Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

silvershadow

(10,336 posts)
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 08:23 AM Mar 2016

Public’s Disgust With the Democratic Party Propels Sanders [View all]

Bernie Sanders is a fine politician, but that is not why he has emerged from obscurity to win so many Democratic primaries. The real story here is the breakdown of the ideology pursued for decades by the Democratic Party’s dominant faction.

The party gave up its historic mission to serve working people years ago and chose instead to represent the New Economy’s winners.
The Great Recession started in 2007, and for millions of average Americans no recovery has come. For most of the years since then, there has been a Democrat in the White House, and those Americans have a right to wonder why the eloquent hero they voted for has done so little to improve their situation. They see that banks, health insurance companies and Silicon Valley are doing extremely well; why, then, don’t their wages grow?

The answer, and the key to Sanders’s success, is staring us in the face: Because the Democratic Party gave up years ago on its historic mission of serving working people and chose instead to make itself into the party of professionals, of the New Economy’s winners, of a group they love to flatter with phrases like “symbolic analysts,” “wired workers” and the “creative class.”

This shifting allegiance is the fundamental reason that Democrats began to identify with Wall Street back in the 1990s (and then with Silicon Valley) but what makes this story so aggravating is the way Democrats keep choosing professionals over workers again and again. One class of Americans they reward with subsidies and forgiveness; the rest of us get discipline. The 1994 crime bill and the end of welfare were all brought to you, remember, by the same Democratic administration that rolled back the rules for banks and telecoms. The North American Free Trade Agreement and its many successors have brought, well, freedom to those who employ but anxiety and diminished lives to those who work. The present Democratic administration has hounded individuals who lied on mortgage applications, but it seems to find top bankers incapable of wrongdoing. And in these years of galloping industrial concentration and power grabs by Silicon Valley, antitrust enforcement has dropped off the agenda.
-----------------------
more: http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2016/03/14/has-bernie-sanders-been-underestimated/publics-disgust-with-the-democratic-party-propels-sanders
-----------------------
JURY/MODs: This is an OPINION piece. It is not meant to disparage Democrats. I posted it so we can all see a variety of opinions and views that are out there. Please have some consideration and leave this, during a time when we should ALL be highly reflective. This election will quite literally determine the future of our party, and possibly its' survival. Let us not do as the Republicans appear to be doing...

