Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

skepticscott

(13,029 posts)
61. Did they endure ANYTHING like what they inflicted on others?
Thu Oct 18, 2012, 06:59 PM
Oct 2012

Last edited Fri Oct 19, 2012, 05:54 PM - Edit history (1)

Do thousand or millions of horrible deaths equal one? Is that "reciprocity"? Does every person who does nothing but good in their lives die a peaceful, pleasant death? No. No. No. And No.

Guess your so-called scientific "law" is a "law" except when it isn't...

This assumes God is bound by sides. rug Oct 2012 #1
The title simply refers to those who THINK God is on their side. The article is not anthropomorphic. SarahM32 Oct 2012 #4
God or Divinity is the same universally. AlbertCat Oct 2012 #6
Anthropomorphism makes poor theology. AlbertCat Oct 2012 #7
It's the exact opposite. rug Oct 2012 #8
I suppose that's why it's easier to mock cartoon notions of a god AlbertCat Oct 2012 #9
If you have to ask you have not progressed beyond cartoons. rug Oct 2012 #10
Was that supposed to be wit? AlbertCat Oct 2012 #11
Maybe it is you who should stop reading Chick comics and try Schleiermacher for starters. rug Oct 2012 #12
try Schleiermacher for starters. AlbertCat Oct 2012 #15
Then you're in a poor position to discuss it. rug Oct 2012 #18
Then you're in a poor position to discuss it. AlbertCat Oct 2012 #27
Apparently, you. rug Oct 2012 #31
Apparently, you. AlbertCat Oct 2012 #35
How come many religions have cannibalism as a major part?? Angry Dragon Oct 2012 #16
I can't think of one. rug Oct 2012 #17
Communion Angry Dragon Oct 2012 #19
As expected. rug Oct 2012 #20
But it is okay to base a religion on centuries old misstatements?? Angry Dragon Oct 2012 #21
Be my guest. rug Oct 2012 #22
I see you are still afraid to answer a direct question ...... Angry Dragon Oct 2012 #23
I told you. Read on the Eucharist. rug Oct 2012 #24
No...... you and I are discussing this ..you need to state your view Angry Dragon Oct 2012 #25
No I don't. It's your (borrowed) claim that Communion is cannibalism. rug Oct 2012 #26
I borrowed nothing Angry Dragon Oct 2012 #28
Oh, it's an original thought, is it? rug Oct 2012 #29
Too bad you have trouble coming up with original thoughts Angry Dragon Oct 2012 #30
Too bad you have trouble coming up with original thoughts rug Oct 2012 #32
I can't think of one. AlbertCat Oct 2012 #33
You are correct. I thought it was just human sacrifice but I was wrong. rug Oct 2012 #34
Anthropophagy makes poor theology, but it certainly had its day. dimbear Oct 2012 #39
which god? there are so many to choose from nt msongs Oct 2012 #2
The real one? Or all them other fictional ones? Iggo Oct 2012 #3
We reap what we have sown in the karmic consequences of our words and deeds. AlbertCat Oct 2012 #5
Yes. It's the scientific law of reciprocity, cause and effect, action and reaction. SarahM32 Oct 2012 #13
but also because we reap what we sow due to the karmic consequences AlbertCat Oct 2012 #14
I've already shown how and why it is universal, and scientific. SarahM32 Oct 2012 #41
Many of the wisest people in the world have said .... AlbertCat Oct 2012 #42
It's not merely action and reaction. It's karmic consequences, and justice. SarahM32 Oct 2012 #45
There isn't any *scientific* "law of reciprocity". It doesn't exist. Silent3 Oct 2012 #60
I understand your point, but look at it this way: SarahM32 Oct 2012 #68
utterly nonsensical question.... mike_c Oct 2012 #36
Tell that to the victims of so-called "holy war," waged by those who think God is on their side. SarahM32 Oct 2012 #37
all the more reason to call BS on questions like "who does God like best...." mike_c Oct 2012 #38
Then you miss the point entirely. SarahM32 Oct 2012 #40
just for the sake of being contrary AlbertCat Oct 2012 #43
That's your opinion and belief but you claim it's true. I'm not talking about opinion or belief. SarahM32 Oct 2012 #44
scientific law of reciprocity AlbertCat Oct 2012 #46
The scientific law of reciprocity SarahM32 Oct 2012 #47
No, its not...not remotely skepticscott Oct 2012 #48
Not to mention.... AlbertCat Oct 2012 #51
This is just Woo/New Age babble. mr blur Oct 2012 #49
You are just making this stuff up, aren't you? Scientific Law of Reciprocity? cleanhippie Oct 2012 #50
How and why it works. SarahM32 Oct 2012 #53
Horseshit. trotsky Oct 2012 #54
Already answered, but I will elaborate. SarahM32 Oct 2012 #55
I repeat: you have no evidence. trotsky Oct 2012 #57
Explain Joseph Stalin to me. kwassa Oct 2012 #56
Good point. But not entirely accurate. SarahM32 Oct 2012 #58
Did they endure ANYTHING like what they inflicted on others? skepticscott Oct 2012 #61
Good observation. But here's the thing ... SarahM32 Oct 2012 #65
Here's what you said skepticscott Oct 2012 #71
Your observation is correct, though your conclusion is not accurate. SarahM32 Oct 2012 #81
"Not going to take the time to check"?? skepticscott Oct 2012 #84
Thank you. SarahM32 Oct 2012 #86
I disagree kwassa Oct 2012 #62
Well, I partly agree, and partly disagree. SarahM32 Oct 2012 #66
By that logic we should consider demonic possession of dogs proven Warren Stupidity Oct 2012 #79
Why hypocrites who think God is on their side must be corrected. SarahM32 Oct 2012 #52
This is equivalent to asking DavidDvorkin Oct 2012 #59
You miss the point. SarahM32 Oct 2012 #63
No, you're missing the point DavidDvorkin Oct 2012 #64
I understand your point, but it merely reveals you don't understand mine. SarahM32 Oct 2012 #67
In other words, "God" is a meaningless word DavidDvorkin Oct 2012 #69
Not if you've experienced it. It's very real, and more meaningful that anything else. SarahM32 Oct 2012 #70
People get transcendent experiences from drugs, too DavidDvorkin Oct 2012 #72
Yes, they can, but they're not the same as those brought by natural revelation. SarahM32 Oct 2012 #73
! cleanhippie Oct 2012 #74
Sigh. Yes. That's the only appropriate response. DavidDvorkin Oct 2012 #75
No, not appropriate, but understandable. SarahM32 Oct 2012 #76
"an explanation of God" is a meaningless phrase DavidDvorkin Oct 2012 #77
"You have deluded yourself into thinking that you possess knowledge when all you possess is fantasy. cleanhippie Oct 2012 #78
Really? What is the difference between a natural hallucination and a drug induced one? Warren Stupidity Oct 2012 #80
A hallucination is not the same as a revelation. SarahM32 Oct 2012 #82
yeah it is, or more precisely .... Warren Stupidity Oct 2012 #83
Not really. And that's not at all "precise." SarahM32 Oct 2012 #85
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Whose Side Is God On? And...»Reply #61