Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Faith Based Medicine is Snake Oil [View all]Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)47. the "literalists" have a hermeneutic analytic framework
Last edited Wed Mar 18, 2015, 09:09 AM - Edit history (1)
that is widely misunderstood to be the claim that the bible is word for word the infallible exact utterances of god. There are likely many evangelical and fundamentalist believers who think that is what their sect preaches as well, but if you go look at what their theologians actually say, it isn't. They think they are finding the hidden meanings within the text, that the texts contain the divine words, just not in plain text.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
64 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I threw that in there as an aside. There is no way the OP was recommending it, especially for a
still_one
Mar 2015
#22
Perhaps it may trigger an immune response, however, the OP's point is pretty clear, that kids die
still_one
Mar 2015
#16
of course not. I should not have brought it into this thread, because it could be interpreted the
still_one
Mar 2015
#25
Of course not, but there are rare case where remissions have occurred when conventional treatments
still_one
Mar 2015
#27
Is religion at odds with science, or people's interpretation of religion. A person can have faith,
still_one
Mar 2015
#29
There are religious people who do not take the bible literally, and those that do, and I guess that
still_one
Mar 2015
#36
It wasn't out of left field. It was solidly grounded in the ongoing dialog here.
Warren Stupidity
Mar 2015
#52
it was not a non-sequitur, it was not a personal attack, it was directly relevant.
Warren Stupidity
Mar 2015
#56