191 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This is a constructive , thoughtful post. Thanks! nt ladjf Mar 2016 #1
In twenty years we will see this as a historic moment Baobab Mar 2016 #53
I see Bernie Go Vols Mar 2016 #172
Bernie Sanders has not been vetted. Period. n/t asuhornets Mar 2016 #2
That's what primary campaigns are for, isn't it. bklyncowgirl Mar 2016 #12
But he WILL be vetted. If he gets close to the nomination.. asuhornets Mar 2016 #13
Any day now he'll get vetted .......lol Loudestlib Mar 2016 #16
"Right Clinton is still on track to win the nomination." Snarkoleptic Mar 2016 #73
Really? asuhornets Mar 2016 #83
Really? YES Snarkoleptic Mar 2016 #87
What about asuhornets Mar 2016 #94
Changing the subject already? Snarkoleptic Mar 2016 #111
Excellent job at SoS? Fawke Em Mar 2016 #113
her excellent job as SOS AlbertCat Mar 2016 #150
Oh, please. nt SylviaD Mar 2016 #163
Please...oh please AlbertCat Mar 2016 #164
What, exactly, are those excellent accomplishments? n/t elljay Mar 2016 #177
What, exactly, are those excellent accomplishments? AlbertCat Mar 2016 #186
Shouldn't it, now? elljay Mar 2016 #188
the more i learn ellennelle Mar 2016 #151
Neocons is as neocons does. Ed Suspicious Mar 2016 #157
Link please. n/t ljm2002 Mar 2016 #119
When? n/t Gore1FL Mar 2016 #147
so sorry ellennelle Mar 2016 #152
OMG, I can't believe you just said that. passiveporcupine Mar 2016 #178
EXPOSE! Sanders is a democratic socialist! What a shocker! Wait till people get wind of that! imagine2015 Mar 2016 #118
Vetted more than Obama was in 2008, when he went on... Herman4747 Mar 2016 #17
Obama did not beat Hillary Gwhittey Mar 2016 #41
During this primary, Bernie has outperformed EVERY prediction against him. closeupready Mar 2016 #108
I don't know if that is logic or not, but I hope you are right! n/t Gore1FL Mar 2016 #149
I have a feeling that the vetting has been intense and deep. dchill Mar 2016 #35
+1! KPN Mar 2016 #51
Exactly boobooday Mar 2016 #104
They even have to lie about his voting record. dchill Mar 2016 #106
The Clintons have never been shy about using anything and everything to win. bklyncowgirl Mar 2016 #116
If HRC's oppo research and David Brock had found any real dirt on Bernie, we tblue37 Mar 2016 #182
Yes. dchill Mar 2016 #183
I sure hope they don't. snort Mar 2016 #39
Link please. n/t ljm2002 Mar 2016 #120
he's being vetted right now and worst that's been found is wordpix Mar 2016 #45
Bernie's Gun Vote was the correct position. bvar22 Mar 2016 #139
Hillary has -- fully! KPN Mar 2016 #48
True. Here are some of her "accomplishments": Lorien Mar 2016 #129
wow. sadly, i bet this list did not take you a lot of time restorefreedom Mar 2016 #145
That's incredible!!! KPN Mar 2016 #156
Feel free. I borrowed many from another DUer (whose name escapes me) Lorien Mar 2016 #168
it's powerful seeing them listed Viva_La_Revolution Mar 2016 #166
A partial list of why I won't vote for Hillary, but will vote for Bernie: Lorien Mar 2016 #170
Thank you for that list! LittleGirl Mar 2016 #181
You're on to something there! NurseJackie Mar 2016 #52
Yes. I was alerted for my post... asuhornets Mar 2016 #69
It's difficult for me to understand ... NurseJackie Mar 2016 #75
So, Hillary has not vetted Bernie? tecelote Mar 2016 #71
Bernie's supporters "complain loudly" about LIES about him. WorseBeforeBetter Mar 2016 #85
What types of vetting did you have in mind that should be ladjf Mar 2016 #59
Everything...n/t asuhornets Mar 2016 #70
"Everything" is a very long list. Would you be willing to narrow ladjf Mar 2016 #72
Here ya go: asuhornets Mar 2016 #76
Bernie has a detailed plan to pay for healthcare expansion and free tuition. Snarkoleptic Mar 2016 #100
There is one photo of him during the 60's asuhornets Mar 2016 #102
I presented an article, which you obviously chose not to read. Snarkoleptic Mar 2016 #112
stunning ellennelle Mar 2016 #160
Oh, now that THAT photo has been verified by the photographer, Peace Patriot Mar 2016 #161
There are several photos. nt tblue37 Mar 2016 #184
I would gladly pay a higher tax for healthcare if AllyCat Mar 2016 #185
Which has zero to do with the OP LondonReign2 Mar 2016 #79
The guy's been in Congress for 35 + years. Arugula Latte Mar 2016 #80
That's exactly what it seems like...n/t asuhornets Mar 2016 #81
Why? His actions are public. Arugula Latte Mar 2016 #84
No one has any idea asuhornets Mar 2016 #91
No one has any idea how anyone will govern as president. Arugula Latte Mar 2016 #93
