subject.