Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
17. That's what Washington Post does for a living, it's Amazon's opinion crafting wing....
Tue Mar 8, 2016, 09:10 AM
Mar 2016

They type up anything, as the lies about Danny Lyon's photos so clearly demonstrated. Offer them a biscuit, they jump up and do what it takes to get that biscuit.

It is called #vettingBernie riversedge Mar 2016 #1
No. It's not. Hissyspit Mar 2016 #3
The paper shares a past with Hillary re: Iraq. Broward Mar 2016 #6
No, it's called "throwing Clinton any amount of lifelines", Betty Karlson Mar 2016 #11
They are desperate to close Bernie out, he scares the shite out of them! Dustlawyer Mar 2016 #20
Clinton doesn't need a lifeline, but Bernie sure does. The NRA has campaigned for him at least. nt BreakfastClub Mar 2016 #21
Hillary Clinton To Raise Money From Ex-NRA Lobbyist Loudestlib Mar 2016 #34
No, that was Clinton - heading to a dinner hosted by the NRA people. Betty Karlson Mar 2016 #59
Lol, typical hillary supporter! Nt Logical Mar 2016 #27
You beat me to it. This is what vetting looks like. nt stevenleser Mar 2016 #31
ha ha. I do not think I have ever been a step ahead of you.. Have a good day and hope that Hillary riversedge Mar 2016 #37
Vetting? LOL. Look at the headlines! Does any headline mention one scandal mhatrw Mar 2016 #90
No, it is called #LyingForTheOligarchy n/t ljm2002 Mar 2016 #87
LOL. It's called flinging any shit in sight to see if something, anything will stick. mhatrw Mar 2016 #89
If only they vetted the Iraq war and WMDs as much. beedle Mar 2016 #94
No, it's called "catapulting the propaganda." Scootaloo Mar 2016 #101
Looks more like they are trying to help his campaign manager. NCTraveler Mar 2016 #2
.???? Weird post, what does this even mean? Nt Logical Mar 2016 #28
I just read it again. Seems to make perfect logical sense and is pretty basic. NCTraveler Mar 2016 #29
I don't understand your post either Matariki Mar 2016 #64
They have clearly started stumbling since SC. NCTraveler Mar 2016 #66
Huh? Matariki Mar 2016 #68
Don't listen to what people are saying. NCTraveler Mar 2016 #69
Buy from Amazon, feed a hungry oligarch / FlatBaroque Mar 2016 #4
oh that's right! The CEO of Amazon owns dana_b Mar 2016 #76
News for the loser tends to be negative. See: News for Rubio. nt onehandle Mar 2016 #5
Most of these are opinion pieces. Hissyspit Mar 2016 #7
All seem to be analysis for bad news. onehandle Mar 2016 #9
Pathetic really, chervilant Mar 2016 #46
Another excellent point.nt stevenleser Mar 2016 #32
Are any of these headlines lies? Supporters whine livetohike Mar 2016 #8
Where is the headline that says Hillary agrees with Ted Cruz (and all of the republicans) Doctor_J Mar 2016 #14
Love a free press. Nye Bevan Mar 2016 #10
Free my ass! Hillary traded lots of future interviews when she is POTUS to get this! Dustlawyer Mar 2016 #23
And Future Tax Beaks and Mergers, etc. gordyfl Mar 2016 #26
HEADLINE: DU no longer defends Democrats from hostile press - eye opening! Kip Humphrey Mar 2016 #43
Wait.... so it's OK for me to post on DU that I think Hillary won the debate over Bernie, Nye Bevan Mar 2016 #49
Way to minimize tacit approval! My post stands. Kip Humphrey Mar 2016 #50
stands head and shoulders above the fray. yes, it does. Hiraeth Mar 2016 #71
Welcome to what GD:P looks like for an HRC supporter. nt msanthrope Mar 2016 #12
You are welcome to leave DU if you are not in tune with what is important to most of its members. Bread and Circus Mar 2016 #18
Oh no....it's just getting good here. nt msanthrope Mar 2016 #35
Good, we are all having fun! Bread and Circus Mar 2016 #72
Really? Here are some OP's from GDP right now... Bluenorthwest Mar 2016 #24
How many posts did you have to skip to compile that list? Thor_MN Mar 2016 #44
oh thanks to the admins for the ignore feature dana_b Mar 2016 #79
Exactly. Sauce for the goose. nt stevenleser Mar 2016 #33
That's funny. Look at all the Bernie Bashing OP's I listed from GDP which you two insist is like Bluenorthwest Mar 2016 #40
