Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Showing Original Post only (View all)Either China's screwed, or everybody is. [View all]
China is currently burning half the world's coal, which supplies 68% of their primary energy consumption. If China were to keep increasing their coal consumption at the same rate as the past decade for the next 18 years, in 2030 they would be burning all the coal produced in the world today. China cannot keep up their current expansion of energy use based on coal because a) there isn't enough production and shipping capacity in the world to support it; b) the CO2 emissions would be insupportable.
They don't have enough other energy resources (gas, renewables or hydro) to replace coal use over the next two decades.
The implication is that the Chinese coal consumption is probably going to peak quite soon, perhaps within the next 5-10 years. The effect that will have on the Chinese economy could easily be catastrophic, and the knock-on effects for the world economy will be only somewhat less serious.
If the Chinese economy does crash, we could be within a decade of seeing global CO2 emissions stop rising, but at the cost of a significant slowdown or decline in the world economy - even when taking energy efficiency improvements into account.
Either that or China keeps increasing their coal use, their economy continues to boom, but the world loses its last vestige of hope for avoiding a climate calamity.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
32 replies, 2926 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
32 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Well, no matter what one is "selling," be it a vision of disaster or something else, curve...
NNadir
Nov 2013
#27
It's EIA, though output will vary a bit - grade of coal, efficiency of combustion, etc.
hatrack
Nov 2013
#24
"1 short ton (2,000 pounds) of this coal will generate about 5,720 pounds (2.86 short tons)"
kristopher
Nov 2013
#26