Yea but asuhornets Mar 2016 #95
That's why people overwhelmingly farleftlib Mar 2016 #96
Bernie asuhornets Mar 2016 #99
I assure you timmymoff Mar 2016 #155
She hasn't weathered the storm. And millions and millions of people DON'T like her, Arugula Latte Mar 2016 #97
Hillary asuhornets Mar 2016 #101
Do you not understand rynestonecowboy Mar 2016 #179
Weathered the storm? beedle Mar 2016 #138
Only to someone who hasn't been paying attention. WorseBeforeBetter Mar 2016 #92
I pay attention asuhornets Mar 2016 #103
Back-tracking your lair comment now? WorseBeforeBetter Mar 2016 #105
Hillary has a ton of baggage, Bernie nope Ferd Berfel Mar 2016 #122
HELL YES he has! More so than Hillary! Lorien Mar 2016 #128
yea right...n/t asuhornets Mar 2016 #131
And Clinton has been vetted and found to betray her Party for 1. War in Iraq rhett o rick Mar 2016 #148
in public office 30 years ellennelle Mar 2016 #158
Sanders has been thoroughly vetted, & then some, by Clinton's machine. Peace Patriot Mar 2016 #174
Voting for the Iraq war is anti-vetting, so to speak n/t eridani Mar 2016 #180
I look forward to reading Thomas Frank's new book which comes out tomorrow! nt m-lekktor Mar 2016 #3
The argument is far more convincing on the Republican side mythology Mar 2016 #4
Well, she thinks she is anyway... silvershadow Mar 2016 #5
With long time democratic values? daleanime Mar 2016 #47
I disagree. KPN Mar 2016 #63
Actually not hard to say at all. dchill Mar 2016 #110
This is an important discussion floppyboo Mar 2016 #6
Traitors would be the intransigent Republicans who did their best to nullify an entire Presidency.nt silvershadow Mar 2016 #8
No doubt. floppyboo Mar 2016 #11
+10000, thanks wordpix Mar 2016 #46
"NAFTA & its many successors have brought freedom to those who employ but RiverLover Mar 2016 #7
I can see it now; Repubicans can move the entire fiasco of the millions of jobs lost to trade deals DhhD Mar 2016 #24
All excellent points revbones Mar 2016 #50
One big motherfucking kick and recommendation! Bonobo Mar 2016 #9
You got it! nt silvershadow Mar 2016 #10
100% agree. /nt RiverLover Mar 2016 #15
Absolutely! Punkingal Mar 2016 #60
Moses didn't think he was worthy either, but he went on and led. mariawr Mar 2016 #121
This Revolt Has Been Building For Years - The DWS, DNC, DLC, Third-Way Has Only Themselves To Blame cantbeserious Mar 2016 #14
The internet may yet roll back the damage of the Tellecommunications Act. floppyboo Mar 2016 #18
We live with a representative government. Trust Buster Mar 2016 #19
Gerrymandering. nt silvershadow Mar 2016 #20
In the House, yes. In the Senate, no. Trust Buster Mar 2016 #22
I don't agree with your thoughts about the next President. He will have a cooperative silvershadow Mar 2016 #23
Agreed. And it will be an opposite situation from Obama. Sanders wiil have the last six years of DhhD Mar 2016 #27
Well before Willy Gwhittey Mar 2016 #44
You think that Republicans will cooperate with a man they see as a Socialist ? Trust Buster Mar 2016 #28
I don't expect the Republicans will even retain the House at this point. nt silvershadow Mar 2016 #29
You clearly don't understand re-districting and gerrymandering. Trust Buster Mar 2016 #31
You seem without faith or hope. But get back to your numbers and the joy they bring or despair. highprincipleswork Mar 2016 #33
Faith and Hope are tools for the religious and do not reflect political reality. Trust Buster Mar 2016 #40
Seems to me that "political reality" is over-rated. KPN Mar 2016 #68
No, they're necessary for pretty much any survival, but work with what ya got. highprincipleswork Mar 2016 #78
+1000! KPN Mar 2016 #65
Why waste your time posting. anothergreenbus Mar 2016 #49
I have no intention of hiding under a rock with the makeup of the Supreme Court hanging in the Trust Buster Mar 2016 #54
Ahh, yes, SCOTUS...Always the fall-back argument during triangulation. Resist triangulation! nt silvershadow Mar 2016 #134
+1000000. SammyWinstonJack Mar 2016 #167
I've read this in several places, and for a while now. RiverLover Mar 2016 #55
Agreed. Trust Buster Mar 2016 #56
You sound like Hillary. KPN Mar 2016 #66
But they'll cooperate with Hillary because the like her Republican ideas??? LondonReign2 Mar 2016 #90
Unlike Sanders, the Democrats will cooperate with Hillary's agenda. Trust Buster Mar 2016 #98
LOL. Awesome, Democrats wouldn't cooperate with the Democratic President LondonReign2 Mar 2016 #117
