Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
26. "1 short ton (2,000 pounds) of this coal will generate about 5,720 pounds (2.86 short tons)"
Tue Nov 19, 2013, 05:21 PM
Nov 2013

The amount of heat emitted during coal combustion depends largely on the amounts of carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen present in the coal and, to a lesser extent, on the sulfur content. Hence, the ratio of carbon to heat content depends on these heat-producing components of coal, and these components vary by coal rank.

Carbon, by far the major component of coal, is the principal source of heat, generating about 14,500 British thermal units (Btu) per pound. The typical carbon content for coal (dry basis) ranges from more than 60 percent for lignite to more than 80 percent for anthracite. Although hydrogen generates about 62,000 Btu per pound, it accounts for only 5 percent or less of coal and not all of this is available for heat because part of the hydrogen combines with oxygen to form water vapor. The higher the oxygen content of coal, the lower its heating value.(3) This inverse relationship occurs because oxygen in the coal is bound to the carbon and has, therefore, already partially oxidized the carbon, decreasing its ability to generate heat. The amount of heat contributed by the combustion of sulfur in coal is relatively small, because the heating value of sulfur is only about 4,000 Btu per pound, and the sulfur content of coal generally averages 1 to 2 percent by weight.(4) Consequently, variations in the ratios of carbon to heat content of coal are due primarily to variations in the hydrogen content.

The carbon dioxide emission factors in this article are expressed in terms of the energy content of coal as pounds of carbon dioxide per million Btu. Carbon dioxide (CO2) forms during coal combustion when one atom of carbon (C) unites with two atoms of oxygen (O) from the air. Because the atomic weight of carbon is 12 and that of oxygen is 16, the atomic weight of carbon dioxide is 44. Based on that ratio, and assuming complete combustion, 1 pound of carbon combines with 2.667 pounds of oxygen to produce 3.667 pounds of carbon dioxide. For example, coal with a carbon content of 78 percent and a heating value of 14,000 Btu per pound emits about 204.3 pounds of carbon dioxide per million Btu when completely burned.(5) Complete combustion of 1 short ton (2,000 pounds) of this coal will generate about 5,720 pounds (2.86 short tons) of carbon dioxide.

http://www.eia.gov/coal/production/quarterly/co2_article/co2.html

Unsustainable energy-base is just one of many destabilizing factors in China. DetlefK Nov 2013 #1
China can't reprise the European industrial revolution. GliderGuider Nov 2013 #6
"They don't have enough other energy resources..." kristopher Nov 2013 #2
Economies require energy. GliderGuider Nov 2013 #4
You said they don't have the resources. kristopher Nov 2013 #7
I know Canada is doing badly. I'm not talking about Canada. GliderGuider Nov 2013 #9
Maybe you SHOULD be talking about Canada. kristopher Nov 2013 #11
Why, so I'll stop talking about really uncomfortable things? GliderGuider Nov 2013 #12
I was thinking you might be motivated ... kristopher Nov 2013 #13
I yam what I yam, kristopher. GliderGuider Nov 2013 #16
China has a lot of solar potential Demeter Nov 2013 #3
What's the source for your extrapolation? FBaggins Nov 2013 #5
The data is from the BP Statistical Review. GliderGuider Nov 2013 #10
Sorry... once again? FBaggins Nov 2013 #14
Those are my curve fits to the BP data. nt GliderGuider Nov 2013 #15
Surely you know that you can't do that? FBaggins Nov 2013 #17
So both the pro- and anti-nuke camps think this is bad juju. GliderGuider Nov 2013 #18
Which should tell you something FBaggins Nov 2013 #19
Actually, GliderGuider Nov 2013 #20
Nope. FBaggins Nov 2013 #21
Here's how I see it. GliderGuider Nov 2013 #23
Well, no matter what one is "selling," be it a vision of disaster or something else, curve... NNadir Nov 2013 #27
I've banished two words from my vocabulary: "should" and "hope" GliderGuider Nov 2013 #29
Whilst not as pessimistic as you, I thought that was a good post - thanks. Nihil Nov 2013 #31
Glad you liked it! GliderGuider Nov 2013 #32
100 million tons of coal for China pscot Nov 2013 #8
100 million tons of coal will produce 286 million tons of CO2 byproduct ??? CRH Nov 2013 #22
It's EIA, though output will vary a bit - grade of coal, efficiency of combustion, etc. hatrack Nov 2013 #24
He's not that wrong. GliderGuider Nov 2013 #25
"1 short ton (2,000 pounds) of this coal will generate about 5,720 pounds (2.86 short tons)" kristopher Nov 2013 #26
Basic chemistry FBaggins Nov 2013 #28
Something else to note: GliderGuider Nov 2013 #30
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Either China's screwed, o...»Reply #26