Right wing establishment paper loves right wing establishment candidate. Surprise! Doctor_J Mar 2016 #13
Jeff Bezos loves Fascism. Octafish Mar 2016 #15
The Owner of the WP, the Amazon Warehouse Sweatshop King, knows who will deliver for him and his Skwmom Mar 2016 #16
That's what Washington Post does for a living, it's Amazon's opinion crafting wing.... Bluenorthwest Mar 2016 #17
(January) - "Bernie Sanders Just Unleashed on Media Pundits in the Most Devastating Way Possible" Donkees Mar 2016 #19
Thanks for posting this. Just amazing pberq Mar 2016 #88
K&R Mbrow Mar 2016 #22
The WP jpb33 Mar 2016 #25
The WP Carolina Mar 2016 #30
Sanders performed badly in the Flint debate. Trust Buster Mar 2016 #36
Your opinion is noted. Helen Borg Mar 2016 #39
The kitchen sink comes in many forms. FailureToCommunicate Mar 2016 #38
Long overdue if you ask me. NurseJackie Mar 2016 #41
And probably 50,000 or more negative stories on Hillary since 1992 book_worm Mar 2016 #42
You ought to start a thread with that. Title it: "So Funny" TheCowsCameHome Mar 2016 #47
They have propped up their corporate puppet for months. n/t Skwmom Mar 2016 #56
Under the bus with you WP Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Mar 2016 #45
Firstly ... The WP has not been particularly friendly to Democrats Trajan Mar 2016 #55
Yet I approve of this? Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Mar 2016 #85
1. The WaPo sucks. Hissyspit Mar 2016 #96
Because the Washington Post sucks? Hissyspit Mar 2016 #95
It's actually quite informative Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Mar 2016 #98
So just ignore their massive failures on covering the Bush administration? Hissyspit Mar 2016 #99
Fear lsewpershad Mar 2016 #48
But online polls say he won the debate Renew Deal Mar 2016 #51
This is what Pants Wetting and PANIC fredamae Mar 2016 #52
so reporting what a candidate is saying and doing that isn't all rah-rah-rah is beachbum bob Mar 2016 #53
Pay for play baby. Amazon is racking up those millions, feeding at the public trough. Skwmom Mar 2016 #54
This campaign has allowed the newspapers to show their real colors. Red Oak Mar 2016 #57
Standard tactics used by the Money classes. blackspade Mar 2016 #58
I Think We Crashed FAIR's Servers... WillyT Mar 2016 #60
Has Capehart ever apologized or retracted their swift boat hit piece on Bernie from the Post? EndElectoral Mar 2016 #61
I would think not Laughing Mirror Mar 2016 #83
That's what the media does. kstewart33 Mar 2016 #62
Bought. And paid for. Matariki Mar 2016 #63
Negative stories about a negative candidate. That's how it works. Freddie Stubbs Mar 2016 #65
Bwaha! Hissyspit Mar 2016 #97
As some have stated UglyGreed Mar 2016 #67
I expect nothing less from that conservative rag. Hiraeth Mar 2016 #70
And that's 14 more stories than they ran on him in the previous 9 months!!! Bread and Circus Mar 2016 #73
We have to build our own media Cheese Sandwich Mar 2016 #74
So? whatchamacallit Mar 2016 #75
WaPo is basically a multi-corporate shared PR department. Lizzie Poppet Mar 2016 #77
So, business as usual in the fair-and-balanced world of the corporate media. Jester Messiah Mar 2016 #78
This is sickening. Cheese Sandwich Mar 2016 #80
Just doing their job representing their interests Laughing Mirror Mar 2016 #81
Right wing presstitutes. GoneFishin Mar 2016 #82
In America, we have the free-est press money can buy. rgbecker Mar 2016 #84
K & R AzDar Mar 2016 #86
Mea Culpa. I wasn't happy about Sanders suggestion that republicans were mentally ill. HereSince1628 Mar 2016 #91
WP criticized Trump for stigmatizing language about people with mental disorders, too HereSince1628 Mar 2016 #92
They called him a liar beedle Mar 2016 #93
Just Karl Roves toilet reading material Blue Owl Mar 2016 #100
I wave my bared buttocks in their general direction. CentralMass Mar 2016 #102
Ah, yes, the former mighty Washington Post. SMC22307 Mar 2016 #103
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Washington Post Ran 16 Ne...»Reply #17