Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: A nice counterbalance to a trainwreck of a thread [View all]humblebum
(5,881 posts)5. That is your interpretation of what I said. I could not disagree agree with you more.
There is not a single element of denigration toward the "natural circumstances of individuals" in anything that I have said. On the contrary, I criticize those who would attempt to interfere or stop those natural circumstances.
What I do detect from you, though, is a strong anti-religious bias in your insinuation.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
35 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
That is your interpretation of what I said. I could not disagree agree with you more.
humblebum
Feb 2013
#5
I have no idea where you got that from. You sure do not show it. Maybe the term
humblebum
Feb 2013
#7
If you did you failed to show it. I think your preconceived bias has affected your judgement. nt
humblebum
Feb 2013
#9
So then, if you have an objection to that statement, then that can only mean that you
humblebum
Feb 2013
#11
You are the one who objected to the statement, not me. And you are also the one telling me
humblebum
Feb 2013
#13
I am a fan of civility and I think people have every right to believe what they'd like.
MADem
Feb 2013
#29