Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LostOne4Ever

(9,311 posts)
73. Let me get what you are saying right...
Tue May 21, 2013, 06:57 AM
May 2013

First time I read through this I jumped to some conclusions. I thought you were saying we don't have morals. Now rereading this I think I get what you are trying to say.

[div class="excerpt" style="background-color:#dcdcdc; padding-bottom:5px; border:1px solid #bfbfbf; border-bottom:none; border-radius:0.4615em 0.4615em 0em 0em; box-shadow:3px 3px 3px #999999;"]Donald Ian Rankin[div class="excerpt" style="background-color:#f0f0f0; border:1px solid #bfbfbf; border-top:none; border-radius:0em 0em 0.4615em 0.4615em; box-shadow:3px 3px 3px #999999;"]What there *aren't*, and can't be, are any non-religious answers to the question "why is it in my interest to act ethically?". As an atheist, I have to accept that sometimes doing the right thing is not going to be rewarded.

Okay, so that I make sure Im getting what you are saying right let me just restate what I think you are trying say. You feel there is no SELFISH reason to act ethically as an atheist. While some theists have belief systems that include rewards in the after life for ethical behavior atheism does not. It is entirely possible for us to encounter situations where if we were to act ethically it would not benefit us in any way, and quite possibly acting in that way would be to our detriment.

Or in other words justice is not always served in end. The wicked are not always punished, and the just are not always rewarded.

You are not saying we cant be moral, so much as we might act ethically in vain. Is this right?
If so, the way you put it in your OP made it very hard to understand.

Even in these situations, I feel we do in fact have rewards in these situations...but they are not as concrete as the divine rewards our theist friends believe they will get and might not be very satisfying to some. The first is that we feel good for doing these things. The good deed is a reward in and of itself. It shows that we empathize with others and relieves the altruistic tension millions of years of evolution has drilled into us. We can also take pride in ourselves for doing something that others probably would not do. I guess this fits into your Dawkins example.

The second reward I believe we get from doing this is that we set an example. By doing selfless actions we leave examples for other. These examples can benefit us by either convincing others atheists to follow down our paths (thereby making the world a slightly better place) or by proving to theists that we can be just as moral if not more so as they can. The latter could lead to the end of many of the unfounded stereotypes and stigma associated atheism and help us find more acceptance in society.

Finally, I believe that if there is no true justice in this world, then the impetus is on us to bring what justice we can to this world, even if it is to our own detriment. It might not directly help me, but it might make things better for those who come after me.

[div class="excerpt" style="background-color:#dcdcdc; padding-bottom:5px; border:1px solid #bfbfbf; border-bottom:none; border-radius:0.4615em 0.4615em 0em 0em; box-shadow:3px 3px 3px #999999;"]Donald Ian Rankin[div class="excerpt" style="background-color:#f0f0f0; border:1px solid #bfbfbf; border-top:none; border-radius:0em 0em 0.4615em 0.4615em; box-shadow:3px 3px 3px #999999;"]This is only a weak absence, not a strong one like the other - atheism doesn't in any way preclude other things gluing communities together and providing a focus for the social life of a village, but it doesn't do so itself, and again religion does.

All I can say here is that I LOATHED going to church on sundays when I was a kid and was glad to not have to do that anymore. This makes sense in that I'm very socially phobic/schizoid. The type of community I got from church was very stressful and caused me nothing but anxiety. Conversely, on the internet I found a type of community with other agnostics/atheists that suits me better. People who see things more similarly to the way i do. So for me, at least, it brought me more community rather than less. Without this I probably would have been a hermit like you said

Regardless, this loss of community can easily be replaced by something else. Something that does not cause me the moral outrage that religion does when it attacks homosexuality, birth control, minorities, etc. If that loss of community is the price to get rid of all the awkward moments, boredom, constantly having to switch from standing to sitting to kneeling, and listening to morals I dont agree then that is the best trade i ever made

