Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Their Kids Don't Attend Public School [View all]LibDemAlways
(15,139 posts)7. All of that is true. But like I said, children kept
Last edited Sun Mar 20, 2016, 05:55 PM - Edit history (1)
out of public schools means less government funding for those schools which hurts children whose families can't afford pricey private schools. My daughter attended public school and parents were constantly asked for contributions to fund programs the government couldn't provide.
If parents choose to go the private school route, they are certainly free to do so, but public schools in California anyway are allotted funds based on pupil attendance. Every private school child means less money in public school coffers.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
49 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
School taxes are paid, even when the children don't attend, so how are fewer dollars
synergie
Mar 2016
#10
You do realize, don't you, that Sanders also has the same type of fundraiser with the same dollar
Tanuki
Mar 2016
#19
I've heard that Bill Clinton was so poor they grew up without indoor plumbing
shadowandblossom
Mar 2016
#45
obama's kids don't go to public school. stanford is not a public school either. virgin mary
msongs
Mar 2016
#2
How? Do you think that the cities in which these poeple live don't collect school taxes and
synergie
Mar 2016
#18
By their "base" you mean, to raise money for Democrats? Like Bernie was supposed to do
synergie
Mar 2016
#16
guess you missed the point; but, otherwise, why are you defending restricting access to billion
amborin
Mar 2016
#8
So what was your point, and where is your proof that the poeple you refer to are billionaires?
synergie
Mar 2016
#15
Real ones don't make such silly and moronic assuptions about parents who choose
synergie
Mar 2016
#13
The OIP wasn't saying the Clinton's did, but that these random people who were
synergie
Mar 2016
#12
I get that this post is supposed to be a smear, since that's pretty much what I've come to expect
synergie
Mar 2016
#11
Let me guess....do all of Bernie's high rolling donors send their kids to public schools?
Tanuki
Mar 2016
#17
I agree with you. I started with boys in private, different reasons, but supposedly higher academics
seabeyond
Mar 2016
#42
There is that, what Katsy suggested. I also found with my boys that keeping them in the
seabeyond
Mar 2016
#43
So people who send their kids to a fancy school are hosting a Clinton fundraiser?
gollygee
Mar 2016
#35