Hillary worked with Republicans just fine when she was Senator. Trust Buster Mar 2016 #124
You can't seem to answer this simple question: What will Hillary get Republicans to vote with her LondonReign2 Mar 2016 #127
Hillary is going to reshape the Supreme Court and fill the backlog of Federal Judge positions Trust Buster Mar 2016 #130
So you are saying that Hillary will get judges appointed that Obama can't? LondonReign2 Mar 2016 #132
^that!^ elljay Mar 2016 #189
They like to trot out their little "Bernie won't be able to get anything done" line LondonReign2 Mar 2016 #190
Thanks for challenging them! elljay Mar 2016 #191
Structurally representative truebluegreen Mar 2016 #67
Republicans control the Senate and the House. Trust Buster Mar 2016 #109
Um, they haven't been representing the INTERESTS of their constituents truebluegreen Mar 2016 #115
On that count, it doesn't matter what you think. Trust Buster Mar 2016 #123
You're right: it does not matter a whit what I think, truebluegreen Mar 2016 #137
Which of Hillary's proposals are the Republicans to agree to? LondonReign2 Mar 2016 #89
That explains his administration's efforts on behalf of the TPP brentspeak Mar 2016 #107
Absolutely! That's the only word to describe your OP pdsimdars Mar 2016 #21
Bearing in mind that the "dominant faction" took control of the Party... brooklynite Mar 2016 #25
They triangulated their way into position. That said, they were placeholders. silvershadow Mar 2016 #26
And the Root Cause & Expose' fredamae Mar 2016 #30
Absolutely! And Bernie is still a great representative of our POV and our dissent. highprincipleswork Mar 2016 #32
Spot on! anothergreenbus Mar 2016 #34
Further evidence that DU has devolved into a Sanders cheerleading site. Paladin Mar 2016 #36
two entirely different forums. Must have hit a nerve. silvershadow Mar 2016 #37
I was blocked from Sanders for suggesting that DU was a Sanders site katmondoo Mar 2016 #38
Thanks for voting for Bernie! Divernan Mar 2016 #42
I think the two groups have naturally separated. The majority of DU are Bernie supporters. liberal_at_heart Mar 2016 #136
I love you Paladin ...but Trajan Mar 2016 #57
It points to some painful truths about the party. We should be able to discuss these issues. Arugula Latte Mar 2016 #82
God forbid... mathewsleep Mar 2016 #126
Some people are using the ignore feature, and may not be able to see this OP. Major Hogwash Mar 2016 #171
really sucks when we have to put a disclaimer about it PatrynXX Mar 2016 #43
think independently IndyV0te Mar 2016 #58
K&R CharlotteVale Mar 2016 #61
remember though, when assessing the dem party and its certainot Mar 2016 #62
The face of the party, does not help FlatBaroque Mar 2016 #64
Promoting the common good, the benevolence of the federal government and usefulness of taxes andym Mar 2016 #74
K&R vintx Mar 2016 #77
I agree with your very thoughtful post. Duval Mar 2016 #86
Sad, but true. nt Zorra Mar 2016 #88
well, look at what the party's publicly come to stand for as opposed to say 1988 MisterP Mar 2016 #114
This is why the idea of Bernie Sanders will last long after the man himself Arkana Mar 2016 #125
+1. nt silvershadow Mar 2016 #135
Absolutely! KPN Mar 2016 #154
That's on a nutshell...And Bernie is proving them WRONG noiretextatique Mar 2016 #133
We need to get rid of the DNC and start the Democratic Socialist Committee - DSC Ivan Kaputski Mar 2016 #140
The Democratic Party has not helped the poor, working poor and middle class since Jimmy Carter. Dont call me Shirley Mar 2016 #141
We didn't leave the Democratic Party, it left us. PatrickforO Mar 2016 #142
Seems kinda back to normal for a second shadowmayor Mar 2016 #143
great article! Big K and R! bbgrunt Mar 2016 #144
I think I agree with you but I need to ask one question. jwirr Mar 2016 #146
Oh I did not author this piece. I just shared it. nt silvershadow Mar 2016 #153
Well does anyone else know what the author is referring to jwirr Mar 2016 #159
My Understanding of what the OP Meant are PCPrincess Mar 2016 #176
Thank you. Then I do agree with the author. Every time I jwirr Mar 2016 #187
Off the mark, in my opinion Wibly Mar 2016 #162
KnR SammyWinstonJack Mar 2016 #165
After all of the triangulation of the DNC for the past 20 years, this article is a no-brainer. Major Hogwash Mar 2016 #169
Kick and R BeanMusical Mar 2016 #173
Kicking nt LiberalElite Mar 2016 #175
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Public’s Disgust With the...»Reply #0