It is interesting you only consider the "positive" things that you believe religion brings, trotsky May 2013 #1
I believe religion brings many negative things, which are more than adequately discussed elsewhere. Donald Ian Rankin May 2013 #3
What leads you to the conclusion that the DU membership is cbayer May 2013 #7
Discussion in this subforum. N.T. Donald Ian Rankin May 2013 #10
JMHO, but I think most of the religious people who post on DU avoid this group like the plague. cbayer May 2013 #14
admittedly i haven't been around *that* long, but you're flat wrong. Phillip McCleod May 2013 #43
It has been my observation that there is a group of atheists... trotsky May 2013 #50
As I said, I think an honest discussion must include all the data. trotsky May 2013 #44
I believe the relevant saying here is "first cast out the beam out of thine own eye". N.T. Donald Ian Rankin May 2013 #70
You first. n/t trotsky May 2013 #74
How utterly insulting Warpy May 2013 #2
Did you get to the part where the OP identifies him/herself as an atheist? cbayer May 2013 #4
How utterly insulting to condemn my post without bothering to read it. Donald Ian Rankin May 2013 #6
Who is more ethical? Bay Boy May 2013 #5
I suspect both motivations are actually rare. Donald Ian Rankin May 2013 #8
Maybe Promethean May 2013 #21
"but if you ask the religious person why they chose to do the right thing"... goldent May 2013 #63
You think it's rare for an atheist to do the right thing because it's the right thing to do? Iggo May 2013 #77
Plato: the immoral person with a moral reputation or Warren Stupidity May 2013 #25
In regards to acting ethically (Point 1), you state: Moonwalk May 2013 #9
If I had said that, rather than saying exactly the reverse, I would have been wrong. Donald Ian Rankin May 2013 #11
sure we do. it's called 'empathy'. Phillip McCleod May 2013 #45
religions demand adherence to moral codes. Warren Stupidity May 2013 #12
i don't know that "demand" is the right word. most modern religions HAVE moral codes unblock May 2013 #16
You are condemned for eternity for failure to obey. Warren Stupidity May 2013 #18
many modern religions don't have language that strong, certainly not in practice. unblock May 2013 #26
are we discussing eating pork or killing your neighbor? Warren Stupidity May 2013 #38
you're making a distinction? unblock May 2013 #67
Yes. Warren Stupidity May 2013 #72
I don't know of many religions that preach that. Donald Ian Rankin May 2013 #30
It is obviously not "moral behavior" that gets one damned for eternity. Warren Stupidity May 2013 #39
+ 2.73 Gazillion!!! Phillip McCleod May 2013 #47
No, "demand" is the right word. Iggo May 2013 #79
As to your first point, I think both religious and non-religious people might cbayer May 2013 #13
Atheists rarely do not hear this one. longship May 2013 #15
Do you think that was what I said? If so, reread. N.T. Donald Ian Rankin May 2013 #17
Let me clarify, please. longship May 2013 #23
If you need religion to to help you be ethical atreides1 May 2013 #19
^^^^^+1,000,000^^^^^^^ Walk away May 2013 #35
In regards to acting ethically (point 2) you state: Moonwalk May 2013 #20
Oh, and your assumption is that without religion people would eat their babies. Warren Stupidity May 2013 #22
Is that satire or not? N.T. Donald Ian Rankin May 2013 #29
No it is your assumption. Warren Stupidity May 2013 #65
Perhaps you would let *me* tell *you* what my assumptions are? Donald Ian Rankin May 2013 #69
No, when you post stuff I get to decipher it. Warren Stupidity May 2013 #71
i disagree that religion "provides" a moral code. it claims a moral code as its own. unblock May 2013 #24
3'000 years of non-religious ethics disprove your first premise... Democracyinkind May 2013 #27
Which premise would that be? Donald Ian Rankin May 2013 #28
The premise that philosophy can't provide the why Democracyinkind May 2013 #31
Yup, that would be the "didn't bother to read" case, then. Donald Ian Rankin May 2013 #32
not really. Democracyinkind May 2013 #33
The answer to 'why behave ethically' might turn out to be 'because it benefits you directly'. Bluenorthwest May 2013 #34
Exactly. And a club for snooker lovers is a very sensible thing. Donald Ian Rankin May 2013 #37
You just defeated your own point Lordquinton May 2013 #41
If an atheist desires living in an ethical world, then that atheist has a really good, secular ZombieHorde May 2013 #36
There may be an additional "big thing" that religion provides. Jim__ May 2013 #40
pretty hard to see how that's a 'good' thing. \n Phillip McCleod May 2013 #48
Really? It's hard to see how group survival is a good thing? Jim__ May 2013 #54
yes, it is *hard* for me to see how group survival in and of itself.. Phillip McCleod May 2013 #57
Yup, that's a big thing alright. trotsky May 2013 #51
I would die to save my children. Goblinmonger May 2013 #78
wrong on both counts, imho. Phillip McCleod May 2013 #42
Rituals tend to be illogical. Dawson Leery May 2013 #52
I wonder if you have overlooked the allure of ritual. LiberalAndProud May 2013 #46
not everyone is allured by ritual. some of us are put off by it. Phillip McCleod May 2013 #49
I guess it depends on how we define ritual. LiberalAndProud May 2013 #53
ok but the point of the OP was that community offers something.. Phillip McCleod May 2013 #56
I'm intrigued by questions of what sociological and psychological roles religion plays LiberalAndProud May 2013 #58
softening my tone because you hit a soft spot.. Phillip McCleod May 2013 #61
To avoid any misunderstanding and as a point of reference, LiberalAndProud May 2013 #64
Same tired canard for the first point ... Trajan May 2013 #55
Community is in everyones self interest. Notafraidtoo May 2013 #59
A truely ethical person wouldn't need to be persuaded to do the right thing notadmblnd May 2013 #60
No. Without imbecilic just so stories we eat our babies. Warren Stupidity May 2013 #66
I like this quote by Marcus Aurelius Rob H. May 2013 #80
good words to live by notadmblnd May 2013 #81
Oh Please dem in texas May 2013 #62
As to your first point, that's an argument that demonstrates the ethical superiority... Humanist_Activist May 2013 #68
Very well put. n/t trotsky May 2013 #75
Let me get what you are saying right... LostOne4Ever May 2013 #73
Acting ethically..... Purplehazed May 2013 #76
it might be less offensive if you YankeyMCC May 2013 #82
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»The two big things I thin...»Reply #73