Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Showing Original Post only (View all)
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
53 replies, 10251 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
53 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So they should select someone who's losing both pledged delegates and the popular vote
Cali_Democrat
May 2016
#23
Yes. Tell the super-duper-delegates that they don't have to take the dirty money
rhett o rick
May 2016
#22
with no tax deductions. And to legitimate charities not money laundrys like
rhett o rick
May 2016
#28
Better than calling the women the b word and threatening to cut out men's tongues.
seabeyond
May 2016
#3
They just know that to get it, they need to vote for Hillary, who shares those views
synergie
May 2016
#12
Clinton can not be trusted. She lied about WMD in Iraq. How much more serious can you get?
rhett o rick
May 2016
#25
You seem to be getting her confused with Bush, so I'd suggest that wherever you get
synergie
May 2016
#53
Oh that pesky math again, CONS and BSer do not like math and science, it tells them
synergie
May 2016
#27