Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

crosinski

(414 posts)
28. It depends on who decides.
Mon Jul 11, 2016, 04:37 PM
Jul 2016

Oh good, I'm glad you came back because I do respect the thought you've put into this, and I DO see your point of view. I think you're coming at this from a different perspective than me, though, because you seem to have experience with security and I don't.

I do have experience with people who 'run the show' though, and Clinton's aides were 'those' people. They were the people who decided what was classified and what was not. They were the direct link to Hillary too, so it's awfully hard to say that they must be held accountable for a classification blunder if they were the people in charge of determining what was classified and what was not. See what I mean?

So, I think that's what the State Department has to do now. They have to decide if there will be any consequence for not removing those classified markings from two emails. I think not removing those markings would be within the range of a normal human failure rate. Maybe you think differently, and if you do, I respect your opinion, but humbly disagree.

It's all good, my dear seabeckind.

They are goners, IMO... Helen Borg Jul 2016 #1
yes, the mighty all powerful Chuck Grassley (R-Liar)! will make it so emulatorloo Jul 2016 #9
This is just typical "The Hill" anti-Clinton muckraking. Unless I missed it, there are no... George II Jul 2016 #2
Chuck Grassley, for one. Wilms Jul 2016 #3
Well, that settles it then. The Iowa idiot's word is MIGHTY... Surya Gayatri Jul 2016 #6
^^^AMEN to this!^^^ Surya Gayatri Jul 2016 #7
The hill should change it's name to the h.a.g. Ohioblue22 Jul 2016 #4
State has picked up its investigation into the matter following morningfog Jul 2016 #5
The security clearance issue is a real problem. seabeckind Jul 2016 #8
FBI director says Clinton did not lie, break law in email handling. emulatorloo Jul 2016 #11
Not a matter of legality. seabeckind Jul 2016 #13
I did not smear you, unclear why you felt the need to smear me emulatorloo Jul 2016 #14
That wasn't a smear. seabeckind Jul 2016 #15
Thinly veiled implication was that I am ignorant and unprincipled emulatorloo Jul 2016 #16
No it wasn't fbc Jul 2016 #17
Nothing they posted read like it was a smear directed at you in any form. cstanleytech Jul 2016 #18
No GummyBearz Jul 2016 #19
Thanks. There was no smear intended. seabeckind Jul 2016 #23
Not A Scab crosinski Jul 2016 #20
Whether the marking was in error or not doesn't enter into it. seabeckind Jul 2016 #21
Specific Allegations crosinski Jul 2016 #24
I have no intention of discussing specifics seabeckind Jul 2016 #25
Ok, but maybe we have misunderstood each other. crosinski Jul 2016 #26
I took off the reference. seabeckind Jul 2016 #27
It depends on who decides. crosinski Jul 2016 #28
Had to go get my blood sludge tested. seabeckind Jul 2016 #29
Pressure does not grow, it increases. This isn't pressure, it is republican politics as usual. L. Coyote Jul 2016 #10
Yep. Lying lies and the liars who tell them emulatorloo Jul 2016 #12
Ignore Republican drama & distractions Sunlei Jul 2016 #22
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Pressure grows on Clinton...»Reply #28