Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Californeeway

(97 posts)
82. You don't know who my candidate is
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 04:17 PM
Mar 2016

. I don't really want either of them: one is to far to the center, one is too far to the left. Neither one really speaks for me but I know I'd prefer either over our other options and my criticism of Susan Sarandon has only to do with her and comes from the heart. I don't give a shit about scoring points against Bernie. I like him but I'm being honest with myself: the Left has gotten weird over the last few years for lack of better terms. I'm really alienated by it. It's gotten so radical and just absolutely nihilist and destructive compared to how it was in the Bush years. I can't stand the way so much of this sort of Liberaltarian know-nothing anti-establishment types have dictated the tone. Too many people just spewing bumper sticker slogans and trying to pass it off as thinking. I live in SF supposedly some liberal bastion but the truth is most people here are very liberal as a pose. They don't give give a crap about working class people, they just wanna look cool. Susan personifies that heartless arrogance perfectly with her words. Try to parse it however but it just makes it look like you're ready to toss me to the wolves too. But maybe chalk it up to surrogates going off the reservation and saying offensive crap that their candidate would never say. Bernie deserves better. I mean that in multiple ways.

No she is being challenged. She is not a martyr. hrmjustin Mar 2016 #1
This message was self-deleted by its author silvershadow Mar 2016 #2
Challenged on her statement on Trump and Hillary. hrmjustin Mar 2016 #5
This message was self-deleted by its author silvershadow Mar 2016 #9
That is not what she said. hrmjustin Mar 2016 #19
This message was self-deleted by its author silvershadow Mar 2016 #22
She never said she would vote for Hillary if elected. hrmjustin Mar 2016 #24
Maybe she doesn't think Hillary is the likely Democratic nominee? JonLeibowitz Mar 2016 #27
The question was explicitly about Clinton, in the event that she was the nominee. Tanuki Mar 2016 #61
You need to review her original video or tape. You are wrong. riversedge Mar 2016 #33
So, when Sanders supports swarm Facebooks for Hillary surrogates are they Dixie-chicked?? riversedge Mar 2016 #10
Listen, the h supporters really aren't ready to make nice... artislife Mar 2016 #23
Dixie chicks said something directly about Bush revbones Mar 2016 #6
she also has said thing directly about Clinton, but you KNOW that is NOT the issue here? bettyellen Mar 2016 #69
No but if they're going to challenge her, it should be on something she actually said. Jarqui Mar 2016 #12
This message was self-deleted by its author silvershadow Mar 2016 #25
You hold the Dixie Chics in that high of regard? NWCorona Mar 2016 #13
yes I do and she is no Dixie Chic. hrmjustin Mar 2016 #21
I'm not a "new country" kind of guy but I respect their craft. NWCorona Mar 2016 #30
I am not into country but I respect their work as well. hrmjustin Mar 2016 #32
Ahh, using a Ronald Reagan style quote, how Reagan-esque. nt TheBlackAdder Mar 2016 #48
Actually, he's riffing on a quote by Sen. Lloyd Bentsen, a Democrat, who famously originated Tanuki Mar 2016 #59
Ronald Reagan: I knew Thomas Jefferson, and Governor, You're no Thomas Jefferson! TheBlackAdder Mar 2016 #81
Nope, you are wrong. You can look it up in the Wikipedia link in my previous post. Tanuki Mar 2016 #85
Challenged? No, she is being misquoted and smeared. cui bono Mar 2016 #75
Poor baby. You make her out to be a victim. ha ha. riversedge Mar 2016 #3
Well, when she's attacked for now reason, then she's a victim. revbones Mar 2016 #8
Why so dismissive? NWCorona Mar 2016 #18
This message was self-deleted by its author silvershadow Mar 2016 #28
Eventually, EVERYBODY who doesn't support Hillary will be Dixie-Chicked. djean111 Mar 2016 #4
This message was self-deleted by its author silvershadow Mar 2016 #14
Yeah, like snails tularetom Mar 2016 #34
LOL. I must have missed the coordinate right-wing business campaign to ruin her career. DanTex Mar 2016 #7
You mean they're finally going to take her off the radio? Blue_Adept Mar 2016 #11
This message was self-deleted by its author silvershadow Mar 2016 #20
Aha - there's your problem. You don't know what happened to the Dixie Chicks muriel_volestrangler Mar 2016 #72
I miss the unrec button at times like this. Tanuki Mar 2016 #15
I remember that the Dixie Chicks were Dixie Chicked by the Republicans BernieforPres2016 Mar 2016 #16
