Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
In reply to the discussion: Stewart Brand: Why Environmentalists Must Accept Nuclear [View all]wtmusic
(39,166 posts)37. It sucks to be you?
Sorry, but you'll have to speak for yourself.
GG, when you claim that the "goal of this system...is to turn as much fuel into waste products" you've jumped the shark. Waste is (by definition) not a goal.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Sorry - it's actually low energy "transformity" that's the hallmark of low quality.
GliderGuider
Feb 2013
#46