She wasn't 'Dixie-Chicked' after she helped elect George W. Bush. onehandle Mar 2016 #17
This message was self-deleted by its author Gomez163 Mar 2016 #26
As does Ms. Sarandon. nt Gidney N Cloyd Mar 2016 #80
Not quite. Similar more to Jane Fonda. Sort of. 7wo7rees Mar 2016 #29
Susan's milieu is also Hollywood 2016, where her Bernie support will cost her nothing in terms Tanuki Mar 2016 #41
I don't understand why either. What she said is not nearly as offensive as what Madeline Albright jillan Mar 2016 #31
This message was self-deleted by its author silvershadow Mar 2016 #35
I will never forget at the PBS debate when Hillary was given the opportunity to apologize to women jillan Mar 2016 #38
This message was self-deleted by its author silvershadow Mar 2016 #40
No she isn't. Hillary Clinton is the "likely" candidate. Faux coyness about Sarandon's Tanuki Mar 2016 #43
This message was self-deleted by its author silvershadow Mar 2016 #44
Chris Hayes' question wasn't some vague query about "the likely candidate." Tanuki Mar 2016 #45
This message was self-deleted by its author silvershadow Mar 2016 #47
and she said she didn't know. beedle Mar 2016 #93
Yep. Joe McCarthy has taken up residence on DU. Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2016 #36
She's actually being swift-boated since she never said what they are saying she said. cui bono Mar 2016 #37
I keep pointing that out, as well. Blue_In_AK Mar 2016 #63
Exactly. She said "people are saying..." about Trump bringing the revolution quicker. cui bono Mar 2016 #76
Not even close wyldwolf Mar 2016 #39
Nobody talks back. Nobody resists. Or else. Gregorian Mar 2016 #42
This message was self-deleted by its author silvershadow Mar 2016 #49
... LexVegas Mar 2016 #46
No she isn't. Bobbie Jo Mar 2016 #50
Leftist women don't stand a chance. senz Mar 2016 #51
Virtually tarred and feathered. Downwinder Mar 2016 #52
An untrained and careless spokeperson expressed herself in a silly way alcibiades_mystery Mar 2016 #53
She isn't a "spokesperson". Nice try. She is an individual voter. nt silvershadow Mar 2016 #54
She's untrained and sounded like a "Heighten the Contradictions" style dumbass alcibiades_mystery Mar 2016 #56
And yet, she is not a spokesperson. nt silvershadow Mar 2016 #58
They are McCarthyists, pure and simple. They are the Reagan Democrats. Conservative and reactionary. Bluenorthwest Mar 2016 #55
This message was self-deleted by its author silvershadow Mar 2016 #60
All these people fuming at Susan were sanguine about Hillary's love song to Ron and Nancy Bluenorthwest Mar 2016 #66
She thinks people like me should suffer Californeeway Mar 2016 #57
Except she said none of that, and your candidate spent years citing her Christian faith when Bluenorthwest Mar 2016 #65
You don't know who my candidate is Californeeway Mar 2016 #82
How about those that have been suffering ever since Reagan and the Democrats who are liberal_at_heart Mar 2016 #77
Good post. treestar Mar 2016 #84
Only Hillary supporters can be attacked for what they say during interviews on TV. JoePhilly Mar 2016 #62
This message was self-deleted by its author silvershadow Mar 2016 #64
Yea, I heard she walked her comments back some. Good for her. JoePhilly Mar 2016 #70
She's not being one_voice Mar 2016 #73
the Dixie Chicks wanted to "Bern it down"?!?! Wow. News to me. bettyellen Mar 2016 #67
THe Dixie Chicks were blackballed by REPUBLICAN/CONSERVATIVES/TEABAGGERS WhiteTara Mar 2016 #68
Shouldn't her endorsement of IWR sponsor John Edwards in 2008 disqualify her opinion? CalvinballPro Mar 2016 #71
Dixie Chicks attacked for what they said. Sarandon attacked for something she didn't even say Attorney in Texas Mar 2016 #74
And yet Bernie is the one that needs to tone it down. liberal_at_heart Mar 2016 #78
Let's saran-wrap this issue and stick it in the back of the fridge. Eleanors38 Mar 2016 #79
Does that mean people are not going to her movies any more? treestar Mar 2016 #83
Dixie Chicks... MrWendel Mar 2016 #86
She is being swift boated LostOne4Ever Mar 2016 #87
She's just feeling the bern RandySF Mar 2016 #88
Most Americans remember the Bush years. They are anti-Naderism. joshcryer Mar 2016 #89
As someone who is in the 1%, I think she can survive some critcism KingFlorez Mar 2016 #90
You are wrong workinclasszero Mar 2016 #91
"Susan Sarandon GAVE US Bush" You spelled SCOTUS wrong. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #94
She put her foot in her mouth and paid for it n/t cosmicone Mar 2016 #92
This message was self-deleted by its author silvershadow Mar 2016 #95
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»This message was self-del...»Reply #82